I prefer the engineered attributes: Operable Observable Elastic Resilient AgileOver the end goals: Scalable Durable Continuous Since I think some indication of strategy/technique is needed in order

Great discussion. Thanks! Do you mind if we incorporate some/all of them? ChrisA also pointed out that Schedule A at the bottom of the charter also needs to be similarly updated. My current thinking

+1 non binding

+1 (non-binding) -- Michael Fertik michael@... DISCLAIMER Any private opportunity discussed in this email or its attachments is being presented to you because you have expressed an interest in such

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding Andrew Randall Tigera

0 non-binding I think the spec is very interesting and necessary but I feel like it, and associated example tooling (SPIRE), may be too early for even inception level -- Justin

+1 binding

+1 (non-binding) Alan Fraser CREDIT SUISSE Information Technology | Core Eng - Engineering Solutions - NY, VIAD 32

-1 binding. I would rather see this mature for a while.

+1 (non-binding) Ramkumar Kb Lead Engineer, APAC-PB-IT Channels +65 6212 8403 (*650 8403) ============================================================================== Please access the

I’m +1 only the spec. -1 anything else. On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 17:34 Thangavelu, Kapil via Lists.Cncf.Io <kapil.thangavelu=capitalone.com@...> wrote: -- Jessie Frazelle 4096R / D4C4 DD60 0D66 F65A

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non binding)

+1 binding.

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non-binding)

+1 non-binding