Date   

Re: "try.cncf.io"

Pini Reznik
 

Of course Brian.
We will just have a first call today.

On vr 3 jun. 2016 at 13:35, Brian Grant <briangrant@...> wrote:
Pini, please keep me in the loop. 


On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Pini Reznik via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
We are available indeed.
Will continue the conversation with Dan and Chris.

Pini

On vr 3 jun. 2016 at 12:11, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:


On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, 19:05 Camille Fournier, <skamille@...> wrote:
I got connected briefly with the folks making this:

which is I think in the general ballpark.

they contacted me off list yesterday to say they are available 

i connected them with Dan K


C

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Jon,

Noted, thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?)

I think we'd want to commission a 3rd party to do work, much as we talked about for some of the docs.

 
and b) putting the cart before the horse - as Alexis alluded to I think we have some way to go before we have a clear enough idea of the model applications etc.

Indeed.

a


 

On 2 June 2016 at 10:25, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc


_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
--

Pini Reznik

CTO - Container Solutions

Mobile: +31 (0) 6 317 99 811

Address: Korte Leidsedwarsstraat 12, 1017 RC Amsterdam

@pini42  www.container-solutions.com



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc


--

Pini Reznik

CTO - Container Solutions

Mobile: +31 (0) 6 317 99 811

Address: Korte Leidsedwarsstraat 12, 1017 RC Amsterdam

@pini42  www.container-solutions.com



Re: "try.cncf.io"

Brian Grant
 

Pini, please keep me in the loop. 

On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 12:28 PM, Pini Reznik via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
We are available indeed.
Will continue the conversation with Dan and Chris.

Pini

On vr 3 jun. 2016 at 12:11, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:


On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, 19:05 Camille Fournier, <skamille@...> wrote:
I got connected briefly with the folks making this:

which is I think in the general ballpark.

they contacted me off list yesterday to say they are available 

i connected them with Dan K


C

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Jon,

Noted, thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?)

I think we'd want to commission a 3rd party to do work, much as we talked about for some of the docs.

 
and b) putting the cart before the horse - as Alexis alluded to I think we have some way to go before we have a clear enough idea of the model applications etc.

Indeed.

a


 

On 2 June 2016 at 10:25, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc


_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
--

Pini Reznik

CTO - Container Solutions

Mobile: +31 (0) 6 317 99 811

Address: Korte Leidsedwarsstraat 12, 1017 RC Amsterdam

@pini42  www.container-solutions.com



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



Re: "try.cncf.io"

Pini Reznik
 

We are available indeed.
Will continue the conversation with Dan and Chris.

Pini

On vr 3 jun. 2016 at 12:11, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:


On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, 19:05 Camille Fournier, <skamille@...> wrote:
I got connected briefly with the folks making this:

which is I think in the general ballpark.

they contacted me off list yesterday to say they are available 

i connected them with Dan K


C

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Jon,

Noted, thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?)

I think we'd want to commission a 3rd party to do work, much as we talked about for some of the docs.

 
and b) putting the cart before the horse - as Alexis alluded to I think we have some way to go before we have a clear enough idea of the model applications etc.

Indeed.

a


 

On 2 June 2016 at 10:25, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc


_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
--

Pini Reznik

CTO - Container Solutions

Mobile: +31 (0) 6 317 99 811

Address: Korte Leidsedwarsstraat 12, 1017 RC Amsterdam

@pini42  www.container-solutions.com



Re: "try.cncf.io"

alexis richardson
 



On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, 19:05 Camille Fournier, <skamille@...> wrote:
I got connected briefly with the folks making this:

which is I think in the general ballpark.

they contacted me off list yesterday to say they are available 

i connected them with Dan K


C

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Jon,

Noted, thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?)

I think we'd want to commission a 3rd party to do work, much as we talked about for some of the docs.

 
and b) putting the cart before the horse - as Alexis alluded to I think we have some way to go before we have a clear enough idea of the model applications etc.

Indeed.

a


 

On 2 June 2016 at 10:25, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



Re: "try.cncf.io"

Camille Fournier
 

I got connected briefly with the folks making this:

which is I think in the general ballpark.

C

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:18 AM, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Jon,

Noted, thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?)

I think we'd want to commission a 3rd party to do work, much as we talked about for some of the docs.

 
and b) putting the cart before the horse - as Alexis alluded to I think we have some way to go before we have a clear enough idea of the model applications etc.

Indeed.

a


 

On 2 June 2016 at 10:25, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



F2F at DockerCon

alexis richardson
 

As things stand, some of the TOC will be at DockerCon and will gather f2f on Tuesday at 10am-12pm.  This will be an open meeting.  It will not be a meeting where voting / decisions happen because we probably won't be quorate.

Weaveworks may be able to provide a room for this (and maybe some snacks), so I'd like to get a sense of numbers.  I think we can manage up to about 20.


Re: "try.cncf.io"

alexis richardson
 

Jon,

Noted, thanks.

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:
I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?)

