Folks, Please ping us on #toc channel or drop an email to the toc or private-toc mailing list if you have any questions after reviewing the video of the zoom call today. Please don't mind the short

The TOC met today to review the sandbox applications available at sandbox.cncf.io Clusterpedia - passes with a majority vote of the TOC Turnbuckle - reapply in 6 months with a more robust

Nick, Thanks for reaching out. One of the main objectives of the process is to give assurance to the end users of CNCF projects that we as a community stand behind the projects they are using (esp

Something similar did happen in the past: As part of OpenTelemetry's move from sandbox to incubation, the OpenTracing project agreed to archive itself. *Without having looked at the details, going

Hi TOC, and everyone else, With the successful launch of Envoy Gateway, there's a question about what to do about Contour's lifecycle as an incubated project in the CNCF. I firmly believe that Envoy

Great, thanks Dims - looking forward to hearing what the alternate proposal will be. Joanna sounds like a fantastic external advisor. How are others selected? What is the approval process? Thanks

Q: Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a closed group? A: We are revisiting the composition of this WG, please stay tuned for an

Celeste, Hang in there :) Don't want to lose your participation!! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 thanks, Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Thanks for the feedback Aeva, please see https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 from Arun. -- Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Josh, back to the drawing board! https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 thanks, Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Frederick, Yep, will see how to get something close to how other WGs work today. Also see https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 thanks, Dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Thanks for the feedback Libby, please see update here ( https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/7127 ) we will try to do better.-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Dawn, Yep. got that! understood. -- dims-- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Folks, FYI. Thanks for all the feedback so far on the WG structure! Please see the update from Arun. -- Dims ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gupta, Arun <arun.gupta@...> Date: Mon, Jun

Greetings! The Trickster team is pleased to share our Annual Review PR with the TOC at https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/852 Thank you, James

Hi all, I’m concerned that limiting this to TAG Leadership puts even more work on already overloaded individuals. I know that as a TAG Leader, I personally don’t have the bandwidth to attend

Agree with Aeva and others’ comments. The community should participate in defining the CoC, and be part of selecting the people responsible for representing them in maintaining the CoC. And, I

Perhaps we can separate out participation from acceptance? I don’t feel comfortable with a community code of conduct not including the community, but also think many of us will acknowledge that some

+1 to the concerns which Stephen and Josh have articulated. There were several other folks attending the BoF in Valencia who have subject expertise and volunteered to help -- but who have been

As this committee is currently structured, I do not feel that my participation in it would be productive. Regards Celeste Horgan