|
Re: [cncf-sig-app-delivery] accelerated schedule for CNCF App Delivery SIG Charter & votes
Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
I'll be back from vacation Tue 13. Q On Thu, Aug 8, 2019, 12:43 alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: accelerated schedule for CNCF App Delivery SIG Charter & votes
alexis richardson
Doh. 12th is Monday. On Thu, 8 Aug 2019, 15:56 Alexis Richardson, <alexis@...> wrote: Hi all |
|
|
|
accelerated schedule for CNCF App Delivery SIG Charter & votes
alexis richardson
Hi all
Following a steer from Liz: Michelle and I have agreed this schedule for getting to a vote on the charter for CNCF App Delivery SIG. 12 Aug (Tuesday) Close TOC / community comments on draft charter 12-14 Aug Charter editors tidy up & create final version 14 Aug (next Wed) App Del SIG votes voting by email after F2F SIG call (@amye) then: TOC can vote on 20 Aug (Tuesday) again, voting by email after TOC F2F call - alexis |
|
|
|
Re: SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Yes - this makes sense - happy to do this. It would also serve as a means to get TOC feedback and for the SIG to raise any items that might require TOC discussion. If there are items that require a deep dive, they could even move to the SIG call directly
perhaps.
+1 from me. Thanks, Alex From: "Liz Rice via Lists.Cncf.Io" <liz=lizrice.com@...>
Sent: Thursday, 8 August 2019 12:11 To: cncf-toc@... Cc: cncf-toc@... Subject: [cncf-toc] SIG updates at TOC open meetings Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
Liz
|
|
|
|
SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Liz Rice
Hi everyone,
I’d like to suggest that every SIG should have a space on the TOC open meeting agenda to present an update. I’m picturing a summary of recent SIG outputs, upcoming plans, maybe a brief dive into any particularly interesting or contentious conclusions.
We can time-box these discussions and if there are additional questions or folks interested in a deeper dive, this could be scheduled separately.
What do you think?
Liz
|
|
|
|
Re: FYI: Kubernetes Security Audit Open Sourced
Thanks, really great work by the Kubernetes Security Audit WG to see this to completion! Folks have asked for the threat model and I've attached that here along with the output from the audit. On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 10:16 AM Ruben Orduz <orduzr@...> wrote: This is really helpful. I appreciate the expediency and fully understand the tension between transparency and disclosure embargoes and decisions therein. --
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Re: FYI: Kubernetes Security Audit Open Sourced
Ruben Orduz <orduzr@...>
This is really helpful. I appreciate the expediency and fully understand the tension between transparency and disclosure embargoes and decisions therein.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Best, Ruben On Aug 6, 2019, at 11:04 AM, Chris Aniszczyk via Lists.Cncf.Io <caniszczyk=linuxfoundation.org@...> wrote: |
|
|
|
Re: TOC Agenda for 8/6/2019
alexis richardson
thanks Sarah!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 4:02 PM Sarah Allen <sarah@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
FYI: Kubernetes Security Audit Open Sourced
Hey all, today we announced and open sourced the results of Kubernetes Security Audit: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/pull/3975 Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Re: TOC Agenda for 8/6/2019
Sarah Allen
I'll miss today's meeting. I left some comments on SIG App Charter -- seems like other folks have left comments. Assume the vote is on TOC Liaisons for the new SIG, might be good for new chairs to submit charter as a PR. It seems like the group is off to a good start and have appreciated informal discussions at SIG Security with respect to potential overlap and look forward to collaborating! Sarah On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:45 PM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
TOC Agenda for 8/6/2019
Hey all, we are meeting tomorrow: We will discuss the status of CNCF SIGs, finalizing the archiving rkt vote and working through the backlog of reviews, doc changes and upcoming annual reviews. Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
Mark Peek
+1 non-binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Aniszczyk via Lists.Cncf.Io" <caniszczyk=linuxfoundation.org@...>
Hey all, I'd like to formally call the vote to archive the rkt project based on our previous multiple discussions on this topic across a few TOC meetings.
Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread; the full proposal located here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/262
This is our first project we are archiving based on our new process so I want to be diligent and take the extra time, on top of explaining what archiving means for a project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/archiving.md
- CNCF will no longer provide support for the project via service desk
Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community.
-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Re: RFC: Keycloak project presentation
Vinod
Hi TOC,
I am an Open Source evangelist and I work in the application security domain. I am not associated with Red Hat company. I love Open Source and Open Standard and especially the software which implements open standards very well. Keycloak is a great Open Source Identity and Access Management software that implemented OpenID Connect very well. Currently, there are only a few Open Source Software in this domain and many other commercial solutions cost too much. I have used Keycloak in my workplace, it brought a tremendous security value. I think Keycloak will also help many small to medium companies to improve their security.
I believe CNCF can help Keycloak to reach a wider audience and help the organizations to implement stronger and securer Identity and Access Management for their cloud as well as user identities. Also as a project, to get stronger and mature from a wider contribution, I can see that Stian and Boleslaw have answered ( https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/176 ) the questions that TOC had, but I can't find further questions or discussion about Keycloak. I am happy to answer any questions from the perspective of an end-user. If it's needed I am happy to map and explain the CNCF TOC principles in the Keycloak project context.
Looking forward to hearing from you.
Thanks and Regards,
Vinod
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
Liz Rice
+1 binding, with thanks to everyone who contributed to rkt over the years
Liz
On 3 Aug 2019, 17:48 +0100, Steven Dake <steven.dake@...>, wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
Steven Dake
+1 NB. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
Michelle Noorali <michelle.noorali@...>
+1 binding On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:33 PM, Sebastiaan van Stijn <thajeztah@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
+1 nb On 3 Aug 2019, at 00:58, Marco Bizzantino <marco.bizzantino@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
Marco Bizzantino
+1 NB
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Regards, Marco --
Marco Bizzantino
CTO - IT Superhero
Sent from mobile
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
Ayrat Khayretdinov <akhayretdinov@...>
+1 nb On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 4:54 PM Manik Taneja <manik@...> wrote:
--
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rkt archiving
Manik Taneja <manik@...>
+1 non-binding.. Cheers, Manik Taneja On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 8:31 AM Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
|
|
