Date   

Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

es Zou
 

I don't think it needs to be accepted as a sandbox project. 
1. What is the purpose of acceptance? 
2. What is the difference between it and k8s? 
Finally, sandbox should not be abused.

-1

정철 <ivy@...> 于2020年8月8日周六 上午10:59写道:


+1 non-binding

Thank you,
Acornsoft,
Alex

2020년 8월 7일 (금) 오후 11:02, Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...>님이 작성:
+1 non-binding

On Aug 7, 2020, at 1:48 PM, daxmc99 <daxmc99@...> wrote:

+1 NB


Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

ivy@...
 


+1 non-binding

Thank you,
Acornsoft,
Alex

2020년 8월 7일 (금) 오후 11:02, Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...>님이 작성:

+1 non-binding

On Aug 7, 2020, at 1:48 PM, daxmc99 <daxmc99@...> wrote:

+1 NB


Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Tina Tsou
 

Dear all,

 

+1, NB.

 

 

Thank you,

Tina Tsou

Enterprise Architect

Arm

tina.tsou@...

+1 (408)931-3833

 

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> On Behalf Of St Leger, Jim via lists.cncf.io
Sent: Friday, August 7, 2020 3:59 PM
To: Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...>; CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

 

+1 non-binding.

I've been on a bit of a pseudo-vacation. Not sure votes are all tallied and done (e.g. status of this vote) or still being gathered. My positive sentiment nonetheless.

Best,
Jim

 

 

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Amye Scavarda Perrin
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 8:05 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

 

k3s has applied for inclusion into the sandbox: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/447.

Liz Rice has called for the vote: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5081

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...

IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.


Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

St Leger, Jim
 

+1 non-binding.

I've been on a bit of a pseudo-vacation. Not sure votes are all tallied and done (e.g. status of this vote) or still being gathered. My positive sentiment nonetheless.

Best,
Jim

 

 

From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> On Behalf Of Amye Scavarda Perrin
Sent: Friday, July 31, 2020 8:05 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

 

k3s has applied for inclusion into the sandbox: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/447.

Liz Rice has called for the vote: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/5081

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

 

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...


Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Jimmy Song <jimmysong@...>
 

+1 non-binding

On Aug 7, 2020, at 1:48 PM, daxmc99 <daxmc99@...> wrote:

+1 NB


Re: [VOTE] k3s for Sandbox

Dax McDonald
 

+1 NB


Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation

Li, Xiang
 

+1 binding

------------------------------------------------------------------
From:Kevin Wang via lists.cncf.io <wangzefeng=huawei.com@...>
Sent At:2020 Aug. 6 (Thu.) 02:21
To:cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Subject:Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation

+1 nb

Kevin Wang


Re: [VOTE] Thanos for Incubation

Kevin Wang
 

+1 nb

Kevin Wang


Re: [VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

zongkeshuaige@...
 

+1 non-binding


Re: [VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

stanley@...
 

+1 (non-binding)


Re: [VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

zhiyiliu@...
 

+1 non-binding


[VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

plutoligs@...
 

+1 (non-binding)


Re: [VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

Ryan
 

+1 nb 


Re: [VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

shenkh1992@...
 

+1 non-binding


Re: [VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

qingchen_job@...
 

+1 nb


Re: [VOTE] KubeEdge for Incubation

18634671213@...
 

+1 nb


Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

Rajat Vig
 

+1 NB

--
Rajat


On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:35 AM Rob Skillington <rob@...> wrote:
+1 NB

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:15 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding.

-alena

On Jul 9, 2020, at 3:45 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

Matt Young and Richard Hartman of SIG Observability have nominated Bartłomiej Płotka as Tech Lead.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4592

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...


Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

Rob Skillington
 

+1 NB

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 12:15 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding.

-alena

On Jul 9, 2020, at 3:45 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

Matt Young and Richard Hartman of SIG Observability have nominated Bartłomiej Płotka as Tech Lead.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4592

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...


Re: [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

Alena Prokharchyk
 

+1 binding.

-alena

On Jul 9, 2020, at 3:45 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

Matt Young and Richard Hartman of SIG Observability have nominated Bartłomiej Płotka as Tech Lead.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4592

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...


Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka

Ken Haines <Kenneth.Haines@...>
 

+1 NB


Cheers,

Ken



From: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Liz Rice via lists.cncf.io <liz=lizrice.com@...>
Sent: Tuesday, August 4, 2020 8:40 AM
To: Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...>; CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Tech Lead nomination for SIG Observability: Bartłomiej Płotka
 
+1 binding

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 4:15 PM Marco Pracucci <marco@...> wrote:
+1 NB

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:06 PM Justin Cormack via lists.cncf.io <justin.cormack=docker.com@...> wrote:
+1 binding


On Thu, Jul 9, 2020 at 11:45 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:
Matt Young and Richard Hartman of SIG Observability have nominated Bartłomiej Płotka as Tech Lead.
https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4592

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...