I think we'd want to commission a 3rd party to do work, much as we talked about for some of the docs.

 
and b) putting the cart before the horse - as Alexis alluded to I think we have some way to go before we have a clear enough idea of the model applications etc.

Indeed.

a


 

On 2 June 2016 at 10:25, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




Re: "try.cncf.io"

Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
 

I'm not totally opposed to the try idea in principle or as an end goal - my lack of obvious enthusiasm was more about a) resources (who's going to do it?) and b) putting the cart before the horse - as Alexis alluded to I think we have some way to go before we have a clear enough idea of the model applications etc.

On 2 June 2016 at 10:25, Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



Re: "try.cncf.io"

alexis richardson
 

+1 

Lee, 

I agree with you on this --- i.e that "try" services help in many ways.  I was a bit surprised by the lack of buy-in during the call.  Having said that, the call was about setting an achievable number of priorities.  If we *can* get cloud native apps & patterns into shape, then it may be more obvious how to "try" them.  

a




On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Lee Calcote via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



highlights from today's call

alexis richardson
 

All,

During today's call, there was consensus that Docs & Tests were the high priority items to focus on first, re "how CNCF helps OSS projects".  Some notes on this may be found **below the fold** of slide 7 of the deck.


Two important sub-topics got vocal support from TOC members:

1. That "example apps and patterns" be an explicit deliverable in order to clarify what it means to be cloud native.
2. That the cluster and related infra was an asset we should promote & use more.

alexis



"try.cncf.io"

Lee Calcote
 

All,

Given the CNCF’s role of promulgating a general understanding of what cloud native is, specifically how the projects governed by the CNCF provide platforms and tooling for cloud native applications, I think the “try” approach to providing easy-to-use, publically-available sandboxes is a true facilitator, couching edification of cloud native in context of the CNCF projects.

The “try” sandboxes could:

  • have walk-thru tutorials that parlay and reference the “model applications” Bryan Cantrill referred to.
  • utilize part of the (idle?) 1000-node cluster for the CNCF community 
  • be leveraged as a platform for training courses and developer certification
  • be a source of measuring interest, adoption, demographics

A page could be taken from these successes LinuxContainers.org and TryStack.org (I’ll through in Cisco dCloud as well).

I’m sure of the order of operations / speaking rules on the conference call. Apologies if I chimed-in out of turn today.

Cheers,
Lee



“(c) Promotion of the underlying technologies, and approach to application definition and management, including: events and conferences, marketing (SEM, direct marketing), training courses and developer certification


slides for TOC call today

alexis richardson
 


Re: CloudNativeDay- Last Chance to Submit a Talk

Diane Mueller
 

Katie,

I'd propose on the events call last week that we incorporate 2 panels on the day; one of TOC members to talk tech roadmap/vision and a second of community managers to talk about cross-community collaboration and CNCF community development opportunities..

Should I submit CFP abstracts for these as well? happy to do so if it keeps them on your radar

Diane

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Katie Schultz via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Hi Everyone!


Tomorrow, June 1, is the last day to submit a talk for CloudNativeDay being held in Toronto, Canada, August 25, 2016.  Please submit your talks by June 1, 11:59 pm (PDT). Click here to learn more about the Call for Papers process and to submit your talk.  


Please feel free to share the above information with your network and encourage them to submit!


If you have any questions, reach out to events@....


Best,


Katie


--
Katie Schultz
Event and Meeting Planner


The Linux Foundation
One Letterman Drive
Building D, Suite D4700
San Francisco CA 94129
T: +1.720.227.8536
E: kschultz@...
W: linuxfoundation.org and events.linuxfoundation.org

The Linux Foundation Event Experience : http://youtu.be/-WUeelICQ2U



_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc




--
Kind Regards,

Diane Mueller
Director, Community Development
Red Hat OpenShift
@openshiftcommons

We have more in Common than you know, learn more at http://commons.openshift.org


CloudNativeDay- Last Chance to Submit a Talk

Katie Schultz <kschultz@...>
 

Hi Everyone!


Tomorrow, June 1, is the last day to submit a talk for CloudNativeDay being held in Toronto, Canada, August 25, 2016.  Please submit your talks by June 1, 11:59 pm (PDT). Click here to learn more about the Call for Papers process and to submit your talk.  


Please feel free to share the above information with your network and encourage them to submit!


If you have any questions, reach out to events@....


Best,


Katie


--
Katie Schultz
Event and Meeting Planner


The Linux Foundation
One Letterman Drive
Building D, Suite D4700
San Francisco CA 94129
T: +1.720.227.8536
E: kschultz@...
W: linuxfoundation.org and events.linuxfoundation.org

The Linux Foundation Event Experience : http://youtu.be/-WUeelICQ2U



slides for TOC today

alexis richardson
 

all,


main agenda items:
- meet the GB - Craig McLuckie to join call
- simplifying what we focus on
- projects update


a


Introductions

Matt T. Proud
 

Hi all,


I am a new face for many, so allow me to take a moment to introduce myself:

With Julius Volz I am one of the co-founders of the Prometheus project.  The inspiration for the project was borne out of frustration with the inability to be easily data oriented in throughout the entire lifecycle of software development and deployment and management.  It is pleasing to see how well the public has recognized the applicability of time series databases for this purpose in just four years' time, and likewise how productivity and confidence are enhanced through democratized data oriented tooling.

