|
Re: Security policies for Kubernetes
It's also worth noting that precisely because the Linux kernel team put out a release every single week the scheduling of IT resources for deployment is not a problem. People know in advance when your
It's also worth noting that precisely because the Linux kernel team put out a release every single week the scheduling of IT resources for deployment is not a problem. People know in advance when your
|
By
Nicko van Someren <nicko@...>
·
#476
·
|
|
Re: Security policies for Kubernetes
That's interesting feedback. I was speaking to the VP of infrastructure at a major bank last week and he said that having a heads up from OpenSSL helps him hugely and he wished that more projects did
That's interesting feedback. I was speaking to the VP of infrastructure at a major bank last week and he said that having a heads up from OpenSSL helps him hugely and he wished that more projects did
|
By
Nicko van Someren <nicko@...>
·
#475
·
|
|
Re: Security policies for Kubernetes
I think you might want to reconsider that, as over beers, the OpenSSL
team says that this type of thing really doesn't work and just causes
more problems...
But hey, remember that I'm on a project
I think you might want to reconsider that, as over beers, the OpenSSL
team says that this type of thing really doesn't work and just causes
more problems...
But hey, remember that I'm on a project
|
By
Greg KH <gregkh@...>
·
#474
·
|
|
Re: Security policies for Kubernetes
Hi Alexis,
Thanks for that. I read through the Google Doc and added some comments.
One thing I think would be valuable to include in the security process is for there to be a broadcast mail to some
Hi Alexis,
Thanks for that. I read through the Google Doc and added some comments.
One thing I think would be valuable to include in the security process is for there to be a broadcast mail to some
|
By
Nicko van Someren <nicko@...>
·
#473
·
|
|
Re: Security policies for Kubernetes
Hi, Twistlock is a member and is a Container security company. We have been working with Google/GCP/Kubernetes for some time. We'd love to contribute. We'll start on the Github thread.
Chenxi
--
Hi, Twistlock is a member and is a Container security company. We have been working with Google/GCP/Kubernetes for some time. We'd love to contribute. We'll start on the Github thread.
Chenxi
--
|
By
Chenxi Wang <chenxi@...>
·
#472
·
|
|
Re: Security policies for Kubernetes
+nicko
By
alexis richardson
·
#471
·
|
|
Security policies for Kubernetes
There was a question at the Kubernetes panel Monday night about how to handle security reports now that Kubernetes is a CNCF rather than a Google project.
Brandon Phillips seems to have already gotten
There was a question at the Kubernetes panel Monday night about how to handle security reports now that Kubernetes is a CNCF rather than a Google project.
Brandon Phillips seems to have already gotten
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#470
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
hooray
<caniszczyk@...> wrote:
hooray
<caniszczyk@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#469
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
Yes we are all set Alexis, the official announcement will go out this morning:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/20#issuecomment-259040513
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
Yes we are all set Alexis, the official announcement will go out this morning:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/20#issuecomment-259040513
--
Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#468
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
I believe that means we have six YES votes and Fluentd accepted.
Chris, please let us know when the voting officially 'closes'.
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
I believe that means we have six YES votes and Fluentd accepted.
Chris, please let us know when the voting officially 'closes'.
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#467
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
Yes
By
Camille Fournier
·
#466
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
Yes.
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Yes.
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
By
Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
·
#465
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
Yes
By
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
·
#464
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
Yes
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Build and run modern apps
at scale using DC/OS
Yes
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Build and run modern apps
at scale using DC/OS
|
By
Benjamin Hindman
·
#463
·
|
|
Important - CNCF TOC Graduation Criteria
Hi all
If you missed today's call please DO take a look at the Graduation
Criteria. I think we are close to something that can be voted on.
For example, we have been able to define language for
Hi all
If you missed today's call please DO take a look at the Graduation
Criteria. I think we are close to something that can be voted on.
For example, we have been able to define language for
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#462
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
+1
-Ram
By
Ram, J <j.ram@...>
·
#461
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] End User Reference Architecture v1.0
YES
By
Camille Fournier
·
#460
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
YES
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
YES
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#459
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Fluentd Project Proposal
YES
By
Brian Grant
·
#458
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Code of Conduct
Sorry I missed this when it was first put up for a vote -- +1!
- Bryan
Sorry I missed this when it was first put up for a vote -- +1!
- Bryan
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#457
·
|