|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Agree with Aeva and others’ comments. The community should participate in defining the CoC, and be part of selecting the people responsible for representing them in maintaining the CoC.
And, I
Agree with Aeva and others’ comments. The community should participate in defining the CoC, and be part of selecting the people responsible for representing them in maintaining the CoC.
And, I
|
By
Libby Meren
·
#7124
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Perhaps we can separate out participation from acceptance?
I don’t feel comfortable with a community code of conduct not including the community, but also think many of us will acknowledge that some
Perhaps we can separate out participation from acceptance?
I don’t feel comfortable with a community code of conduct not including the community, but also think many of us will acknowledge that some
|
By
Frederick Kautz
·
#7123
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
+1 to the concerns which Stephen and Josh have articulated. There were several other folks attending the BoF in Valencia who have subject expertise and volunteered to help -- but who have been
+1 to the concerns which Stephen and Josh have articulated. There were several other folks attending the BoF in Valencia who have subject expertise and volunteered to help -- but who have been
|
By
Aeva
·
#7122
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
As this committee is currently structured, I do not feel that my participation in it would be productive.
Regards
Celeste Horgan
As this committee is currently structured, I do not feel that my participation in it would be productive.
Regards
Celeste Horgan
|
By
celeste.e.horgan@...
·
#7121
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Who is the "we" making these decisions? Did the General Board vote on this approach?
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
Who is the "we" making these decisions? Did the General Board vote on this approach?
--
-- Josh Berkus
Kubernetes Community Architect
OSPO, OCTO
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7120
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Let me provide some more color here.
This Working Group is a "bootstrap committee" approach that will layout the foundation for CNCF CoCC. The WG is intentionally designed to include a wide range of
Let me provide some more color here.
This Working Group is a "bootstrap committee" approach that will layout the foundation for CNCF CoCC. The WG is intentionally designed to include a wide range of
|
By
Arun Gupta
·
#7119
·
|
|
Re: 2022 Skooner Annual Review
Thanks Jade. Ack.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:37 PM Jade Applegate (she/her/hers) via lists.cncf.io <japplegate=indeed.com@...> wrote:
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
Thanks Jade. Ack.
On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:37 PM Jade Applegate (she/her/hers) via lists.cncf.io <japplegate=indeed.com@...> wrote:
--
Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7118
·
|
|
2022 Skooner Annual Review
Hello,
We are writing to let you know that we have submitted the Skooner project's annual review, available here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/850
Thank you,
Jade
--
Jade Applegate
Hello,
We are writing to let you know that we have submitted the Skooner project's annual review, available here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/850
Thank you,
Jade
--
Jade Applegate
|
By
Jade Applegate (she/her/hers) <japplegate@...>
·
#7117
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26
For posterity, the YT playlist for those is
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2Mf6GCZzW6CAk6GlZESbemB
Cheers!
/max
For posterity, the YT playlist for those is
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2Mf6GCZzW6CAk6GlZESbemB
Cheers!
/max
|
By
Max Jonas Werner
·
#7116
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26
Sandbox Review meetings are closed meetings but they are recorded, the recording will be available on YouTube the same day as the meeting.--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs,
Sandbox Review meetings are closed meetings but they are recorded, the recording will be available on YouTube the same day as the meeting.--
Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs,
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#7115
·
|
|
Re: CNCF Governing Board Town Hall, Developer Seats
To close the loop: We talked about this during the GB town hall itself.
None of them were on the CNCF community calendar; that was an
oversight, apologies. Going forward they will
To close the loop: We talked about this during the GB town hall itself.
None of them were on the CNCF community calendar; that was an
oversight, apologies. Going forward they will
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#7114
·
|
|
Kuberhealthy 2022 Annual Review
Hello everyone!
Kuberhealthy has filed the 2022 annual review pull request for your consideration: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/848
Thanks CNCF!
Eric
Hello everyone!
Kuberhealthy has filed the 2022 annual review pull request for your consideration: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/848
Thanks CNCF!
Eric
|
By
Eric Greer <EricGreer@...>
·
#7113
·
|
|
Re: Results from Sandbox Inclusion Meeting, April 26
Hi Amye,
Is the sandbox reviewing meeting open to the community?
I have a proposed project that is supposed to be reviewed on June 14. I just think it might be helpful to attend the meeting. So if
Hi Amye,
Is the sandbox reviewing meeting open to the community?
I have a proposed project that is supposed to be reviewed on June 14. I just think it might be helpful to attend the meeting. So if
|
By
Huabing Zhao
·
#7112
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Karena,
Currently we have one `External Advisor' which is Joanna Lee [1] (who led the BOF [2]) during kubecon and has been helping with setting up the CoCC WG. I'll leave it to CNCF staff to speak to
Karena,
Currently we have one `External Advisor' which is Joanna Lee [1] (who led the BOF [2]) during kubecon and has been helping with setting up the CoCC WG. I'll leave it to CNCF staff to speak to
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7111
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Also, as follow-up questions since the eligibility requirements seem quite restrictive:
Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a
Also, as follow-up questions since the eligibility requirements seem quite restrictive:
Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a
|
By
Karena Angell
·
#7110
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
+1 to Stephen and Josh
Dims - could you please clarify what 'External Advisors' means and how they are selected?
+1 to Stephen and Josh
Dims - could you please clarify what 'External Advisors' means and how they are selected?
|
By
Karena Angell
·
#7109
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
+1.
If we’re saying that one of the goals is to ensure a minimum participation bound from each of these representative groups, I would maybe suggest:
Allow the representative group to determine
+1.
If we’re saying that one of the goals is to ensure a minimum participation bound from each of these representative groups, I would maybe suggest:
Allow the representative group to determine
|
By
Stephen Augustus (augustus)
·
#7108
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
+1
By
Vincent Batts
·
#7107
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
That was what I assumed when each group was asked to appoint someone. In TAG-CS, we were already discussing who we would nominate.
However, TAG chairs and core maintainers are the most overcommitted
That was what I assumed when each group was asked to appoint someone. In TAG-CS, we were already discussing who we would nominate.
However, TAG chairs and core maintainers are the most overcommitted
|
By
Josh Berkus
·
#7106
·
|
|
Re: [cncf-gb] Formation of CNCF CoC Update Working Group
Hi Josh,
good question! we had competing interests (size of WG to ensure it's not too big to do its work vs broad criteria to accommodate folks from various bodies)
most of the bodies, you can see
Hi Josh,
good question! we had competing interests (size of WG to ensure it's not too big to do its work vs broad criteria to accommodate folks from various bodies)
most of the bodies, you can see
|
By
Davanum Srinivas
·
#7105
·
|