imho it makes sense, would love to see the storage wg start working here in the open: https://github.com/cncf/wg-storage -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

+benh

Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that gRPC (https://grpc.io) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/23 binding +1 TOC votes (8/9): - Alexis

We are making some updates to the doc based on some of the feedback. I do agree, we need to show how cloud native is different in terms of how you deploy and rebuild a POD, but I also believe

here https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1fOrZNcQpm8C1CghcK8bowyEWrIidrBL4lMi9OByNr6g/edit?ts=58b5fd42#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136

Also, Camille, please note that CoreDNS (along with all of the other smaller projects) will be holding a salon at CloudNativeCon/KubeCon Berlin on March 30, at which we're hoping to attract new users,

Please make your SOC related requests on GitHub by filing a GitHub issue: https://github.com/cncf/soc Thanks! -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Hi, I am a pre final year B.Tech and MS by research student at International Institute of Information Technology, Hyderabad. I am proficient in python, C++ and Java. I am interested in contributing

Agreed. This comes up often; we need documentation resources about the projects and on how these projects compare/contrast with vendor-supported solutions. Best, Swarna. On Feb 27, 2017, 6:41 AM

good advice, thank-you

I'm +1, with the strong encouragement for this project to find more active committers. It really looks like a one-person show right now. Comparing to our other inception project, which has 7 people

+1 good topic. <jonathan.boulle@...> wrote:

I'd like to talk again about the CNCF providing documentation resources for projects.

all, post the Tahoe f2f we agreed to run with a more "open agenda" for TOC calls. PLEASE feel free to post topics to this thread over next 24 hours, and I'll work with Chris A to devise an Agenda

CNCF will be sponsoring and helping to program content for the events below. We would encourage you to have engineers from your companies propose talks on Kubernetes and other cloud native related

Alex, I agree with Clinton’s point that we want to focus on what makes Cloud-Native different, not sure covering all the legacy Storage protocols serves that purpose There are too many users

Clinton / Yaron, Thank you for the feedback. We will get some of that added to the doc, although we were thinking of covering some of those topics in more depth in future articles. We’ll

If you are interested in hearing about the progress of the CI working group, I am planning on using the CI mailing list for public discussion. Please join that mailing list,

Alex, Sorry for the late review. My concern currently is that the document spends 80% of the time talking about what is known about some storage platforms today and the last portion discussing what

I wrote a post a while ago on impact of Cloud-Native on Storage, can reuse its content, you may want to take the abstraction to the next level just like we did on compute (from VMs to