|
Re: Notary/TUF: marshalled and ready to activate
I think we’re good to go, with the caveat that the comparison matrices covering other update frameworks are still somewhat misleading and/or inaccurate (depending on your perspective), and should
I think we’re good to go, with the caveat that the comparison matrices covering other update frameworks are still somewhat misleading and/or inaccurate (depending on your perspective), and should
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1245
·
|
|
Re: Notary/TUF: marshalled and ready to activate
I am ready
By
Brian Grant
·
#1244
·
|
|
Re: TOC Principles pull request
Dan,
Thank-you. I think the TOC & community could probably get to voting soon. It would be even better if the broader CNCF was +1 too. Eg: GB, EUC, ...
Would it be possible for you and Todd (cc'd)
Dan,
Thank-you. I think the TOC & community could probably get to voting soon. It would be even better if the broader CNCF was +1 too. Eg: GB, EUC, ...
Would it be possible for you and Todd (cc'd)
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1243
·
|
|
Re: TOC Principles pull request
The pull request has been open for 5 days, but the original document that the wording is taken from was published months ago.
Alexis, I think it's appropriate for you to call for a vote on approving
The pull request has been open for 5 days, but the original document that the wording is taken from was published months ago.
Alexis, I think it's appropriate for you to call for a vote on approving
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#1242
·
|
|
Notary/TUF: marshalled and ready to activate
Hi all
I think we are ready to start soliciting votes for Notary. Please shout now if you disagree, especially if you have been a TOC Contributor carrying out DD.
There were questions about TUF.
My
Hi all
I think we are ready to start soliciting votes for Notary. Please shout now if you disagree, especially if you have been a TOC Contributor carrying out DD.
There were questions about TUF.
My
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1241
·
|
|
Re: TOC Principles pull request
GovOps? GitGov?
By
alexis richardson
·
#1240
·
|
|
Re: TOC Principles pull request
Thanks. LGTM. There don't appear to be any comments. I'm itching to click the merge button. :-)
Thanks. LGTM. There don't appear to be any comments. I'm itching to click the merge button. :-)
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1239
·
|
|
Re: CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
To be determined in the SWG meeting this week! ;-)
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
To be determined in the SWG meeting this week! ;-)
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
|
By
Benjamin Hindman
·
#1238
·
|
|
Re: my cncf contributor volunteer seems to have been missed
sorry about that, added, but I expect people to make a comment on the sheet moving forward
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kCko19aVmwbRMQdULJbGk4w2AxkjbBWuD6PUNzvQl7U/edit#gid=0
--
Chris
sorry about that, added, but I expect people to make a comment on the sheet moving forward
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1kCko19aVmwbRMQdULJbGk4w2AxkjbBWuD6PUNzvQl7U/edit#gid=0
--
Chris
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1237
·
|
|
Re: CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
Chris/Ben,
What do you include in “Cloud Native Storage Landscape” is it just Block & File (CSI scope) ?
Or include Object, Scale-out Databases, Etc. (which IMO are a more natural fit for
Chris/Ben,
What do you include in “Cloud Native Storage Landscape” is it just Block & File (CSI scope) ?
Or include Object, Scale-out Databases, Etc. (which IMO are a more natural fit for
|
By
Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...>
·
#1302
·
|
|
Re: my cncf contributor volunteer seems to have been missed
Ahh - so the finger pointing begins :)
Seriously, there was a big pile-on there, so not surprised that it got missed. Chris can you add me, pls?
Christopher
Ahh - so the finger pointing begins :)
Seriously, there was a big pile-on there, so not surprised that it got missed. Chris can you add me, pls?
Christopher
|
By
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...>
·
#1301
·
|
|
Re: my cncf contributor volunteer seems to have been missed
Thank’s Alexis,
There was a big pile-on there, so not surprised that it got missed. Chris, can you add me, pls
Christopher
Thank’s Alexis,
There was a big pile-on there, so not surprised that it got missed. Chris, can you add me, pls
Christopher
|
By
Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...>
·
#1236
·
|
|
Re: my cncf contributor volunteer seems to have been missed
Chris L
Thank-you for raising this.
I must gracefully step aside and gesture at my colleague, Chris A, who had volunteered to populate that list with the names from the email thread ;-)
a
Chris L
Thank-you for raising this.
I must gracefully step aside and gesture at my colleague, Chris A, who had volunteered to populate that list with the names from the email thread ;-)
a
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1235
·
|
|
Re: CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
A Landscape, explained by a white paper, would be Helpful!
A Landscape, explained by a white paper, would be Helpful!
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1234
·
|
|
CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
FYI for wider awareness
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benjamin Hindman <benh@...>
Date: Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:35 PM
Subject: CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
To: cncf-wg-storage
FYI for wider awareness
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Benjamin Hindman <benh@...>
Date: Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 1:35 PM
Subject: CNCF SWG Agenda for 9/20 8 AM PT
To: cncf-wg-storage
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1233
·
|
|
RFC: CNCF Serverless WG Whitepaper
I mentioned that I would share this work from the CNCF Serverless WG:
https://github.com/cncf/wg-serverless
Please take a look at it, it's a fairly detailed overview of the serverless landscape (still
I mentioned that I would share this work from the CNCF Serverless WG:
https://github.com/cncf/wg-serverless
Please take a look at it, it's a fairly detailed overview of the serverless landscape (still
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1232
·
|
|
Re: FYI: CNCF TOC Meeting 9/19/2017 Agenda
Regarding notary/TUF due diligence, there remain some significant and legitimate concerns about the accuracy of the comparison matrix in the slide deck (for examplethis set of comments). Some updates
Regarding notary/TUF due diligence, there remain some significant and legitimate concerns about the accuracy of the comparison matrix in the slide deck (for examplethis set of comments). Some updates
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1231
·
|
|
FYI: CNCF TOC Meeting 9/19/2017 Agenda
Just a heads up, the TOC is meeting tomorrow, here's the agenda:
https://goo.gl/8TaHRx
We will cover information about the TOC principles, TOC election schedule, notary due diligence, GB dev seats
Just a heads up, the TOC is meeting tomorrow, here's the agenda:
https://goo.gl/8TaHRx
We will cover information about the TOC principles, TOC election schedule, notary due diligence, GB dev seats
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1230
·
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Welcome. Great news!
By
alexis richardson
·
#1229
·
|
|
Re: Welcome Ihor: New CNCF Dev Advocate
Excited to officially have you onboard, Ihor!
--
Shawn Preissner
Integrated Marketing Manager
The Linux Foundation
Cell: +1 (919)257-9591
Web: cncf.io and cncf.io/events
Sign up for our
Excited to officially have you onboard, Ihor!
--
Shawn Preissner
Integrated Marketing Manager
The Linux Foundation
Cell: +1 (919)257-9591
Web: cncf.io and cncf.io/events
Sign up for our
|
By
Shawn Preissner <spreissner@...>
·
#1228
·
|