cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

+Varun and Jayant to answer that

By Brian Grant · #415 ·

Re: peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

I'd like to understand why gRPC doesn't work with HTTP 1.x

By alexis richardson · #414 ·

peanut-gallery thoughts about GRPC

Hi all, "I am not on the TOC, but" I did want to share a few thoughts about GRPC per the call the other day. I was recently at one of those moderated VC dinners where everyone gets put on the spot to

By Ben Sigelman · #413 ·

RFC: Project Proposal for Fluentd

At yesterday's TOC meeting, we discussed formalizing a Fluentd project proposal after having a great experience collaborating with the Fluentd community: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/20 For the

By Chris Aniszczyk · #412 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct

Yes

By Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...> · #411 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct

Yes. -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere See how DC/OS elastically runs containerized apps and data

By Benjamin Hindman · #410 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct

YES

By Brian Grant · #408 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct

Yes

By alexis richardson · #409 ·

[VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct

From yesterday's TOC meeting, we had discussion around adopting a code of conduct for the CNCF community. We decided to go with what the k8s community has already

By Chris Aniszczyk · #407 ·

DRAFT slides for TOC call tomorrow

All, Slides are here - https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1xbMsdJdLZzokm8Lf4-S4lr5HauOWOs46V9XSbh011ig/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136 Expected changes: - gRPC slides to be added - some mods on

By alexis richardson · #406 ·

Re: FYI: OpenTracing formally joins CNCF!

Congrats from the Prometheus side and welcome :)

By Julius Volz · #405 ·

Re: FYI: OpenTracing formally joins CNCF!

Thanks, Chris and the TOC... the OpenTracing folks are excited about this! Hopefully we'll have the opportunity to chat in person at Kubecon next month. Best wishes, Ben ᐧ

By Ben Sigelman · #404 ·

Re: FYI: OpenTracing formally joins CNCF!

Excellent!

By alexis richardson · #403 ·

FYI: OpenTracing formally joins CNCF!

I just wanted to let people know that OpenTracing has formally

By Chris Aniszczyk · #402 ·

Re: linkerd

FWIW I kicked off a thread about service meshes on the Network-SIG mailing list to gauge how those folks feel about making improvements to the k8s config model to facilitate solutions like

By Louis Ryan <lryan@...> · #401 ·

Re: linkerd

thanks Louis, that is helpful <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #400 ·

Re: linkerd

@Alexis, For taxation overheads as a strawman - a simple HTTP/1.1 roundtrip latency percentile distribution at 10^n (n = 2..5) qps with a 4k response payload - CPU time measurement of the proxy under

By Louis Ryan <lryan@...> · #399 ·

Re: linkerd

We have HTTP/2 in alpha. Gory details here: https://github.com/BuoyantIO/linkerd/issues/174 Performance: a heady topic. That post is still accurate. Note that it's focused on a sidecar / low-mem

By William Morgan · #398 ·

Re: linkerd

"standardized assessment" meaning "assessment"? or do you have something in mind?

By alexis richardson · #397 ·

Re: linkerd

I think it would be useful to have some standardized assessment of the CPU, latency & memory footprint tax that products in this space have. A feature comparison matrix would be nice too.

By Louis Ryan <lryan@...> · #396 ·

7581 - 7600 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms