cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

[cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Folks, FYI. Thanks for all the feedback so far on the WG structure! Please see the update from Arun. -- Dims ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Gupta, Arun <arun.gupta@...> Date: Mon, Jun

By Davanum Srinivas · #7127 ·

Trickster Annual Sandbox Review

Greetings! The Trickster team is pleased to share our Annual Review PR with the TOC at https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/852 Thank you, James

By James Ranson <james@...> · #7126 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Hi all, I’m concerned that limiting this to TAG Leadership puts even more work on already overloaded individuals. I know that as a TAG Leader, I personally don’t have the bandwidth to attend

By Dawn Foster · #7125 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Agree with Aeva and others’ comments. The community should participate in defining the CoC, and be part of selecting the people responsible for representing them in maintaining the CoC. And, I

By Libby Meren · #7124 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Perhaps we can separate out participation from acceptance? I don’t feel comfortable with a community code of conduct not including the community, but also think many of us will acknowledge that some

By Frederick Kautz · #7123 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

+1 to the concerns which Stephen and Josh have articulated. There were several other folks attending the BoF in Valencia who have subject expertise and volunteered to help -- but who have been

By Aeva · #7122 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

As this committee is currently structured, I do not feel that my participation in it would be productive. Regards Celeste Horgan

By celeste.e.horgan@... · #7121 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Who is the "we" making these decisions? Did the General Board vote on this approach? -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Architect OSPO, OCTO

By Josh Berkus · #7120 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Let me provide some more color here. This Working Group is a "bootstrap committee" approach that will layout the foundation for CNCF CoCC. The WG is intentionally designed to include a wide range of

By Arun Gupta · #7119 ·

Re: 2022 Skooner Annual Review

Thanks Jade. Ack. On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:37 PM Jade Applegate (she/her/hers) via lists.cncf.io <japplegate=indeed.com@...> wrote: -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

By Davanum Srinivas · #7118 ·

2022 Skooner Annual Review

Hello, We are writing to let you know that we have submitted the Skooner project's annual review, available here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/850 Thank you, Jade -- Jade Applegate

By Jade Applegate (she/her/hers) <japplegate@...> · #7117 ·

Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26

For posterity, the YT playlist for those is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2Mf6GCZzW6CAk6GlZESbemB Cheers! /max

By Max Jonas Werner · #7116 ·

Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26

Sandbox Review meetings are closed meetings but they are recorded, the recording will be available on YouTube the same day as the meeting.-- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs,

By Amye Scavarda Perrin · #7115 ·

Re: CNCF Governing Board Town Hall, Developer Seats

To close the loop: We talked about this during the GB town hall itself. None of them were on the CNCF community calendar; that was an oversight, apologies. Going forward they will

By Richard Hartmann · #7114 ·

Kuberhealthy 2022 Annual Review

Hello everyone! Kuberhealthy has filed the 2022 annual review pull request for your consideration: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/848 Thanks CNCF! Eric

By Eric Greer <EricGreer@...> · #7113 ·

Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26

Hi Amye, Is the sandbox reviewing meeting open to the community? I have a proposed project that is supposed to be reviewed on June 14. I just think it might be helpful to attend the meeting. So if

By Huabing Zhao · #7112 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Karena, Currently we have one `External Advisor' which is Joanna Lee [1] (who led the BOF [2]) during kubecon and has been helping with setting up the CoCC WG. I'll leave it to CNCF staff to speak to

By Davanum Srinivas · #7111 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

Also, as follow-up questions since the eligibility requirements seem quite restrictive: Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a

By Karena Angell · #7110 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

+1 to Stephen and Josh Dims - could you please clarify what 'External Advisors' means and how they are selected?

By Karena Angell · #7109 ·

Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group

+1. If we’re saying that one of the goals is to ensure a minimum participation bound from each of these representative groups, I would maybe suggest: Allow the representative group to determine

By Stephen Augustus (augustus) · #7108 ·

881 - 900 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms