|
|
Graduation review for Fluentd
Hello TOC!,
Fluentd team have sent a PR with the required information for the graduation review of the project, would you please take a look at it and share some feedback ?
|
Hello TOC!,
Fluentd team have sent a PR with the required information for the graduation review of the project, would you please take a look at it and share some feedback ?
|
By
Eduardo Silva
·
#1388
·
|
|
Declined: CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
By
Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@...>
·
#1387
·
|
|
Accepted: CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
Description
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1386
·
|
|
Invitation: CNCF: Public TOC Meeting @ Thu Dec 7, 2017 12pm - 12:45pm (PST) (cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io)
more details »
CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
When
Thu Dec 7, 2017 12pm – 12:45pm Pacific Time
Where
Meeting Room 14, Level 4 ACC, 500 E Cesar Chavez St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
|
more details »
CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
When
Thu Dec 7, 2017 12pm – 12:45pm Pacific Time
Where
Meeting Room 14, Level 4 ACC, 500 E Cesar Chavez St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
|
By
afisher@...
·
#1385
·
|
|
Canceled event: CNCF: Public TOC Meeting @ Thu Dec 7, 2017 2pm - 2:45pm (CST) (cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io)
This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar.
CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
When
Thu Dec 7, 2017 2pm – 2:45pm Central Time
Where
Meeting Room 14, Level 4 ACC, 500 E Cesar Chavez St,
|
This event has been canceled and removed from your calendar.
CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
When
Thu Dec 7, 2017 2pm – 2:45pm Central Time
Where
Meeting Room 14, Level 4 ACC, 500 E Cesar Chavez St,
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1384
·
|
|
Invitation: CNCF: Public TOC Meeting @ Thu Dec 7, 2017 12pm - 12:45pm (PST) (cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io)
more details »
CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
When
Thu Dec 7, 2017 12pm – 12:45pm Pacific Time
Where
Meeting Room 14, Level 4 ACC, 500 E Cesar Chavez St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
|
more details »
CNCF: Public TOC Meeting
When
Thu Dec 7, 2017 12pm – 12:45pm Pacific Time
Where
Meeting Room 14, Level 4 ACC, 500 E Cesar Chavez St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
|
By
afisher@...
·
#1383
·
|
|
Re: [RESULT] TOC Principles v1.0 APPROVED
Thank you!
By
alexis richardson
·
#1382
·
|
|
[RESULT] TOC Principles v1.0 APPROVED
Hey all, just letting you know the TOC Principles have been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/PRINCIPLES.md
+1 binding TOC votes from:
Alexis:
|
Hey all, just letting you know the TOC Principles have been approved:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/PRINCIPLES.md
+1 binding TOC votes from:
Alexis:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1381
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF TOC Principles
+1
By
alexis richardson
·
#1380
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF TOC Principles
+1 non-binding
By
Erin Boyd
·
#1379
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF TOC Principles
+1 (And sorry for the delay!)
- Bryan
|
+1 (And sorry for the delay!)
- Bryan
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#1378
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF TOC Principles
+1
By
Camille Fournier
·
#1377
·
|
|
Call to Action: Project Proposal Due Diligence
Hey CNCF TOC and wider community, we currently have 4 project proposals in flight:
Istio: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/70
Rook: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57
SPIFFE:
|
Hey CNCF TOC and wider community, we currently have 4 project proposals in flight:
Istio: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/70
Rook: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57
SPIFFE:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1376
·
|
|
Re: landscape, spiffe, opa, vault
anyone else want to chip in?
|
anyone else want to chip in?
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1375
·
|
|
Re: landscape, spiffe, opa, vault
I've been reading it this morning. I think SPIFFE/SPIRE, OPA, and Vault fit nicely within that framing. Frankly, I think proxies fit within the AAA category, too.
Maybe we're even talking about "AAA"
|
I've been reading it this morning. I think SPIFFE/SPIRE, OPA, and Vault fit nicely within that framing. Frankly, I think proxies fit within the AAA category, too.
Maybe we're even talking about "AAA"
|
By
Sunil James <sunil@...>
·
#1374
·
|
|
Re: landscape, spiffe, opa, vault
I am ok with that. Wonder what others think?
Is that an offer? ;-)
a
|
I am ok with that. Wonder what others think?
Is that an offer? ;-)
a
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1373
·
|
|
Re: landscape, spiffe, opa, vault
Tough one, but I'd say "yes."
FWIW, we should probably read through RFC 2989 (specifically the agreed-upon terminology) for historical context.
---
SJ | sunil@... | Scytale & SPIFFE
|
Tough one, but I'd say "yes."
FWIW, we should probably read through RFC 2989 (specifically the agreed-upon terminology) for historical context.
---
SJ | sunil@... | Scytale & SPIFFE
|
By
Sunil James <sunil@...>
·
#1372
·
|
|
Re: landscape, spiffe, opa, vault
would you suggest moving key management to AAA?
|
would you suggest moving key management to AAA?
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1371
·
|
|
Re: landscape, spiffe, opa, vault
+1 to this framing, particularly to its cross-cutting nature. While I agree 'security' is a natural starting bucket, the value propositions these (and other) projects address go beyond this (over
|
+1 to this framing, particularly to its cross-cutting nature. While I agree 'security' is a natural starting bucket, the value propositions these (and other) projects address go beyond this (over
|
By
Sunil James <sunil@...>
·
#1370
·
|
|
Re: landscape, spiffe, opa, vault
+1 to the Authentication (SPIFFE, spire), Authorization (OPA), Audit (?). Classically these are part of Security, but there's no box for that.
AAA is typically cross-cutting. OPA, for example, has
|
+1 to the Authentication (SPIFFE, spire), Authorization (OPA), Audit (?). Classically these are part of Security, but there's no box for that.
AAA is typically cross-cutting. OPA, for example, has
|
By
Tim Hinrichs
·
#1369
·
|
