Remember, the point of cncf is not to create ways for committees to sit in judgment over projects. It is to make great projects that enable end user success. That is all.

Four levels would increase the total work required to assess a project through their life cycle. There might be good reasons to do it, but I don't see that it would solve the initial problem raised on

Stringent implies work, judgement, and value. It seems that scaling wall has been hit already..

I agree on quite a few points :) Replying in line with some thoughts > We tried SIGs (now TAGs) doing due diligence for projects. The level> of scrutiny, and the closeness to the guidance material

Which parts, specifically? I think we need consensus on a direction before we, potentially, start new/updating processes. Agreed. At the same time, we need to take Goodhart's law[1] into account. A

Richard how would you formalise this? The goal, IMO, is to reduce the subjective judgment on entry to sandbox, and increase the quantitative aspects

Replying top-level as my thoughts jump across the thread. I didn't run the numbers, yet I believe that the pace of submissions has picked up. That alone can increase backlog. We tried SIGs (now

Hello everyone! Just a reminder that the cutoff for making project proposals is May 8th! This is a great opportunity to have a paid mentee help with your projects. Please open a PR with your ideas:

+ 1 NB -- Thanks and Regards, Maulik Shyani CEO 408.480.8501

+1 NB Chris Short He/Him/His Sr. Developer Advocate, AWS Kubernetes (GitOps) TZ=America/Detroit

Got it - thank you!

Katie, typically whoever makes it to the event in-person :)-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Hello Dawn - thanks a lot for your direction here. We will surely work on the given resources. --

Hi Maulik, I’m not on the TOC, so I’m not sure if there were specific concerns about Matos raised during the meeting, but I do have a few suggestions for you based on our work within TAG

Thank you Amye for the update! Do we know who will represent the TOC in the panel?

+1 binding

A quick note that the TOC meetings for May 3rd and May 17th are cancelled. We have a conflict with the TOC for the 3rd, and we'll have an open TOC panel at KubeCon replacing our standard meeting for

Hello Amye and TOC, Thanks for the details below on our Sandbox project entry of Matos. Decision: Matos: Reapply in January '23 showing more robust community. We submitted our entry in December'21

What resources do sandbox projects consume? How is that resource consumption justified? IMO the main effort of a sandbox project should be getting into a position to apply for incubation, or keep

I should add, that’s not intended as a criticism - the number of very early stage applications from individuals and single vendors has increased, which over time opened up the question for the TOC