|
Re: RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence
Hi Chris,
Can we create a timeline for the DD starting with this one?
Thanks,
Erin
Hi Chris,
Can we create a timeline for the DD starting with this one?
Thanks,
Erin
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#1459
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
Non-binding +1
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM
To: "cncf-toc@..."
Non-binding +1
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Reply-To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>
Date: Thursday, January 18, 2018 at 12:08 PM
To: "cncf-toc@..."
|
By
Grigoriu, Marius <marius.grigoriu@...>
·
#1458
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
+1 binding
By
Jonathan Boulle <jon@...>
·
#1457
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
Non-binding +1
By
Joseph Jacks <jacks.joe@...>
·
#1456
·
|
|
RFC: NATS project proposal due diligence
The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/81
It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any
The NATS community has posted their project proposal on GitHub:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/81
It would be great if the TOC and wider community would perform any due diligence and make any
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1455
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
+1 non binding
By
Brandon DuRette
·
#1454
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
+1 non-binding for me
Best Regards,
Shannon Williams
shannon@...
+1 650-521-6902
+1 non-binding for me
Best Regards,
Shannon Williams
shannon@...
+1 650-521-6902
|
By
Shannon Williams <shannon@...>
·
#1453
·
|
|
[VOTE] rook project proposal (inception)
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.
Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage
The TOC has decided to invite rook (https://github.com/rook/rook) as an INCEPTION level CNCF project, sponsored by Ben Hindman from the TOC.
Rook is an open source orchestrator for distributed storage
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1452
·
|
|
FYI: TOC Project Voting Queue
At the TOC meeting earlier this week, the TOC has decided to invite 4 projects for voting after a lengthy community due diligence period:
rook: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57
vitess:
At the TOC meeting earlier this week, the TOC has decided to invite 4 projects for voting after a lengthy community due diligence period:
rook: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57
vitess:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#1451
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
+1 non-binding for me, with +1 to Brian Grant on process
+1 non-binding for me, with +1 to Brian Grant on process
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#1450
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
+1 from me, as well, but we need to talk about the desired process going forward
+1 from me, as well, but we need to talk about the desired process going forward
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1449
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
Apologies, my vote is binding.
Apologies, my vote is binding.
|
By
Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
·
#1448
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
+1 non-binding.
By
Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
·
#1447
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
Here is my
+1
Vote
By
alexis richardson
·
#1446
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
Contributor diversity is not an explicit criterion at the incubation stage:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/graduation_criteria.adoc
Contributor diversity is not an explicit criterion at the incubation stage:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/graduation_criteria.adoc
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#1445
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
+1 to keeping it - non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 |
+1 to keeping it - non-binding
thanks
-Doug
_______________________________________________________
STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology
(919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 |
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1444
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors.
I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors.
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#1443
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted?
Best
Duncan
--
Duncan Johnston-Watt
Founder & Chair, Advisory Board
Phone: +44
I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted?
Best
Duncan
--
Duncan Johnston-Watt
Founder & Chair, Advisory Board
Phone: +44
|
By
Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...>
·
#1442
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project.
- brandon
I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project.
- brandon
|
By
brandon@...
·
#1441
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] linkerd inception project review 2018
FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances.
-William
FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances.
-William
|
By
William Morgan
·
#1440
·
|