Sure. Assuming a pod running in K8S has already mounted a Rook volume the main flow is: - writes to the volume (say /dev/rbd0) go through the kernel module and then out on the network - one of the

Please can you talk through the interaction flow for a local plus remote disk write on AWS, assuming the write is initiated by a process associated with a container cluster (eg k8s).

The most severe failure cases are ones that could lead to permanent data loss. There are a few, but first some background: - Volumes are backed by virtual storage pools. - Virtual pools are made up

What are the failure cases for this ? <Bassam.Tabbara@...> wrote:

+1 to Rob's initiative on the demo. Rob and Digital Rebar are doing a valuable job at Kubernetes community - it should be useful to share it across the whole CNCF community.

Alexis, Thanks! We joined the Storage WG and will work with Ben on CSI and future projects. The use case was running Rook Block storage on-top of ephemeral/instance storage on EC2 instances vs. using

Alexis, For InfrasKit specifically, I'm interested in where this fits or replaces Docker Machine. There seem to be elements of Docker Machine in the design. Rob Rob ____________________________ Rob

Bassam It would be good for Rook team to join Storage WG, if you haven't done so yet. QQ: you said that k8s use cases that run on EBS have high failover times & that you can improve this. I missed

Rob That would be interesting & could also be good material for the CNCF website / blog. a

+1 to Alexis and Rob. I'd really like to see a good breakdown comparison between Infrakit and digital rebar, bosh, cloudformation, fog,and others Alex Baretto

All, I'd be happy to present / demo Digital Rebar to provide another cloud native perspective on how to address hybrid infrastructure automation. I believe that would help provide a helpful

From today's CNCF TOC call, there was some discussion on how InfraKit compares to Terraform, BOSH and Digital Rebar. Thanks again to David for taking the time to present. Let's use this thread to have

Thanks David, Patrick et al., for Infrakit pres today! https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Lzy94UNzdSXkqZCvrwjkcChKpU8u2waDqGx_Sjy5eJ8/edit#slide=id.g22ccd21963_2_0 Per Bryan's Q re Terraform,

+1

prometheus' brother was epimetheus. epimetrics? prometrics?

So that makes at least two of us. Can I consider this the OK from CNCF? You have firm commitment from my side. Feel free to start whatever process on your side at any time. The only open question

I want this.

Dear all, is there any update from your side? I.e. is this something CNCF definitely wants and, if yes, how should we best proceed? From our side, there will be a technical hangout tonight @ 19:00

You should be set now Camille, sorry, we had a bit of a snafu with the public calendar today. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

I got a meeting invite cancellation what gives? That unblocked my work calendar so better resend or I'll have another meeting put in that spot