cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26

Hello Amye and TOC, Thanks for the details below on our Sandbox project entry of Matos. Decision: Matos: Reapply in January '23 showing more robust community. We submitted our entry in December'21

By Maulik Shyani · #6946 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

What resources do sandbox projects consume? How is that resource consumption justified? IMO the main effort of a sandbox project should be getting into a position to apply for incubation, or keep

By alexis richardson · #6945 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

I should add, that’s not intended as a criticism - the number of very early stage applications from individuals and single vendors has increased, which over time opened up the question for the TOC

By Liz Rice · #6944 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

A little history: the current process was supposed to be super-lightweight, to reflect the very, very low bar for Sandbox projects - essentially, is it cloud native. I don’t remember the exact

By Liz Rice <liz@...> · #6943 ·

Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability

+1 nb

By Olivier Sagory · #6942 ·

Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability

+1 non-binding Rey Lejano

By Rey Lejano · #6941 ·

Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability

+1 nb! --- Stephen Augustus (he/him) Head of Open Source augustus@... Mobile:(212) 390-0094 My working hours may not be your working hours. Please do not feel obligated to reply

By Stephen Augustus (augustus) · #6940 ·

Re: [VOTE] WG Environmental Conservation/Sustainability

+1 non binding

By claprun@... · #6939 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

By alexis richardson · #6938 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

I, for one, would love to see the sandbox process be faster and improve. With regard to moving more work to the TAGs, two things come to mind. First, when TAGs did more in the past they were

By Matt Farina · #6937 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

We have been thinking about this in TAG Observability as well, and have work in flight that’s related: * Form Program: Annual Sandbox Review [1] * Create summary slides [2] [1]

By Matt Young · #6936 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

+1 to pushing more to TAGs. Perhaps each proposed project can be assigned to a TAG and a member of the TAG can lead a technical review and guide the project's leads on criteria for acceptance. That

By Josh Gavant · #6935 · Edited

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

I like that Josh! A bit more work on the TOC side, but the paper trail is for sure a good idea. Amye, TOC members, Please chime in as well. -- Dims PS: we'll keep talking, when ready we can PR the

By Davanum Srinivas · #6934 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

FWIW, this part of the process could be made considerably more efficient for both the projects and the TOC as well. Right now, when sandbox projects are sent out and come back with answers, there's

By Josh Berkus · #6933 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

Chris, I would prefer first to beef up our existing bodies and not spread thin folks already doing too much. My personal preference. However I am not taking it off the table. It would be great if

By Davanum Srinivas · #6932 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

Just a thought, could the Sandbox process be amended to be run by a designed to be nimble, yet to be created committee/council/board? Chris Short He/Him/His Sr. Developer Advocate, AWS Kubernetes

By Chris Short · #6931 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

Alois. Big thanks for bringing this up! Some observations from me: - there are 21 applications currently in the queue, a bunch of them are resubmissions where the TOC has a set of questions and they

By Davanum Srinivas · #6930 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

+1 Agree

By Alex Jones · #6929 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

Agreed. +1 On Sat, Apr 30, 2022 at 4:25 PM Reitbauer, Alois via lists.cncf.io <alois.reitbauer=dynatrace.com@...> wrote: This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and

By Alex Chircop · #6928 ·

Re: Sandbox process needs to evolve to support cross industry collaboation

By alexis richardson · #6927 ·

1061 - 1080 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms