+1 non binding -- Christian Posta twitter: @christianposta http://blog.christianposta.com

+1 non-binding

+1 binding

+1 Binding

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Monday, 26 February 2018 at 16:52 To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Kubernetes

​+1 non-binding​ -- Justin Garrison justingarrison.com

Chris I think the right way to reflect our governance values is in the Graduation criteria and Incubation criteria. Therefore the Sandbox doc could add a statement of the form "The CNCF will help

+1 non-binding

+1 Regards, -Andy From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of John Belamaric <jbelamaric@...> Date: Monday, February 26, 2018 at 8:59 AM To: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...> Cc: "cncf-toc@..."

+1 non-binding

Thanks for your feedback here Stephen, a big tenant of CNCF has always been that projects are self governing and can bring their own governance as long as it's transparent + fair (we call this minimum

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding).

+1 non-binding.

+1 non-binding thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Open Source, Cloud Architecture & Technology (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm

+1 binding

+1 binding