+1 (non-binding)

On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 8:14 PM Alena Prokharchyk via lists.cncf.io <aprokharchyk=apple.com@...> wrote:

+1 binding 

-alena.

On Jul 23, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

KubeEdge has applied for promotion from Sandbox to Incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/461

Alena has performed due diligence and is the TOC Sponsor.

The Due Diligence doc can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GwKZCeXbCnyBkTVwrlUflGSU7lwVgucn2CfkwrCSpsY/edit#heading=h.kd4eg2uz3lt0

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...

--

Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

+1 binding 

-alena.

On Jul 23, 2020, at 1:12 PM, Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

KubeEdge has applied for promotion from Sandbox to Incubation level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/461

Alena has performed due diligence and is the TOC Sponsor.

The Due Diligence doc can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1GwKZCeXbCnyBkTVwrlUflGSU7lwVgucn2CfkwrCSpsY/edit#heading=h.kd4eg2uz3lt0

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...

The Thanos project has applied for incubation: (https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/342).

Katie Gamanji is the TOC sponsor for Thanos, and has completed due diligence.

Due diligence doc can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jJk5seSUcgwybT4nVGOzaRGrugc90uL3WCY0fUgQh1M

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...

+1 NB

Chris, does the CNCF have an external security assessment done before graduation?

On Tue, Jul 21, 2020, 13:02 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

A simple invite for SIG Security to comment on your graduation proposal is sufficient based on the previous due diligence... "any concerns from incubation DD in addition to the standard graduation requirements"

https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc#graduation-process

I don't see a public graduation proposal from you yet so I'd get that out and invite the SIG to formally comment.

Hope that helps, but note the discretion lies with the TOC at the end of the day.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:53 AM Torin Sandall via lists.cncf.io <torin=styra.com@...> wrote:

Hello TOC,

Hopefully this is an easy question to answer 😅

Background:

- We're in the process of preparing a proposal for OPA to graduate from Incubation. As part of the process, we're putting together a due diligence document for review. We'll be able to share that soon.

- SIG-Security completed an assessment of OPA in October 2019: https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/pull/275. The assessment yielded useful feedback that has since been addressed. There haven't been any significant (design or architectural) changes to the project since the assessment (nor are there any planned).

The question to the TOC:

- What action is required from SIG-Security in the context of OPA's graduation process given they completed the assessment of OPA in October 2019?

Any guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks!

-Torin

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

A simple invite for SIG Security to comment on your graduation proposal is sufficient based on the previous due diligence... "any concerns from incubation DD in addition to the standard graduation requirements"

https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/project_proposals.adoc#graduation-process

I don't see a public graduation proposal from you yet so I'd get that out and invite the SIG to formally comment.

Hope that helps, but note the discretion lies with the TOC at the end of the day.

On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 10:53 AM Torin Sandall via lists.cncf.io <torin=styra.com@...> wrote:

Hello TOC,

Hopefully this is an easy question to answer 😅

Background:

- We're in the process of preparing a proposal for OPA to graduate from Incubation. As part of the process, we're putting together a due diligence document for review. We'll be able to share that soon.

- SIG-Security completed an assessment of OPA in October 2019: https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/pull/275. The assessment yielded useful feedback that has since been addressed. There haven't been any significant (design or architectural) changes to the project since the assessment (nor are there any planned).

The question to the TOC:

- What action is required from SIG-Security in the context of OPA's graduation process given they completed the assessment of OPA in October 2019?

Any guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks!

-Torin

--

Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

+1 binding

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 3:06 PM Amye Scavarda Perrin <ascavarda@...> wrote:

The TiKV project has applied for promotion to "Graduated" (see https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414).

Saad Ali is the TOC sponsor and has called for the vote at the end of the public comment period. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4847)

Due diligence doc can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCFeOdTIUXEkJJjaBrge8aIdovwdx4W2HngmUm5nfOA/edit#

CNCF SIG Storage has reviewed the proposal, their recommendation can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15TQERAYI-6NWj3eTGZxKJ_g3kBP9E11v1b-Gx8lFpt0/edit#

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...

Hello TOC,

Hopefully this is an easy question to answer 😅

Background:

- We're in the process of preparing a proposal for OPA to graduate from Incubation. As part of the process, we're putting together a due diligence document for review. We'll be able to share that soon.

- SIG-Security completed an assessment of OPA in October 2019: https://github.com/cncf/sig-security/pull/275. The assessment yielded useful feedback that has since been addressed. There haven't been any significant (design or architectural) changes to the project since the assessment (nor are there any planned).

The question to the TOC:

- What action is required from SIG-Security in the context of OPA's graduation process given they completed the assessment of OPA in October 2019?

Any guidance would be appreciated.

Thanks!

-Torin

The TiKV project has applied for promotion to "Graduated" (see https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/414).

Saad Ali is the TOC sponsor and has called for the vote at the end of the public comment period. (https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/4847)

Due diligence doc can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCFeOdTIUXEkJJjaBrge8aIdovwdx4W2HngmUm5nfOA/edit#

CNCF SIG Storage has reviewed the proposal, their recommendation can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/15TQERAYI-6NWj3eTGZxKJ_g3kBP9E11v1b-Gx8lFpt0/edit#

Please vote (+1/0/-1) by replying to this thread.

Remember that the TOC has binding votes only, but we do appreciate non-binding votes from the community as a sign of support!

--

Amye Scavarda Perrin | Program Manager | amye@...