|
Proposed SIGs, September 3rd agenda item
Amye Scavarda Perrin
As we move forward on App Delivery, it's now time to review our other upcoming SIGs. https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/sigs/proposed.md has a list (that will shortly not include App Delivery). Available SIGs: - Traffic/Networking - Observability - Core and Applied Architectures Is there a group that wants to be added that isn't in this list? We'll ask on the September 3rd TOC call, so you have a few weeks. - amye Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@... |
|
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...>
Thank you! I missed it last time I looked (maybe I need new bifocals -LOL).
aimee |
|
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
It’s been done: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
-- Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000 Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation cncf.io dankohn.com or book on my calendar: dankohn.com/c On Aug 21, 2019, at 09:29, Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 9:29 AM Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...> wrote:
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Re: Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
Amye Scavarda Perrin
This is currently listed on the CNCF website: https://www.cncf.io/archived-projects/ On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 11:29 AM Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...> wrote:
--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@... |
|
|
|
Archived Project List Online - Timeframe?
Aimee Ukasick <aimeeu.opensource@...>
Hi all - I read that as part of the CNCF Project Archiving process, the CNCF will list archived projects online. Now that rkt has been archived, what is the time frame for putting the list online and where will the list be located? |
|
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
Erin Boyd
Great! I am happy about that. On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:39 AM Alexis Richardson <alexis@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Longhorn Project - SIG Storage Feedback
I'd
like to share the output of the SIG Storage process we followed for the project presentations we had from Sheng regarding the Longhorn project.
Project Longhorn was discussed in detail at the SIG call of 24th July. Recording for the session is here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8NZUqG3Mh3U The technical presentation (which has more content than the deck which is summarised for the TOC call today) is here: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1s-HypU2V9HfbTqr43IThLaQ6bAIA-DDSTPvTzg2P27U/edit#slide=id.g5ce7c38023_0_0 Following the presentation, a number of the tech leads also had a couple of followups with Sheng directly to get a better understanding of the project structure (e.g. testing processes, integration points etc...) and in general are happy to recommend the project for sandbox (following our call on Aug 14th). The SIG has drafted a short survey/questionnaire to make sure we apply a consistent approach at collecting a common set of information during a project review. This current questionnaire is geared towards a sandbox project review and should hold relevant information that the TOC will find useful when considering a project for sponsorship/review. We also made sure the capture helpful IP Policy related info. The info & questionnaire as completed by Sheng is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZAKbvTzb3wBCrgwJEjA2GKNhIhfVKPX_uSJK9gulcg4/edit?ts=5d378720 We continue to refine our process, so any feedback or ideas of what we can do better is very welcome! Let me/SIG know if you need more information or have any queries.
Kind Regards,
Alex
|
|
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
alexis richardson
The second one is better. The one thing that the TOC want to avoid is "lobbying" in which projects get pre-rolled. On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 4:36 PM Erin Boyd <eboyd@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
Erin Boyd
Alexis, This has long been an open question on process for me. Should we be addressing each TOC member individually or should the formal presentation server as the "request for sponsorship from the TOC." I sort of lean towards the second one. Thoughts? Erin On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 9:03 AM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote: Fabian |
|
|
|
Re: KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
alexis richardson
Fabian
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Have you asked all the TOC yet? alexis On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 3:58 PM Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
TOC Project Presentation Meeting 8/20/2019
Hey all, we are meeting tomorrow: The Dragonfly project is up for an annual/incubation review and we will be hearing from the KUDO and Longhorn project proposals (sandbox). Thanks! Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719 |
|
|
|
Re: CNCF copyright assignment recommendations
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
No, retaining git history of contributed files is not our recommendation. We removed that bullet to avoid confusion. -- Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000 Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation cncf.io dankohn.com or book on my calendar: dankohn.com/c On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 3:25 AM Justin Cormack <justin.cormack@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: CNCF copyright assignment recommendations
Justin Cormack
Thanks. The last paragraph implies but does not state that git history should be retained on imported (non vendored) files, should this be made explicit? Justin On Sat, 17 Aug 2019 at 23:42, Dan Kohn <dan@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
CNCF copyright assignment recommendations
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
We've had some questions in the past about CNCF's recommendations on copyright assignment, and so are pleased that the LF attorney (Steve Winslow) was able to put together such clear guidance: https://github.com/cncf/foundation/blob/master/copyright-notices.md Note that Kubernetes and other projects have already been following this approach, but it's nice to have the recommendation and reasoning in one place. -- Dan Kohn <dan@...> +1-415-233-1000 Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation cncf.io dankohn.com or book on my calendar: dankohn.com/c |
|
|
|
Re: SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Amye Scavarda Perrin
We've recently changed the TOC meeting structure: 1st Tuesday of the month is a public TOC meeting 2nd Tuesday is a closed TOC meeting 3rd Tuesday is project presentation. Our notes are always on the TOC Working Doc. On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 9:08 AM Sarah Allen <sarah@...> wrote:
--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager, CNCF | amye@... |
|
|
|
Re: SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Liz Rice
I meant the monthly public TOC meetings (1st Tue of the month, the ones that aren't dedicated for project reviews)
On 17 Aug 2019, 15:08 +0100, Sarah Allen <sarah@...>, wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Sarah Allen
I think I'm missing a little context -- I couldn't find anything in the toc repo or by searching on google referencing frequency and format of "TOC open meetings." Most meetings are public meetings and I think a few times per month would be too frequent. Does this refer to the meetings that usually happen at KubeCon/CloudNativeCon? Thanks! Sarah On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 1:58 AM Liz Rice <liz@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: SIG updates at TOC open meetings
Liz Rice
I'm going to assume that folks didn't respond because they think it's a good idea :-)
Amye, please could you coordinate with the SIG chairs and get them onto the agenda for the next public TOC meeting (Sep)? These can be *brief* updates, maybe one slide each SIG. We'll see how it works and iterate from there.
Thanks,
Liz
On 8 Aug 2019, 10:46 +0100, Alex Chircop <alex.chircop@...>, wrote:
|
|
|
|
KubeVirt Sandbox Proposal - Next Steps
Fabian Deutsch <fdeutsch@...>
Hola TOC and interested readers, a few weeks ago I've presented KubeVirt to you, with goal to find sponsors for KubeVirt submission to the CNCF Sandbox. Back then there was the ask about early adopters. By now a few adopters have spoken up on the relevant PR [0] And I'm optimistic that some more adopters will speak up over the next weeks. We were happy to see that Lic Rice from the TOC volunteered as a TOC sponsor. Now we are looking to find another sponsor in order to allow the project to enter the CNCF Sandbox. I'm available to answer any questions you might have - feel free to reach out to me on or off-list - or on the PR [0]. Greetings - fabian --- |
|
|
