|
[VOTE] Thanos for Incubation
Amye Scavarda Perrin
The Thanos project has applied for incubation: (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/342). Katie Gamanji is the TOC sponsor for Thanos, and has completed due diligence. Due diligence doc can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jJk5seSUcgwybT4nVGOzaRGrugc90uL3WCY0fUgQh1M Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread. Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support! Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@... |
|
|
|
TOC meeting tomorrow
Liz Rice
Hi everyone, Apologies, but I am going to bail out of tomorrow's TOC meeting - there are a number of very pressing deadlines demanding my attention this week and something is going to have to give. In the run up to KubeCon I imagine several of you are under similar pressures so I hope you understand and forgive my absence. Liz |
|
|
|
Question about action required from SIG-Security for OPA graduation
Torin Sandall
Hello TOC, Hopefully this is an easy question to answer 😅 Background: - We're in the process of preparing a proposal for OPA to graduate from Incubation. As part of the process, we're putting together a due diligence document for review. We'll be able to share that soon. - SIG-Security completed an assessment of OPA in October 2019: https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/pull/275. The assessment yielded useful feedback that has since been addressed. There haven't been any significant (design or architectural) changes to the project since the assessment (nor are there any planned). The question to the TOC: - What action is required from SIG-Security in the context of OPA's graduation process given they completed the assessment of OPA in October 2019? Any guidance would be appreciated. Thanks! -Torin |
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
Quinton Hoole <quinton@...>
+1 non-binding. On Mon, Jul 6, 2020, 15:06 Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
cfworking1990@...
+1 NB
|
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Julien Leloup
Also +1 from an end user.
We are using Thanos in my company from more than a year now and it has serve us perfectly. It hooks very nicely on Prometheus and its simplicity is a strong quality.
---
Best regards,
Julien Leloup
|
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Bütikofer, Benjamin
+1 On Sun, Jul 5, 2020 at 12:29 PM Katie Gamanji <gamanjie@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for a new "Steering Committee Charter"
alexis richardson
Matt Thank you for the feedback and for reviewing the proposal. I agree that the doc is light on continuity details. We have a lot of prior art on projects that face growth challenges but very little on the end state in 'bad' cases. I think it is best to talk through scenarios live. Unfortunately(*) I am on zoomcation till month end but could join a toc call in August. Until then we have email.... Alexis *Fortunately On Wed, 15 Jul 2020, 17:57 Matt Klein, <mattklein123@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Proposal for a new "Steering Committee Charter"
Matt Klein
Thanks Alexis for this doc. Overall I am supportive and I think for some projects this is a good tool to have that will aid in graduation. The one part that I am most concerned about is the section on continuity planning. My personal view is that some projects that may wish to use the steering committee to satisfy graduation requirements may not be able to produce a realistic continuity plan. This will clearly end up being a subjective assessment of the TOC to some extent, but I think we should try to have very clear guidance on what a valid continuity plan would look like as a graduation requirement. Thanks, Matt On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 2:50 PM alexis richardson <alexis@...> wrote: Hi all |
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Andrew Aitken <andrew.aitken@...>
+1
Regards,
Andrew Aitken GM & Global Open Source Practice Leader Wipro Technologies 650-704-6321
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Jennifer Strejevitch via lists.cncf.io
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 8:20 AM To: Katie Gamanji <gamanjie@...> Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Thanos Public Comment Period
** This mail has been sent from an external source. Treat hyperlinks and attachments in this email with caution** +1 nb
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 11:29, Katie Gamanji <gamanjie@...> wrote:
The information contained in this e-mail is of a confidential nature and is intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution by you is prohibited and may be unlawful. Disclosure to any party other than the addressee, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not intended to waive privilege or confidentiality. Internet communications are not secure and therefore Conde Nast does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author. |
|
|
|
Re: Cortex Public Comment Period
Martin Schneppenheim
+1 from an end user. We run Cortex for more than a year in production and since then it solves some pain points - primarily scalability issues - which we had with Prometheus. A promotion to the incubation stage is well deserved.
|
|
|
|
Re: Cortex Public Comment Period
This is definitely a great project. I love working with cortex & excited about the future of cortex. :)
+1 for Cortex incubation. |
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Owens, Ken <ken.owens@...>
+1 nb
Ken Owens Vice President Software Development Engineering
Mastercard
From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...>
On Behalf Of Jennifer Strejevitch
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 9:20 AM To: Katie Gamanji <gamanjie@...> Cc: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] Thanos Public Comment Period
CAUTION: The message originated from an EXTERNAL SOURCE. Please use caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to this email.
+1 nb
On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 11:29, Katie Gamanji <gamanjie@...> wrote:
The information contained in this e-mail is of a confidential nature and is intended only for the addressee. If you are not the intended addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution by you is prohibited and may be unlawful. Disclosure to any party other than the addressee, whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not intended to waive privilege or confidentiality. Internet communications are not secure and therefore Conde Nast does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions expressed are those of the author. |
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Jennifer Strejevitch <jennifer.strejevitch@...>
+1 nb On Sun, 5 Jul 2020 at 11:29, Katie Gamanji <gamanjie@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Joachim Kraftmayer
Another +1 from a happy end user. We replaced your timeseries monitoring setup with Thanos and allowed us to query all our metrics.
-- Beste Grüße, Joachim Kraftmayer ___________________________________ Clyso GmbH Geschäftsführer Joachim Kraftmayer Loristraße 8 80335 München Tel. (Büro): +49 89 21 55 23 91 2 Tel. (Zentrale): +49 89 21 55 23 91 0 Fax.: +49 89 21 55 23 91 9 Email: joachim.kraftmayer@... Homepage: https://www.clyso.com Handelsregister B Augsburg Registernummer: HRB 25866 USt-IdNr.: DE 275430677 |
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Joseph Irving
We've been using thanos in production since version v0.1.0 and it's greatly improved our metrics and monitoring stack, being able to aggregate all our metrics under one endpoint has made it far easier for developers to find the metrics they want, while giving us the stability and flexibility to manage a fleet of per team tailored prometheus instances. We fully support it going to the incubation stage. Joseph Irving Senior Software Engineer RVU is a trading name of uSwitch Limited, registered in England and Wales under company number 03612689. Registered address: The Cooperage, 5 Copper Row, London SE1 2LH.
This email is confidential. Access by anyone other than the addressee is unauthorised. If you've received this email in error, please tell the sender immediately and delete it. If you are not the addressee, you may not disclose, copy or rely on this email (and it might be unlawful if you do). |
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
Another +1 from a happy end user. Thanos let’s us enhance our Prometheus setup in a great way. A second +1 goes to the fantastic community.
/Federico |
|
|
|
Re: Thanos Public Comment Period
wiard@...
+1 from an end user - Thanos solves important issues. Especially in larger environments, it's almost a necessity to use Thanos (or Cortex). If we then look at the quality and usability, it is incubation worthy. Hopefully I'll be able to share my experiences using Thanos in a large organisation in the near future as I'm waiting approval for that.
Wiard van Rij |
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
Justin Cormack
+1 (binding) Justin On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:06 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
|
|
|
|
Re: [VOTE] TiKV Graduation
Jinpeng Zhang
+1 NB
|
|
|
