|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1
By
Camille Fournier
·
#619
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1
On February 15, 2017 at 10:24:40 PM PST, Yash Thakkar via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
+1
On February 15, 2017 at 10:24:40 PM PST, Yash Thakkar via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:
|
By
Bernstein, Joshua <Joshua.Bernstein@...>
·
#618
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1 (uncountable vote). Would like to share my support for the project.
+1 (uncountable vote). Would like to share my support for the project.
|
By
Ihor Dvoretskyi
·
#617
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
Thanks for pointing this out Brian, the project proposal states that gRPC is coming under "incubating" not inception which was wrongly worded in my email summary of the vote:
Thanks for pointing this out Brian, the project proposal states that gRPC is coming under "incubating" not inception which was wrongly worded in my email summary of the vote:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#616
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
(+1 obviously, since I'm the sponsor, but...)
What's the rationale behind inception vs incubation?
Is there some incubation criterion that we think grpc doesn't satisfy?
(+1 obviously, since I'm the sponsor, but...)
What's the rationale behind inception vs incubation?
Is there some incubation criterion that we think grpc doesn't satisfy?
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#615
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1!
- Bryan
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#614
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1
--
Thanks,
Yash Thakkar
+1
--
Thanks,
Yash Thakkar
|
By
Yash Thakkar
·
#613
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
+1
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
|
By
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
·
#612
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1
Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> schrieb am Mi., 15. Feb. 2017, 18:11:
+1
Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> schrieb am Mi., 15. Feb. 2017, 18:11:
|
By
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
·
#611
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_117623181166990"
----_com.samsung.android.email_117623181166990
Content-Type: text/plain;
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--_com.samsung.android.email_117623181166990"
----_com.samsung.android.email_117623181166990
Content-Type: text/plain;
|
By
Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...>
·
#610
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] gRPC project proposal
+1
By
alexis richardson
·
#609
·
|
|
[VOTE] gRPC project proposal
Hey CNCF TOC community, it's time to vote on the gRPC (http://www.grpc.io/) proposal as an inception level project, you can view the proposal below in this email or on
Hey CNCF TOC community, it's time to vote on the gRPC (http://www.grpc.io/) proposal as an inception level project, you can view the proposal below in this email or on
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#608
·
|
|
Reminder: CNCF TOC Weekly Meeting (February 15, 2017)
CNCF TOC Community,
Reminder that the TOC will be meeting on Wednesday, February 15, from 3:40pm - 5:10pm PT sharp.
Dial-in: https://www.uberconference.com/cloudnative or +1-415-579-0198 No PIN
For
CNCF TOC Community,
Reminder that the TOC will be meeting on Wednesday, February 15, from 3:40pm - 5:10pm PT sharp.
Dial-in: https://www.uberconference.com/cloudnative or +1-415-579-0198 No PIN
For
|
By
Brett Preston <bpreston@...>
·
#607
·
|
|
Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon
Dynamic, or horizontal....
--
Scott McCarty, RHCA
Technical Product Marketing: Containers
Email: smccarty@...
Phone: 312-660-3535
Cell: 330-807-1043
Web: http://crunchtools.com
When
Dynamic, or horizontal....
--
Scott McCarty, RHCA
Technical Product Marketing: Containers
Email: smccarty@...
Phone: 312-660-3535
Cell: 330-807-1043
Web: http://crunchtools.com
When
|
By
Scott McCarty
·
#606
·
|
|
Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon
Andy, I like dynamically scalable. That's much better.
I'd also like to add that what we're proposing here is that people can get any or all of those 3 by going cloud native. I think that's an
Andy, I like dynamically scalable. That's much better.
I'd also like to add that what we're proposing here is that people can get any or all of those 3 by going cloud native. I think that's an
|
By
Mark Coleman <mark@...>
·
#605
·
|
|
Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Agreed. I can only remember about 3 of the 12-factors :-)
<cncf-toc@...> wrote:
Agreed. I can only remember about 3 of the 12-factors :-)
|
By
Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@...>
·
#604
·
|
|
Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon
I think we should aim for 3 core principles. Any more than that and people won't be able to repeat as a mantra.
Currently the charter has:
- container packaged
- dynamically managed
- micro-services
I think we should aim for 3 core principles. Any more than that and people won't be able to repeat as a mantra.
Currently the charter has:
- container packaged
- dynamically managed
- micro-services
|
By
Andrew Randall
·
#603
·
|
|
Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon
I agree that we may need to think more about how we communicate about microservices, but do we agree that the underlying purpose of cloud native is:
1. Speed of change (I used to refer to this as
I agree that we may need to think more about how we communicate about microservices, but do we agree that the underlying purpose of cloud native is:
1. Speed of change (I used to refer to this as
|
By
Mark Coleman <mark@...>
·
#602
·
|
|
Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon
Microservices are cloud native because they are a natural product of the ease of use for cloud. In a evolutionary way I would call them absolutely cloud native, which doesn't mean one must use them to
Microservices are cloud native because they are a natural product of the ease of use for cloud. In a evolutionary way I would call them absolutely cloud native, which doesn't mean one must use them to
|
By
Camille Fournier
·
#601
·
|
|
Re: Interesting tech marketing from Amazon
Yes, I don't think microservices is a core value. It's one of several modern cloud native patterns that is useful for some organisational and technical issues. But not the only one.
Yes, I don't think microservices is a core value. It's one of several modern cloud native patterns that is useful for some organisational and technical issues. But not the only one.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#600
·
|