|
TOC Agenda for 8/15/17
I hope everyone has been enjoying the summer, here's the agenda deck for 8/15: In particular, we will be hearing from the Envoy (https://github.com/lyft/envoy) project and hearing a read out from the CNCF CI WG on their cross cloud testing efforts (https://github.com/cncf/cross-cloud). We will also be discussing the Notary project proposal (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/38) and asking for any final comments on a CNCF project/maintainer survey. Thanks and look forward to chatting with everyone! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Call for Action: CloudNativeCon + KubeCon call for papers 8/21 deadline
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Please reach out to colleagues and engineers in your company and push them to submit a talk for CloudNativeCon + KubeCon which will be in Austin from 12/6-8. The deadline is two weeks away: 8/21. Submission is at https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/cloudnativecon-and-kubecon-north-america/program/cfp but I'm including suggested topics below for inspiration. 2017 Suggested Presentation Topics:Suggested KubeCon Topics:
Suggested CloudNativeCon Topics:
Suggested Fluentd Topics:
Suggested Prometheus Topics:
Suggested OpenTracing Topics:
Suggested gRPC Topics:
Suggested Linkerd Topics:
Suggested CoreDNS Topics:
Suggested Containerd Topics:
Suggested rkt Topics:
Reminder: This is a community conference — so let's try to avoid blatant product and/or vendor sales pitches. -- Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/> tel:+1-415-233-1000
|
|
|
|
Re: WG-Serverless - draft whitepaper
Doug Davis <dug@...>
yup - we have a placeholder for that type of topic and its on our todo list - but I don't think we have anything in the doc yet. So, watch this space.... :-) Thanks Doug Main ask on call last week was to zoom in more on Interoperability. How can cncf add value here? A
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, 05:41 Doug Davis via cncf-toc, <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
sorry I missed the call last week, was on vacation. Ken mentioned that I should send out a link to the latest version of the whitepaper, so here it is: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UjW8bt5O8QBgQRILJVKZJej_IuNnxl20AJu9wA8wcdI/edit?ts=59831b77#heading=h.yiaul8is1ki There are still quite a few things that need to be cleaned-up but any early comments/feedback are welcome. thanks -Doug Davis _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the more I like my dog _______________________________________________ cncf-toc mailing list cncf-toc@... https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-toc
|
|
|
|
Re: WG-Serverless - draft whitepaper
alexis richardson
Thanks Doug Main ask on call last week was to zoom in more on Interoperability. How can cncf add value here? A
On Mon, 7 Aug 2017, 05:41 Doug Davis via cncf-toc, <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
WG-Serverless - draft whitepaper
Doug Davis <dug@...>
All,
|
|
|
|
Final RFC on Notary project proposal
Hey TOC and wider CNCF community, the Notary/TUF project (sponsored by Solomon) is looking for final feedback before we formally call for a vote: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/38 Please comment on their project proposal on GitHub, if there are no formal objections to calling a vote, I plan on doing it late next week. Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Re: FYI: CNCF Project "Service Desk"
Brian Grant
This sounds great. Looking forward to it. Thanks!
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
FYI: CNCF Project "Service Desk"
At the CNCF Governing Board strategy offsite on 7/28, Alexis presented the following slides on behalf of the TOC: https://goo.gl/8QLjK6 The Governing Board and CNCF staff was very supportive of his request for more transparency in regards to the services CNCF offers (and which projects use those), along with a consistent process for projects to request services (a service desk potentially via GitHub issues). We plan to roll this out over the next month and will discuss this more at the TOC meeting today too if there any questions. Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
TOC Agenda for 8/1/17
Here's the TOC deck for tomorrow at 8am PT: https://goo.gl/ehtgts We will be hearing from the Jaeger project (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) and the Serverless WG (https://github.com/cncf/wg-serverless) along with some updates from the last strategy offsite help by the CNCF GB. Thanks and see everyone tomorrow! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Call for Action: One month to become a Founding Kubernetes Certified Service Provider
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
In early September, CNCF will be announcing the founding class of Kubernetes Certified Service Providers (KCSPs). If your company provides professional services to support Kubernetes deployments, please consider signing up to become part of the founding class. The main benefits of becoming a KCSP are: * Placement in a new section at the top of https://kubernetes.io/partners/ * Monthly private meetings with cloud native project leaders, TOC members, and representatives from the CNCF Governing Board * Access to leads from end users looking for support Requirements are: * Three or more engineers who pass the Certified Kubernetes Administrator (CKA) exam * Demonstrable activity in the Kubernetes community including active contribution * A business model to support enterprise end users, including putting engineers at a customer site The CKA exam is about to enter early release beta testing prior to the public release in September. It is an online, proctored, performance-based test that requires solving multiple issues from a command line. It takes 3 to 4 hours to complete, and costs $300, though a discount is available for beta testers to $100. If your company is interested in becoming a KCSP, please do the following 4 things: 1. Ensure that your company is listed at https://kubernetes.io/partners/ and if not (or if the listing should be updated), please do so via the link at the top of that page. 2. Have 3 or more of your Kubernetes experts sign up for the beta test at: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSd9-6nL5L3SzWIddCSPoKeuX_Pdq_KHI8C4mQzcUryP-gu0dQ/viewform . Please have them use their company email so we can properly associate them. Within a week, we will send beta test dates, a discount coupon code, and instructions to register and schedule. 3. Register your interest in becoming a KCSP at this form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSfai-zlNuvP-q0fz3jw89v3v4m_wYaF7tOBmNY0WoKsZgeQUQ/viewform 4. If you are not already on it, and want to track progress of the certification program over time, please subscribe to the Kubernetes Certification Working Group list: https://lists.cncf.io/mailman/listinfo/cncf-kubernetescertwg. Questions or issues? Please email cncf-kcsp-support@... . -- Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation <https://cncf.io/> tel:+1-415-233-1000
