Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding) Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> schrieb am Di. 4. Sep. 2018 um 15:50:
--
Dr. Josef Adersberger QAware GmbH Geschäftsführer:
Christian Kamm, Bernd Schlüter, Johannes Weigend, Dr. Josef Adersberger |
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Carlos Arturo Quiroga <cquiroga@...>
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
https://github.com/cn-security/safe Secure Access for Everyone (SAFE) Working Group will explore secure access, policy control and safety for operators, administrators, developers, and end-users across the cloud native ecosystem Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/146 Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
wangpengfei@yanrongyun.com
+1 (non-binding)
--------------------------------------- 王鹏飞 Technical VP 北京焱融科技有限公司 手机:+86-13681265240 邮箱:wangpengfei@yanrongyun.com URL: www.yanrongyun.com
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Evan Gilman
+1 non-binding
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Yong Tang
+1
(non binding) From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Sent: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 6:50 AM To: CNCF TOC Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group A new CNCF Working Group has been proposed (sponsored by Ken Owens):
Secure Access for Everyone (SAFE) Working Group will explore secure access, policy control and safety for operators, administrators, developers, and end-users across the cloud native ecosystem
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! --
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 2:50 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: RFC: Dragonfly
Hi, Deepak Vij, Thanks for your feedback. Yes, it's a great job to support image pulling optimization in scheduling of Kubernetes. I think that the important feature you mentioned is
So, image pulling optimization you mentioned in on scheduling, while Dragonfly is mainly on Image Distribution. I think they are decoupled and only have few of overlapping. In addition, I think this feature and Dragonfly can co-exist very well to help improve image pulling. The feature decides the workload location by scheduling, and Dragonfly can improve the rest image distribution. Dragonfly takes over the image distribution for Kubernetes, and image pulling efficiency is only one part of distribution. Besides this, it also provides:
Currently all the three parts above consist of Dragonfly's service. Best Regards. Allen Sun Alibaba Group
|
|
Re: RFC: Dragonfly
Deepak Vij <deepak.vij@...>
While we are on the topic of image pulling optimizations, following granular image layers level optimizations are being worked on as part of Kubernetes Scheduling SIG future release feature: 1) Layer tracking system on each machine/node discovers the layer information from local file-system and reports this information to workload scheduler (for example, K8S scheduler in our case). 2) As part of the image resolution process for an incoming container workload, image request is decomposed to underlying layer requests. 3) Scheduler uses these two pieces of information to perform workload scheduling in accordance to the layering information on the node. Regards, Deepak Vij
From: cncf-toc@... [mailto:cncf-toc@...]
On Behalf Of AllenSun
Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2018 10:56 AM To: cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] RFC: Dragonfly
Hi, Friends,
It is my honor to give a presentation about Dragonfly to CNCF community. Dragonfly aims at covering all the image distribution in CNCF ecosystem. And currently it works perfectly within Kubernetes. My slides are in the attachment of this email.
Please feel free to give us your feedback on Dragonfly. Any thoughts on it are welcome.
In addition, I am really happy that Jonathan Boulle would like to sponsor Dragonfly to enter sandbox level. While we sincerely wish that an additional TOC member could sponsor this.
How to get help from Dragonfly's team, if you are interested in this, please don't hesitate to drop questions on me.
Thanks a lot.
Allen Sun Alibaba Group
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Zhipeng Huang
+1 non-binding :) On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 4:33 AM Ayrat Khayretdinov <akhayretdinov@...> wrote:
--
Zhipeng (Howard) Huang Standard Engineer IT Standard & Patent/IT Product Line Huawei Technologies Co,. Ltd Email: huangzhipeng@... Office: Huawei Industrial Base, Longgang, Shenzhen (Previous) Research Assistant Mobile Ad-Hoc Network Lab, Calit2 University of California, Irvine Email: zhipengh@... Office: Calit2 Building Room 2402 OpenStack, OPNFV, OpenDaylight, OpenCompute Aficionado |
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Ayrat Khayretdinov <akhayretdinov@...>
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:50 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Gou Rao <grao@...>
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:50 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Tamal Saha
+1 (non-binding) -Tamal On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:50 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
j@...
+1 (non-binding) On Sep 4, 2018, at 6:50 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Jack Cai
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Varun Talwar
+1 (non-binding) On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:12 AM Chakri Nelluri <nelcyguy@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Sunil James <sunil@...>
+1 non-binding. On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 6:50 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: RFC: Dragonfly
Hi, Friends, It is my honor to give a presentation about Dragonfly to CNCF community. Dragonfly aims at covering all the image distribution in CNCF ecosystem. And currently it works perfectly within Kubernetes. My slides are in the attachment of this email. Please feel free to give us your feedback on Dragonfly. Any thoughts on it are welcome. In addition, I am really happy that Jonathan Boulle would like to sponsor Dragonfly to enter sandbox level. While we sincerely wish that an additional TOC member could sponsor this. How to get help from Dragonfly's team, if you are interested in this, please don't hesitate to drop questions on me. Thanks a lot. Allen Sun Alibaba Group
|
|
Re: RFC: OpenMessaging
vongosling
Hi friends, Thank you for giving our team a chance to present OpenMessaging, a vendor-neutral open standard for distributed messaging and streaming on today. Please let us know of your feedback and comments to our project proposal: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/103. We are also sincerely seeking TOC sponsors to enter CNCF as a Sandbox level project. Thank you all for your time and consideration! Best Regards, Von Gosling Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> 于2018年9月4日周二 下午11:43写道:
--
Nothing is impossible |
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
Chakri Nelluri
+1 non-binding On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 11:22 AM <wenqiang.feng@...> wrote:
|
|
RFC: OpenMessaging
The OpenMessaging project was presented to the TOC today: The OpenMessaging community is seeking TOC sponsors and happy to answer any questions from the community. Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|