I don't find the term "serverless" to be useful. It's too broad, and could encompass purely client-based computations and web hosting as well as FaaS. I see Functions as a Service as an instance of

Two weeks ago, we at Container Solutions, had an internal hackaton around serverless. Tried most of the tools listed by you Ryan. We are going to publish some blog posts about our findings later

Hi, I have been lurking on this list for sometime now. Skippbox which I founded was recently acquired by Bitnami (a recent member of CNCF). At Kubecon thursday I introduced kubeless[1] which

[inlined] <anthony@...> wrote: Agreement on these terms is probably a bit much to expect. For some time I was hoping we'd settle on "Jeff". While I'm not a lawyer, Lambda seems like the

+1

Thanks for kicking this off Ryan. To provide a little more context for the rest of the TOC, I worked on the first ServerlessConf with Peter Sbarski (in CC) and Alexis asked if it would be possible to

We would like to see a separate group working on serverless as well. At Galactic Fog we have had a serverless implementation on DCOS for about 6 months, and we plan to release our Kubernetes native

Hello all, If haven't heard Amazon&others raising a general ruckus about serverless lately, I sincerely hope your vacation to the backwoods was relaxing. 😁 I'm Ryan, and I've been interested in

Congratulations to the rkt team :)

Great news, congratulations containerd!

Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that rkt (https://github.com/coreos/rkt) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/33 binding +1 TOC votes (8/9): -

Hey everyone, I'm thrilled to announce that containerd (http://containerd.io/) has been accepted as a CNCF incubation level project: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/32 binding +1 TOC votes (8/9): -

+1

+1 Very excited to see this come together.

+1

+1

Aha. Hold that thought please!

My schedule has shifted slightly, so 0800PT Tuesday would work for me.

We got stuck on times of day. Tuesday was the leading candidate, with PT 0800, 0830, 0900 as leading slots. <cncf-toc@...> wrote:

Were we planning to change the meeting day? What happened to that?