1. cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io
  2. Messages
   Date   
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Owens, Ken <Ken.Owens@...>
 

+1 Binding

 

Ken Owens

Vice President

Digital Native Architecture

 

Mastercard

2200 Mastercard Blvd. | O'Fallon, MO 63368

mobile +1 636-542-0923

 

From: Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 2:08 PM
Subject: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io


Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This e-mail message and any attachments are only for the use of the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, distribution or other use of this e-mail message or attachments is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail message in error, please delete and notify the sender immediately. Thank you.

Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
 

+1 binding.

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 2:52 PM, Mark Peek <markpeek@...> wrote:

+1 non-binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@linuxfoundation.org>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

 

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

 

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

 

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

 

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

 

Thanks!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Ken Owens
 

+1 Binding

On Jan 17, 2018 10:38 AM, "Chris Aniszczyk" <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Mark Peek
 

+1 non-binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 8:38 AM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

 

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

 

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

 

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

 

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

 

Thanks!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

Ken Owens
 

+1 Binding

On Jan 17, 2018 10:38 AM, "Chris Aniszczyk" <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

alexis richardson
 

+1 binding

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 3:17 AM, vongosling <fengjia10@...> wrote:
+1 non binding

Best Regards,
Von Gosling, Apache RocketMQ Founder, Linux OpenMessaging Founder

在 2018年1月18日，00:38，Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> 写道：

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd
(https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another
year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared
yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo,
CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX,
and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do
appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis
to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially
graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near
future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other
CNCF projects.

Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Tamal Saha
 

non-binding +1
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

DanW@concur.com <danw@...>
 

+1 non-binding

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

 

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io


Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



This e-mail message is authorized for use by the intended recipient only and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If you received this message in error, please call us immediately at (425) 590-5000 and ask to speak to the message sender. Please do not copy, disseminate, or retain this message unless you are the intended recipient. In addition, to ensure the security of your data, please do not send any unencrypted credit card or personally identifiable information to this email address. Thank you.

Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
 

+1 Binding

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Benjamin Hindman <benh@...> wrote:
+1 binding

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719




--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos

Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

Follow Us Twitter LinkedIn Facebook YouTube
 
 


Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Benjamin Hindman
 

+1 binding

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719




--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos

Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

Follow Us Twitter LinkedIn Facebook YouTube
 
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Solomon Hykes <solomon@...>
 

+1 binding

On Jan 18, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Zhang Lei
 

Non-binding +1

I have been played with rook.io these days and it's super dope!


---
Harry Zhang @resouer

On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

nathan_xu@...
 

Non-binding +1
 __
Nathan Xu
Shenzhen Wise2c technology Co.,ltd
Mobile：+86  13713508181

------------------ Original ------------------
Date:  Fri, Jan 19, 2018 04:08 AM
To:  "cncf-toc"<cncf-toc@...>;
Subject:  [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
 
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Andrew Randall
 

non-binding +1


On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 12:09 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io

Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719



--
Andrew Randall
Co-Founder, VP Partners & Customer Success
Tigera
andy@... | M: +1 510-520-0999 | @andrew_randall 
Follow us: Blog | Twitter | LinkedIn 

Secure Application Connectivity for the Cloud Native World
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Tony Hsu
 

Non-binding +1
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018

vongosling
 

+1 non binding

Best Regards,
Von Gosling, Apache RocketMQ Founder, Linux OpenMessaging Founder

在 2018年1月18日，00:38，Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> 写道：

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats shared yesterday from the linkerd community:

* 60+ contributors; 50+ releases (2--4 week cadence); 3400+ GH stars
* 1.5m+ Docker Hub pulls; 5--10 billion requests a day
* 1400+ Slack members
* 40+ companies using Linkerd in production. Public ones include Monzo, CreditKarma, Salesforce, Expedia, BigCommerce, NCBI, PayPal, Taboola, FOX, and AOL
* Powers the Human Genome Project!

Please vote +1/-1 (remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support).

Also note that every inception project has to be reviewed on an annual basis to decide whether it will continue to be a CNCF project or potentially graduate to another level. We will have another discussion in the near future about moving/graduating linkerd to another level, along with other CNCF projects.

Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence

Chris Aniszczyk
 

Let’s say until Feb 6th, which is the next TOC meeting. We can review at that time to see if the TOC feels there’s been enough due diligence to hold a vote or wait further.

On Jan 19, 2018, at 3:52 PM, Erin Boyd <eboyd@...> wrote:

Hi Chris,
Can we create a timeline for the DD starting with this one?
Thanks,
Erin


On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub:

It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any comments on GitHub:


Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence

Erin Boyd
 

Hi Chris,
Can we create a timeline for the DD starting with this one?
Thanks,
Erin


On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 6:27 AM, Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub:

It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any comments on GitHub:


Thanks!

--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Marius Grigoriu
 

Non-binding +1

 

From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM
To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

 

The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.

Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage systems running in cloud native environments: https://rook.io


Please vote (+1/0/-1) on the full project proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)

Jonathan Boulle <jon@...>
 

+1 binding

On 19 January 2018 at 15:16, Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...> wrote:
Non-binding +1
5721 - 5740 of 7196