|
|
|
|
Re: openmetrics next steps
Richard Hartmann
Lee,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
it's every 14 days, Tuesday 1900 CEST; not sure if we will follow summer/winter or UTC once we get there. You will get an invite to the address you sent from. If you could send a short bio or something, that would be helpful. Long-term, we will document the people involved on https://github.com/RichiH/OpenMetrics along with everything else, I suspect. Reading through the files and issues in that repo will get you up to speed. RIchard
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 3:24 PM, Lee Calcote <leecalcote@...> wrote:
Richard,
|
|
|
|
Re: openmetrics next steps
Lee Calcote
Richard,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I wasn’t aware of the call on 7/18 (and missed it). When is the next call scheduled for? - Lee
On Jul 19, 2017, at 5:26 AM, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: openmetrics next steps
Richard Hartmann
Yes, carefully increasing participation is good. At the current stage,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I wouldn't want to be an artificial blocker in selection as I don't know most people (yet), anyway. "Does this person have relevant knowledge/experience and will they contribute positively" is the only hard consideration at this point. We are currently seeing some bikeshedding and feature creep; while that's always expected, overloading discussions is my main concern, atm. The Google people are networking and stackdriver with some Borgmon/Monarch experience mixed in; Fabian said he will toss the repo address and purpose into his k8s sig, but I didn't follow up on that and/or verify, yet. I shall do so, but Fabian's on holiday atm. Given the holiday season, these issues will collect and simmer for at least a few weeks before I will make a call for Rough Consensus. Richard
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:14 AM, Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
+stuart+brian fyi
|
|
|
|
Re: openmetrics next steps
alexis richardson
+stuart+brian fyi Richard IMO this planning process would benefit from *slightly* wider CNCF-TOC involvement. Do you want to select & invite people or ask Ken & Lee to do so? BTW, are the google reps in your notes also from the k8s instrumentation sig? a
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 7:17 PM, Richard Hartmann <richih@...> wrote: Hi Chris,
|
|
|
|
Re: openmetrics next steps
Richard Hartmann
Hi Chris,
sorry for being so late in replying. We didn't have the July 4th call for obvious reasons, but we had our call just now; even if quite a few people are on holiday. The GDoc is still https://docs.google.com/document/d/1q7HSZyRv4Ay4hTlva4uy8WPh5WlYv9S0Yy-xQS2vKo4/edit# but I am splitting out most questions into https://github.com/RichiH/OpenMetrics/issues so we have better exposure and tracking for those questions. Again, if you want to bounce these discussion to carefully hand-chosen people, you are more than welcome to do so. Part of my intention behind the issues is to get out of the echo chamber if whoever hapens to be in a particular call. Richard
|
|
|
|
Re: Infrakit Questions
Zachary Smith
Thanks Solomon! I also mis-used LinuxKit instead of InfraKit below. Very much still catching up with the terms right now. I also see this as very broad and there is so much that can be done with InfraKit, so I need to learn more and tinker more. Looking forward to further conversation on this. Thanks! -Zac
--
|
|
|
|
Recording/Notes from 7/11/17 TOC Meeting
Here's the recording from today's meeting, it will eventually live/trimmed down on the CNCF Youtube channel but we're dealing with some issues there: https://goo.gl/PJPRNj As a quick summary, we formally invited Notary/TUF, rook and Vitess to submit project proposals that will be voted upon by the TOC on a future date. The next TOC meeting will happen on August 1st where Jaeger (https://github.com/uber/jaeger) and Envoy (https://github.com/lyft/envoy) will present. Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
|
|
Re: Infrakit Questions
Rob Hirschfeld
Sorry... I keep doing that! InfraKit.
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 10:04 AM Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
-- Rob Hirschfeld RackN.com, CEO & Founder @zehicle, 512-773-7522
|
|
|
|
Re: Infrakit Questions
alexis richardson
do you mean Linuxkit or Infrakit, Rob?
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Rob Hirschfeld via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Infrakit Questions
Rob Hirschfeld
Solomon, Sorry for the delay - ToC meeting tomorrow reminded me that this was pending.... The Docker team has done a good job answering questions. My point is that this area has a lot of churn right now and the scope of LinuxKit is huge and evolving. Since it's very pluggable, it appears to be a "do anything." My expectation would be that narrowly defined components would be faster to bring into CNCF and something with a large scope would move slower. I'd have similar reservations about Digital Rebar in it's integrated form which is why I offered to demo it. Note: I do agree that LinuxKit and our Digital Rebar efforts are collaborative. especially on the metal provision side. Rob
On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 1:27 PM Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...> wrote:
-- Rob Hirschfeld RackN.com, CEO & Founder @zehicle, 512-773-7522
|
|
|
Alexis Richardson ---08/07/2017 10:49:15 AM---Thanks Doug Main ask on call last week was to zoom in more on Interoperability. How
