+1 (non binding) -- w o r k — b e n c h Vipin Chamakkala Principal vipin@... + 1 347 943 8129 @V1P1N 110 Fifth Avenue, Fifth Floor New York, New York 10011 work-bench.com

+1 (non-binding)

Since the moment is opening up for debate, I will make a stand (again) that we should require cross-org maintainership. I believe this might help with some of Jesse Frazelle's commentary recently as

With my apologies, I am in Korea this week and won't be able to attend -- though if I find myself awake at that hour, I reserve the right to dial in. ;) - Bryan

Erin Please could you be specific? Do you think Inception and/or Incubation should require Maintainers from more companies? I am not promising changes, but *now* is the time to table and debate

Camille, I agree, indeed we may wish to be more definitive even

The way that Apache separates out its "incubator" projects from full projects is that incubation projects are not listed in the main list of Apache projects, but rather on the incubator.apache.org

Hi Alexis, It's not a question, but just an observation of voiced 'concern' I see on many of the inception level requests, where the feedback is "where is the community support beyond company A",

Erin Thank you. What is your question about community support? Alexis

Alexis/Dan et all, I appreciate the work it is to grow this foundation and ensure it lands in a healthy place, it's no small feat! With the popularity of CNCF, it's 'endorsement' to projects is a huge

Yes, platinum members are the ones backing CNCF at the highest level. Our membership fees: https://www.cncf.io/about/join/ Nope, there's no such contract. However, this is intended to be a one-slide

Can I have Camille's second vote? +1 binding <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Can I have Camille's second vote? +1 binding <caniszczyk@...> wrote:

Hey everyone, I'm happy to announce that Vitess has been accepted into CNCF as an INCUBATION level project (sponsored by Brian Grant): https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/57 +1 TOC binding votes (8 /

Jess That's really one for Dan but AIUI the whole website is in the process of being nurtured into an optimal state for 2018 .... So all comments good & timely, anywhere. a

Quick question: what are the platinum members, the ones who paid the 300k? Do they need to be on the same slide / materials as the projects? Is that written into a contract or something? Also I'm

thanks Dan & team @all TOC community, please do comment to Dan directly or on tomorrow's TOC call

We'll be discussing maturity levels on the TOC call. This is just a quick note that at the TOC's request, we revised CNCF marketing materials to clearly separate Incubating and Inception

Draft slides https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1jRS8QTalE6ct-yShLS9h3d6qDRQj16YjS04No9b3-XE/edit?ts=5a783a4d#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0

I agree that it's an end goal. I also agree that it's vague and not specific to cloud-native approaches. Even the principle of least privilege dates back to at least the 70s, so I don't think it's