I am also a software engineer at Google.  Reflections from my time at Google served as deep inspiration for answering the question of how one could be data driven and fulfill these simple software development needs.  I had started the project while I was away from Google for a few years and independent of other business entities.  [Full disclosure: I speak privately and not on Google's behalf unless otherwise noted.]  

The CNCF interests me on multiple levels.  Most notably: vision and technical alignment in the cloud space has the potential to yield tremendous benefits for its participants—I think we all recognize that.  :-)  I put the question to Alexis over a video chat this morning of how can I help and got useful suggestions, so I put the same question to you: how can I help the CNCF and you?  And do you have any other questions for me?


Looking forward to hearing from you—and pleased to meet you,

Matt



CNCF Call for Paper Deadline Reminders

Katie Schultz <kschultz@...>
 

Hi Everyone!

 

I wanted to remind you to that Call for Papers are currently open for CloudNativeDay, CloudNativeCon + PrometheusDay and KubeCon.

 

Deadlines for each are as follows:

  • CloudNativeDay: June 1, 2016
  • CloudNativeCon + PrometheusDay: August 5, 2016
  • KubeCon: August 5, 2016

 

To submit for a talk please click on the links below:

 

Please share the above information with your network and encourage them to submit!

 

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to events@....

 

Best,


Katie

--
Katie Schultz
Event and Meeting Planner


The Linux Foundation
One Letterman Drive
Building D, Suite D4700
San Francisco CA 94129
T: +1.720.227.8536
E: kschultz@...
W: linuxfoundation.org and events.linuxfoundation.org

The Linux Foundation Event Experience : http://youtu.be/-WUeelICQ2U



Re: Doodle Poll: TOC F2F Meeting- June

Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
 

Hello All,

It looks like Tuesday June 21st from 10AM-12PM PT is the best day to hold this F2F meeting. 

Solomon- can you let me know where we'll hold this meeting in Seattle so I can send out a calendar invite with details?

Thanks!

-Sarah



On Thu, May 12, 2016 7:56 AM, Chris Aniszczyk caniszczyk@... wrote:
"iv. Transparency. TOC meetings, mailing list, minutes, etc should be open."

we could invite a limited number of folks depending on the space, we should definitely publish any minutes from this meeting

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
Chris

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 3:52 PM Sarah Novotny via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
would this be a public or closed door meeting?

Can you let us know what the Charter requires in this regard please?

a



 



On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:14 PM, Sarah Saul via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Hello TOC Members,

As discussed on the call today, there was consensus to do an informal F2F meeting of the TOC in the DockerCon June timeframe in Seattle. Solomon has graciously volunteered to help out on the logistics front to host the meeting. 

Please take this Doodle Poll to determine a timeslot that works for the group. All times are in PT and I'll close the poll next Tuesday May 17th before the next TOC call. 

Best,
Sarah



Sarah Saul
Client Services Manager
The Linux Foundation
Skype: srsaul

_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc


_______________________________________________
cncf-toc mailing list
cncf-toc@...
https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc



--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719


Sarah Saul
Client Services Manager
The Linux Foundation
(M) 520-245-5185
Skype: srsaul


Tweets for Kubernetes 5/19 hackathon at OSCON Contribute

Sarah Novotny <sarahnovotny@...>
 

If you are on Twitter, please tweet some variant of below (or simply retweet the @kubernetesio tweet.)

Sarah

Join us for a #k8s hackathon at #OSCON Contribute on 5/19 from 11am-6pm. Attend free w/ code OSCON16XPO: http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/open-source-us/public/schedule/detail/51586

In Austin, TX? Join our hackathon at #OSCON Contribute on 5/19 from 11am-6pm free w/ discount code OSCON16XPO: http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/open-source-us/public/schedule/detail/51586

Become a #k8s contributor at #OSCON Contribute on 5/19 in Austin. Attend free w/ code OSCON16XPO: http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/open-source-us/public/schedule/detail/51586

Get started as a #k8s contributor at #OSCON Contribute 5/19 11am-6pm. Attend free w/ code OSCON16XPO: http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/open-source-us/public/schedule/detail/51586

Get involved with #k8s at #OSCON Contribute on 5/19 from 11am-6pm. Join us free w/ code OSCON16XPO: http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/open-source-us/public/schedule/detail/51586

Contribute to #k8s at #OSCON Contribute hackathon on 5/19 from 11am-6pm. Attend free w/ code OSCON16XPO: http://conferences.oreilly.com/oscon/open-source-us/public/schedule/detail/51586


TOC Call Cancelled- 5/18

Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
 

We are canceling this week’s TOC call due to OSCON. We’ll resume the week of 5/23. 

Best,
Sarah

Sarah Saul
Client Services Manager
The Linux Foundation
(M) 520-245-5185
Skype: srsaul

6141 - 6160 of 6383