Apologies, my vote is binding.

+1 non-binding.

Here is my +1 Vote

Contributor diversity is not an explicit criterion at the incubation stage: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/graduation_criteria.adoc

+1 to keeping it - non-binding thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 |

I think the biggest concern is that Buoyant continues to dominate development given that other companies are generally making small patches rather than becoming major contributors.

I don't have a binding vote either but I am curious given linkerd's impressive stats why it isn't being promoted? Best Duncan -- Duncan Johnston-Watt Founder & Chair, Advisory Board Phone: +44

I don't have a vote, but I'd love to see linkerd remain a CNCF project. - brandon

FWIW that article is not 100% correct. Linkerd ships with a control plane (Namerd). This is how these companies are controlling routing policy across Linkerd instances. -William

Yes, this is simply "let's keep this project going" decision. It's in two steps because I'd like to queue up multiple projects to be reviewed to graduate/move to the next level in one TOC call. I'd

"Why are we doing this in 2 steps? This is just a "yes, we want to keep the project" decision?" agreed, Chris, what's your thinking here? <briangrant=google.com@...> wrote:

In general, I'd like to link to devstats dashboards in these types of reviews, so we can see the trajectory. For

Different projects make different design tradeoffs. Also, these 2 projects aren't directly comparable. This article explains the difference pretty

CNCF allows for competing projects, see our TOC principles for more information on this: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/PRINCIPLES.md#no-kingmakers--one-size-does-not-fit-all Istio currently

Hi Chris, Personally, I would like to get clarification of competing component: linkerd vs istio. I learnt for example one company I met in KubeCon converting from linkerd to

Hey TOC and community, we are requesting a vote to keep linkerd (https://github.com/linkerd/linkerd) as an inception project for another year based on their presentation yesterday. Here are some stats

Good idea

Chris, Dan, To Brian's comment - "I think there's an opportunity for help from TOC contributors with these types of reviews, to pre-review the information provided, ask questions about project health

The application specifically addressed the graduation criteria, which was helpful. I posted some links to some stats relating to project health and contributor diversity. The incubation criteria also

First off, happy 2018! Second, here's the deck for tomorrow: https://goo.gl/5wBe3d We plan to cover the existing project proposals + deciding on calling for a vote for the ones that have received