Agree with Aeva and others’ comments. The community should participate in defining the CoC, and be part of selecting the people responsible for representing them in maintaining the CoC. And, I

Perhaps we can separate out participation from acceptance? I don’t feel comfortable with a community code of conduct not including the community, but also think many of us will acknowledge that some

+1 to the concerns which Stephen and Josh have articulated. There were several other folks attending the BoF in Valencia who have subject expertise and volunteered to help -- but who have been

As this committee is currently structured, I do not feel that my participation in it would be productive. Regards Celeste Horgan

Who is the "we" making these decisions? Did the General Board vote on this approach? -- -- Josh Berkus Kubernetes Community Architect OSPO, OCTO

Let me provide some more color here. This Working Group is a "bootstrap committee" approach that will layout the foundation for CNCF CoCC. The WG is intentionally designed to include a wide range of

Thanks Jade. Ack. On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 12:37 PM Jade Applegate (she/her/hers) via lists.cncf.io <japplegate=indeed.com@...> wrote: -- Davanum Srinivas :: https://twitter.com/dims

Hello, We are writing to let you know that we have submitted the Skooner project's annual review, available here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/850 Thank you, Jade -- Jade Applegate

For posterity, the YT playlist for those is https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLj6h78yzYM2Mf6GCZzW6CAk6GlZESbemB Cheers! /max

Sandbox Review meetings are closed meetings but they are recorded, the recording will be available on YouTube the same day as the meeting.-- Amye Scavarda Perrin | Director of Developer Programs,

To close the loop: We talked about this during the GB town hall itself. None of them were on the CNCF community calendar; that was an oversight, apologies. Going forward they will

Hello everyone! Kuberhealthy has filed the 2022 annual review pull request for your consideration: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/848 Thanks CNCF! Eric

Hi Amye, Is the sandbox reviewing meeting open to the community? I have a proposed project that is supposed to be reviewed on June 14. I just think it might be helpful to attend the meeting. So if

Karena, Currently we have one `External Advisor' which is Joanna Lee [1] (who led the BOF [2]) during kubecon and has been helping with setting up the CoCC WG. I'll leave it to CNCF staff to speak to

Also, as follow-up questions since the eligibility requirements seem quite restrictive: Will this Working Group be held in an open forum similar to other CNCF Working Groups or is this suggesting a

+1 to Stephen and Josh Dims - could you please clarify what 'External Advisors' means and how they are selected?

+1. If we’re saying that one of the goals is to ensure a minimum participation bound from each of these representative groups, I would maybe suggest: Allow the representative group to determine

+1

That was what I assumed when each group was asked to appoint someone. In TAG-CS, we were already discussing who we would nominate. However, TAG chairs and core maintainers are the most overcommitted

Hi Josh, good question! we had competing interests (size of WG to ensure it's not too big to do its work vs broad criteria to accommodate folks from various bodies) most of the bodies, you can see