|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Sounds good, let's get this on agenda for May, probably first call on May 3
Sounds good, let's get this on agenda for May, probably first call on May 3
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#845
·
|
|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
That would be helpful.
--
--Swarna.
That would be helpful.
--
--Swarna.
|
By
Swarna Podila <swarna@...>
·
#844
·
|
|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
+1 for CNCF community at large.
Best
--
Duncan Johnston-Watt
CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
+44 777 190 2653 | @duncanjw
Sent from my iPhone
+1 for CNCF community at large.
Best
--
Duncan Johnston-Watt
CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
+44 777 190 2653 | @duncanjw
Sent from my iPhone
|
By
Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...>
·
#843
·
|
|
Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Hi all, this week Docker launched an important new project: the Moby project (http://mobyproject.org). Moby will allow Docker to better collaborate with the ecosystem in general, and the CNCF in
Hi all, this week Docker launched an important new project: the Moby project (http://mobyproject.org). Moby will allow Docker to better collaborate with the ecosystem in general, and the CNCF in
|
By
Solomon Hykes <solomon.hykes@...>
·
#842
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
Sugu
Thank-you. Those are good reasons! Are there specific places where
you'd like help winning or keeping more contributors?
Look forward to your view on systems & tradeoffs. Can I humbly
Sugu
Thank-you. Those are good reasons! Are there specific places where
you'd like help winning or keeping more contributors?
Look forward to your view on systems & tradeoffs. Can I humbly
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#841
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
Hi Chris, Alexis,
For the license, we already intend to change it to ALv2: https://github.com/youtube/vitess/issues/2694.
For the comparison of various systems and trade-offs, we'll try to put
Hi Chris, Alexis,
For the license, we already intend to change it to ALv2: https://github.com/youtube/vitess/issues/2694.
For the comparison of various systems and trade-offs, we'll try to put
|
By
Sugu Sougoumarane
·
#840
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
Also in terms of process, I believe Brian Grant on today's call has expressed interest in sponsoring the project from the TOC. I'd suggest at a following or next TOC meeting to decide whether the TOC
Also in terms of process, I believe Brian Grant on today's call has expressed interest in sponsoring the project from the TOC. I'd suggest at a following or next TOC meeting to decide whether the TOC
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#839
·
|
|
Vitess follow up
Sugu
Thank you again for your pres today.
What would *help Vitess the most* from a project advancement & end user POV? How can CNCF help?
a
Sugu
Thank you again for your pres today.
What would *help Vitess the most* from a project advancement & end user POV? How can CNCF help?
a
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#838
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
mmm I need to double check into the thread. Let's keep this out. I will confirm next meeting :)
2017-04-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>:
--
Gianluca Arbezzano
www.gianarb.it
mmm I need to double check into the thread. Let's keep this out. I will confirm next meeting :)
2017-04-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>:
--
Gianluca Arbezzano
www.gianarb.it
|
By
Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@...>
·
#837
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
Gianluca, has Camille reviewed this?
Gianluca, has Camille reviewed this?
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#836
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
I am happy to share something about this proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16sCYq5EcB9_NFmnjtQ6WYmQ6tmt6CxYzsDL2ibrqPK8/edit#heading=h.lecnlkp0qpeq
I shared it via wg-ci some week ago, in
I am happy to share something about this proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16sCYq5EcB9_NFmnjtQ6WYmQ6tmt6CxYzsDL2ibrqPK8/edit#heading=h.lecnlkp0qpeq
I shared it via wg-ci some week ago, in
|
By
Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@...>
·
#835
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
With my apologies for the late notice, I'm unable to make the call this morning due to a meeting that I can't move; talk to you in two weeks.
- Bryan
With my apologies for the late notice, I'm unable to make the call this morning due to a meeting that I can't move; talk to you in two weeks.
- Bryan
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#834
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
The doc hasn't really been touched in a while so we might have all the reviews/comments we're going to get. I did a little bit of clean-up around the "What should a CNCF WG do in this space?" section
The doc hasn't really been touched in a while so we might have all the reviews/comments we're going to get. I did a little bit of clean-up around the "What should a CNCF WG do in this space?" section
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#833
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
thanks Mark! can you be sure to remind me & chris to get this discussed in the next TOC in 2-3 weeks?
feel free to add reminder to today's TOC deck
thanks Mark! can you be sure to remind me & chris to get this discussed in the next TOC in 2-3 weeks?
feel free to add reminder to today's TOC deck
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#832
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
Given dockercon might take away availability and attention I’d be fine with moving further serverless discussion out to the next meeting. Perhaps a reminder to review/comment on the notes
Given dockercon might take away availability and attention I’d be fine with moving further serverless discussion out to the next meeting. Perhaps a reminder to review/comment on the notes
|
By
Mark Peek
·
#831
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
thanks Chris
** urgent ** if anyone has any adds for today please shout out.
eg: do we want to have a recap on next steps for Serverless
discussion, or wait till after
thanks Chris
** urgent ** if anyone has any adds for today please shout out.
eg: do we want to have a recap on next steps for Serverless
discussion, or wait till after
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#830
·
|
|
Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
Here's the draft agenda deck for tomorrow: https://goo.gl/1PJscF
The main topics are:
- Networking WG Update / Recommendations
- Community presentation from Vitess
Here's the draft agenda deck for tomorrow: https://goo.gl/1PJscF
The main topics are:
- Networking WG Update / Recommendations
- Community presentation from Vitess
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#829
·
|
|
Kubernetes Panel and Reception in Austin, a CNCF Sponsored Event, 6 PM Mon 4/17
Hello,
Please join the CNCF, CoreOS and Google Cloud Platform for a panel and reception where you can mingle and hear from some of the experts in the Kubernetes community. It will be held at 6 PM on
Hello,
Please join the CNCF, CoreOS and Google Cloud Platform for a panel and reception where you can mingle and hear from some of the experts in the Kubernetes community. It will be held at 6 PM on
|
By
Katie Schultz <kschultz@...>
·
#828
·
|
|
CNCF K8s Conformance WG Meeting Monday, 4/17 3:30 PM at DockerCon Austin
CNCF is forming a working group to discuss Kubernetes Software Conformance and the potential for an associated branding program for conformant implementations. If your company provides software based
CNCF is forming a working group to discuss Kubernetes Software Conformance and the potential for an associated branding program for conformant implementations. If your company provides software based
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#827
·
|
|
Re: The Cloud-Nativity of Serverless
Hello all,
Sorry to join the discussion so late. I've added comments to the document, but I also wanted to present some thoughts more directly.
I work at iRobot, and we transitioned our fleet of
Hello all,
Sorry to join the discussion so late. I've added comments to the document, but I also wanted to present some thoughts more directly.
I work at iRobot, and we transitioned our fleet of
|
By
Kehoe, Ben <bkehoe@...>
·
#826
·
|