+1 binding We (both the CNCF and Kubernetes) definitely need something like this. We can iterate on the details.

+1 binding -- Benjamin Hindman Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos Mesosphere Inc. Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere Follow Us

+1, binding As a co-author of this doc I want to endorse the direction as strongly as possible. If you feel you may want to vote -1, please do so, but ideally so that we can improve the doc. Keep

What do you not like about the name, and what other name would you prefer?

+1 (non-binding) -- Sebastien Goasguen Senior Director of Cloud Technologies, Bitnami +41 79 367 38 25 @sebgoa

+1 binding

+1 non binding

+1 non-binding

Same.

+1 non-biding on the spirit, -1 non-binding on the naming. Best, Ruben

There’s been a desire within the CNCF TOC and community to provide further clarity around project maturity levels in CNCF and this has resulted into the CNCF Sandbox proposal after a month of

+1 non-binding Best Regards, Shannon Williams shannon@... +1 650-521-6902

+1 non-binding Best Regards, Von Gosling(@vongosling), ASF RocketMQ Co-Founder, Linux OpenMessaging Initiator

I added a comment to this nature, the final version of the sandbox guidelines are here: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/92 I will call a formal vote tomorrow barring any major issues. -- Chris

+1 non-binding <caniszczyk@...> wrote: -- Alban Crequy Kinvolk GmbH | Adalbertstr. 6a, 10999 Berlin Geschäftsführer/Directors: Alban Crequy, Chris Kühl, Iago López

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding) -- http://blog.arungupta.me http://twitter.com/arungupta

+1 non-binding

+1 non-binding. -Mark -- Mark Interrante SVP Infrastructure Engineering | Salesforce m: 415-638-1268 e: minterrante@... t: @interrante l: in/interrante -- -