cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1! -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

By Benjamin Hindman · #915 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

a +1 here is sufficient for now Justin if you support the WG creation, here are the concrete goals for the proposed serverless WG atm: Provide clarity for ourselves and consumers w.r.t. what this

By Chris Aniszczyk · #914 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

I agree this would be a useful group in the cncf but also have concerns discussed in earlier calls about being too early on trying to standardize a solution and possibly limit an evolving technology

By Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> · #913 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

As I mentioned on the call, IBM as a key participant in Open Whisk will be there. -Doug Sent from my iPhone

By Doug Davis <dug@...> · #912 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Hi Ken, Very interested! Please add me in. Thanks, Ying

By Ying Huang <Ying.Huang@...> · #911 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Kubeless will participate -sebastien https://github.com/bitnami/kubeless -- Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa Run your favorite apps in

By Sebastien Goasguen <sebgoa@...> · #910 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Ken Can you solicit some oss projects to get involved? Is that doable? Please let us know! A

By alexis richardson · #909 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 non-binding -- Jong Choi VP, NCSOFT jongchoi@... _____________________________

By Jong Choi · #908 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

thanks Ken, I'd like to participate as well for Google Cloud Function, with a particular interest for portable container environment, standard events, etc Cheers //A -- Antonio Gulli | Site Lead &&

By Antonio Gulli <gulli@...> · #907 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

Thanks Ken, Chiming in for Fission.io -- I'd like to participate too, and we're especially interested in function portability across different serverless platforms, and standardization around event

By Soam Vasani · #906 ·

Re: Serverless WG formation

I agree and will participate. As an aside, I consider our definition of "Cloud Native” being container-packaged, too limiting. - Lee

By Lee Calcote · #905 ·

Serverless WG formation

Today on the TOC call we discussed starting a Serverless workgroup and I agreed to chair said workgroup. There was no disagreement on the call but many TOC members were not present. Please respond

By Kenneth Owens (kenowens) <kenowens@...> · #904 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 non-binding -- +31 652134960 CEO www.implicit-explicit.com Co-Founder www.softwarecircus.io Marketing Chair www.cncf.io

By Mark Coleman <mark@...> · #903 ·

Re: Vitess follow up

Sugu Please see here for Jepsen and (f.ex) CockroachDB https://jepsen.io/analyses/cockroachdb-beta-20160829 alexis <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #901 ·

prior docs about vitess

The main doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p7gqlpQNJpZtsolHeX6vXR4NXXwGrCMsCz8rSi5jsBA/edit#heading=h.d6b07oufwoag The original presentation a few weeks

By alexis richardson · #900 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 non binding On 2017-05-15 13:08, Doug Davis via cncf-toc wrote: -- Randy AbernethyManaging PartnerRX-M, LLCrandy.abernethy@...o 415-800-2922c 415-624-6447

By Randy Abernethy · #902 ·

FYI: Agenda CNCF TOC Meeting: 5/16/2017

Here's the deck for today: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1SHfBDI3YeyCTJ3ZrGoc0S4EmfHsUVW2jMmXmcYQe96E/edit#slide=id.gd5ae4e962_2_136 Thanks. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

By Chris Aniszczyk · #899 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 (Non-binding) -- Duncan Johnston-Watt Founder & Chief Executive Officer Phone: +44 777 190 2653 | Skype: duncan_johnstonwatt Twitter: @duncanjw | LinkedIn:

By Duncan Johnston Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...> · #898 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 non-binding

By John Belamaric · #897 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNI project proposal (incubation)

+1 -Josh On May 15, 2017, at 2:08 PM, Doug Davis via cncf-toc <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

By Bernstein, Joshua <Joshua.Bernstein@...> · #896 ·

7081 - 7100 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms