|
Re: Doodle Poll: TOC F2F Meeting- June
would this be a public or closed door meeting?
would this be a public or closed door meeting?
|
By
Sarah Novotny <sarahnovotny@...>
·
#219
·
|
|
Re: Mozilla Open Source Support (MOSS): Now Open To All Projects | The Mozilla Blog
That's right. One day, companies who sponsor CNCF might see fit to publish "RFPs" and "RFQs" for extension points of OSS in CNCF. These could operate on a bounty-type system.
That's right. One day, companies who sponsor CNCF might see fit to publish "RFPs" and "RFQs" for extension points of OSS in CNCF. These could operate on a bounty-type system.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#218
·
|
|
Doodle Poll: TOC F2F Meeting- June
Hello TOC Members,
As discussed on the call today, there was consensus to do an informal F2F meeting of the TOC in the DockerCon June timeframe in Seattle. Solomon has graciously volunteered to help
Hello TOC Members,
As discussed on the call today, there was consensus to do an informal F2F meeting of the TOC in the DockerCon June timeframe in Seattle. Solomon has graciously volunteered to help
|
By
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
·
#217
·
|
|
Re: Mozilla Open Source Support (MOSS): Now Open To All Projects | The Mozilla Blog
It looks like a grant program?
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2015/12/10/mozilla-open-source-support-first-awards-made/
It looks like a grant program?
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2015/12/10/mozilla-open-source-support-first-awards-made/
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#216
·
|
|
Mozilla Open Source Support (MOSS): Now Open To All Projects | The Mozilla Blog
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2016/05/11/mozilla-open-source-support-moss-now-open-to-all-projects/
Just sayin
https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2016/05/11/mozilla-open-source-support-moss-now-open-to-all-projects/
Just sayin
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#215
·
|
|
apache foundation security
http://www.apache.org/security/
An example model for having foundation support for vulnerability management and mitigation
http://www.apache.org/security/
An example model for having foundation support for vulnerability management and mitigation
|
By
Camille Fournier
·
#214
·
|
|
Re: Slides for TOC Call: 5/11/16
In particular, note that I linked to some slides on the "how CNCF adds value to projects"
In particular, note that I linked to some slides on the "how CNCF adds value to projects"
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#213
·
|
|
Slides for TOC Call: 5/11/16
Here are the slides/agenda for today's call.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1olmQk5Xvp9xlLbVjNA3QP1mZU4p4yj_FAfUTFgr-9cA/edit?ts=572a21b3#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136
TOC Call- 5/11/16
8AM
Here are the slides/agenda for today's call.
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1olmQk5Xvp9xlLbVjNA3QP1mZU4p4yj_FAfUTFgr-9cA/edit?ts=572a21b3#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136
TOC Call- 5/11/16
8AM
|
By
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
·
#212
·
|
|
subscribe
By
Sengor Kusturica <sengork@...>
·
#211
·
|
|
Call tomorrow
I have a 7:30 presentation tomorrow morning (!) and can't make the call tomorrow, with my apologies!
- Bryan
I have a 7:30 presentation tomorrow morning (!) and can't make the call tomorrow, with my apologies!
- Bryan
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#210
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
+1
Thx,
e
From: Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>
Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM
To: Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
Cc: "cncf-toc@..."
+1
Thx,
e
From: Alexis Richardson via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...>
Reply-To: Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>
Date: Monday, May 9, 2016 at 1:02 PM
To: Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
Cc: "cncf-toc@..."
|
By
Elissa Murphy <elissam@...>
·
#209
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Matt,
Thanks.
We are still working on these things.
FWIW, I don't think it will be possible to presuppose a single duration. I would hope we can avoid the antipattern where a project get stuck in
Matt,
Thanks.
We are still working on these things.
FWIW, I don't think it will be possible to presuppose a single duration. I would hope we can avoid the antipattern where a project get stuck in
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#208
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
This is sensible as a safety mechanism. I appreciate the consideration.
Apologies if it has been defined elsewhere, but has a standard period/duration been prescribed for the incubation period, or is
This is sensible as a safety mechanism. I appreciate the consideration.
Apologies if it has been defined elsewhere, but has a standard period/duration been prescribed for the incubation period, or is
|
By
Matt T. Proud
·
#207
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
oh well in that case:
YES
now we are six.
oh well in that case:
YES
now we are six.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#206
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Just recapping the current vote for record keeping purposes.
Binding TOC votes:
+1 Ben Hindman: http://lists.cncf.io/pipermail/cncf-toc/2016-May/000196.html
+1 Ken Owens:
Just recapping the current vote for record keeping purposes.
Binding TOC votes:
+1 Ben Hindman: http://lists.cncf.io/pipermail/cncf-toc/2016-May/000196.html
+1 Ken Owens:
|
By
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
·
#205
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Sarah
Please could you summarise the votes to date.
a
Sarah
Please could you summarise the votes to date.
a
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#204
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
Hello TOC members,
Friendly reminder to vote on the “incubation principle” if you haven't already done so. We have 5 out of the 9 TOC votes.
+1 (non binding)
Best,
Sarah
Sarah Saul
Client
Hello TOC members,
Friendly reminder to vote on the “incubation principle” if you haven't already done so. We have 5 out of the 9 TOC votes.
+1 (non binding)
Best,
Sarah
Sarah Saul
Client
|
By
Sarah Saul <ssaul@...>
·
#203
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
YES
By
Brian Grant
·
#202
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
+1
By
Camille Fournier
·
#201
·
|
|
Re: VOTE "incubation principle"
+1
By
Jonathan Boulle <jonathan.boulle@...>
·
#200
·
|