cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Topics Expanded Polls

Export Group Data

Between

and

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

Dan Please could you revert to the last known good version? Alexis

By alexis richardson · #1175 ·

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

I made the change at the last minute to deal with a spacing issue. I will revert it in the next version and restore CI/CD to the top layer. Apologies. -- Dan Kohn <mailto:dan@...> Executive Director,

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #1174 ·

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

The TOC will have to fix this, by going back to the 0.92 structure, which was correct. And rebuilding from there.

By alexis richardson · #1173 ·

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

That's very disappointing

By alexis richardson · #1172 ·

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

It looks like it changed pretty significantly between 0.9.5 and 0.9.6.

By Camille Fournier · #1171 ·

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

Woah. How did CICD get moved? Wtf Landscape 0.92 is authoritative. I'm afraid this new thing is not. Dan, Chris, any ideas?

By alexis richardson · #1170 ·

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

Would be good to add a section for service providers. Especially now, when we have the first batch of certified kubernetes service provides Pini -- Pini Reznik CTO T. +31 (0) 6 317 99 811 W.

By Pini Reznik · #1169 ·

Re: New version of Cloud Native Landscape

Can someone point me to the doc or remind me why we decided to put "CI/CD" into the "provisioning" layer? It's a bit of an odd duck there so we must've had a good reason for it. Thanks, C

By Camille Fournier · #1168 ·

Re: [VOTE] Envoy project proposal (incubation)

+1, non-binding. Dustin Kirkland VP of Product Canonical, Ltd. @dustinkirkland <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

By Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@...> · #1167 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

+1 -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere

By Benjamin Hindman · #1166 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

By Camille Fournier · #1165 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding) -- Naadir Jeewa Platform Lead The Scale Factory,

By Naadir Jeewa <naadir@...> · #1164 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

+1 Clint Kitson Technical Director {code} by Dell EMC CNCF Governing Board Member --- email: Clinton.Kitson@... mobile: "+1 424 645 4116" team: codeDellEMC.com twitter: "@clintkitson" github:

By Kitson, Clinton <Clinton.Kitson@...> · #1163 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding) -- http://blog.arungupta.me http://twitter.com/arungupta

By Arun Gupta · #1162 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding)

By Gary Brown · #1161 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

+1! (non-binding) <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

By Chris Wright · #1160 ·

Re: [VOTE] Jaeger project proposal (incubation)

By Brian Grant · #1159 ·

Re: [VOTE] Envoy project proposal (incubation)

+1 (non-binding) sounds like an interesting project!

By Erin Boyd · #1158 ·

Re: [VOTE] Envoy project proposal (incubation)

I'll close the vote early next week to give time for other TOC members to vote in and any other non-binding community votes. Thanks everyone for voting. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

By Chris Aniszczyk · #1157 ·

Re: [VOTE] Envoy project proposal (incubation)

and that's six votes

By alexis richardson · #1156 ·

6821 - 6840 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms