|
Re: Kyverno incubation public comment period
Public comment is extended through May 25th due to KubeCon, the vote will open then.--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs, CNCF | amye@...
Public comment is extended through May 25th due to KubeCon, the vote will open then.--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs, CNCF | amye@...
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#6970
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
+1
From:cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of alexis richardson via lists.cncf.io <alexis=weave.works@...>
Date: Thursday, 5. May 2022 at 18:30
To: Liz Rice <liz@...>
Cc: Alexis Richardson via
+1
From:cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of alexis richardson via lists.cncf.io <alexis=weave.works@...>
Date: Thursday, 5. May 2022 at 18:30
To: Liz Rice <liz@...>
Cc: Alexis Richardson via
|
By
Reitbauer, Alois
·
#6969
·
|
|
TAG Security Technical Lead Nominations
Hi TOC,
The TAG Security Co-chairs would like to nominate Ragashree, Michael Lieberman, and Marina Moore as Technical Leads of TAG Security!
They have been awesome members of the community
Hi TOC,
The TAG Security Co-chairs would like to nominate Ragashree, Michael Lieberman, and Marina Moore as Technical Leads of TAG Security!
They have been awesome members of the community
|
By
Brandon Lum
·
#6968
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
There is a different sandbox logo, and projects are required to explicitly say they are sandbox whenever they mention that they are CNCF projects. The staff are pretty good at chasing up if folks
There is a different sandbox logo, and projects are required to explicitly say they are sandbox whenever they mention that they are CNCF projects. The staff are pretty good at chasing up if folks
|
By
Liz Rice <liz@...>
·
#6967
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
We need VCs to sit on their hands until Incubation
We need VCs to sit on their hands until Incubation
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#6966
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Just for a historic perspective. When we did this discussion the last time, we identified that there are fundamentally two divergent goals that we have to balance:
Projects Goal #1) Bring multiple,
Just for a historic perspective. When we did this discussion the last time, we identified that there are fundamentally two divergent goals that we have to balance:
Projects Goal #1) Bring multiple,
|
By
Brendan Burns
·
#6965
·
|
|
2022 Service Mesh Interface Annual Review Submission
Hello there!
I’d like to report that a PR for the SMI sandbox project’s annual review has been submitted: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/833. Please review at your earliest convenience.
Hello there!
I’d like to report that a PR for the SMI sandbox project’s annual review has been submitted: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/833. Please review at your earliest convenience.
|
By
Keith Mattix <keithmattix2@...>
·
#6964
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Remember, the point of cncf is not to create ways for committees to sit in judgment over projects. It is to make great projects that enable end user success. That is all.
Remember, the point of cncf is not to create ways for committees to sit in judgment over projects. It is to make great projects that enable end user success. That is all.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#6963
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Four levels would increase the total work required to assess a project through their life cycle. There might be good reasons to do it, but I don't see that it would solve the initial problem raised on
Four levels would increase the total work required to assess a project through their life cycle. There might be good reasons to do it, but I don't see that it would solve the initial problem raised on
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#6962
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Stringent implies work, judgement, and value. It seems that scaling wall has been hit already..
Stringent implies work, judgement, and value. It seems that scaling wall has been hit already..
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#6961
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
I agree on quite a few points :) Replying in line with some thoughts
> We tried SIGs (now TAGs) doing due diligence for projects. The level> of scrutiny, and the closeness to the guidance material
I agree on quite a few points :) Replying in line with some thoughts
> We tried SIGs (now TAGs) doing due diligence for projects. The level> of scrutiny, and the closeness to the guidance material
|
By
Bob Killen
·
#6960
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Which parts, specifically? I think we need consensus on a direction
before we, potentially, start new/updating processes.
Agreed. At the same time, we need to take Goodhart's law[1] into
account. A
Which parts, specifically? I think we need consensus on a direction
before we, potentially, start new/updating processes.
Agreed. At the same time, we need to take Goodhart's law[1] into
account. A
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#6959
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Richard how would you formalise this? The goal, IMO, is to reduce the subjective judgment on entry to sandbox, and increase the quantitative aspects
Richard how would you formalise this? The goal, IMO, is to reduce the subjective judgment on entry to sandbox, and increase the quantitative aspects
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#6958
·
|
|
Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation
Replying top-level as my thoughts jump across the thread.
I didn't run the numbers, yet I believe that the pace of submissions
has picked up. That alone can increase backlog.
We tried SIGs (now
Replying top-level as my thoughts jump across the thread.
I didn't run the numbers, yet I believe that the pace of submissions
has picked up. That alone can increase backlog.
We tried SIGs (now
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#6957
·
|
|
Re: LFX Mentorship '22 Summer Semester
Hello everyone!
Just a reminder that the cutoff for making project proposals is May 8th!
This is a great opportunity to have a paid mentee help with your projects.
Please open a PR with your ideas:
Hello everyone!
Just a reminder that the cutoff for making project proposals is May 8th!
This is a great opportunity to have a paid mentee help with your projects.
Please open a PR with your ideas:
|
By
Nate Waddington
·
#6956
·
|
|
Re: Kyverno incubation public comment period
+ 1 NB
--
Thanks and Regards,
Maulik Shyani
CEO
408.480.8501
+ 1 NB
--
Thanks and Regards,
Maulik Shyani
CEO
408.480.8501
|
By
Maulik Shyani
·
#6955
·
|
|
Re: Kyverno incubation public comment period
+1 NB
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Sr. Developer Advocate, AWS Kubernetes (GitOps)
TZ=America/Detroit
+1 NB
Chris Short
He/Him/His
Sr. Developer Advocate, AWS Kubernetes (GitOps)
TZ=America/Detroit
|
By
Chris Short
·
#6954
·
|
|
Re: No TOC meetings for May 3 and May 17th, TOC panel on May 18
Got it - thank you!
By
Katie Gamanji
·
#6953
·
|
|
Re: No TOC meetings for May 3 and May 17th, TOC panel on May 18
Katie,
typically whoever makes it to the event in-person :)--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Katie,
typically whoever makes it to the event in-person :)--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#6952
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26
Hello Dawn - thanks a lot for your direction here. We will surely work on the given resources. --
Hello Dawn - thanks a lot for your direction here. We will surely work on the given resources. --
|
By
Maulik Shyani
·
#6951
·
|