cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Clint That's promising. What do the CSI people think? BTW, the name "REX-Ray" seems designed to direct the layperson's attention as far as possible from the stated purpose of the project. Might a

By alexis richardson · #1815 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

Alexis, I asked the same question ahead of time and got a positive response. https://github.com/rexray/rexray/issues/1167 Clint Kitson Technical Director for {code} CNCF Governing Board Member ---

By Kitson, Clinton <clinton.kitson@...> · #1814 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

> It almost like saying there is OpenTracing, OpenTracing-Packaging-and-Tools, and Jaeger as three separate projects. #2 is actually https://github.com/opentracing-contrib/, that contains

By Yuri Shkuro · #1813 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

If rexray and CSI benefit from "co evolution" then that might make sense. Is that the case? What does the community think?

By alexis richardson · #1812 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

Thanks Dan, I think having spec and implementation(s) in the same foundation make sense. In this case, Rex-Ray is not an implementation. If I understood it correctly, its a a set of tools, packaging,

By Bassam Tabbara · #1811 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

CNCF has three precedents of separate specs and implementations: + CNI and the CNI plugins (most prominently Calico, Flannel and Weave Net, none of which are yet CNCF projects) + OpenTracing and

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #1810 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

I see where you’re coming from Clint, but in this case I agree with Bassam. To follow on to what he said, I’m very concerned that this would become yet another place where the interface to storage

By Mueller, Garrett <Garrett.Mueller@...> · #1809 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

By mueller@... · #1808 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 binding.

By Sam Lambert <samlambert@...> · #1807 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31eff88140_0_37 The best place to start here is to refer to the slide above. CSI by its name is an

By Kitson, Clinton <clinton.kitson@...> · #1806 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 (non-binding)

By Daniel Bryant · #1805 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding -- +31 652134960 CEO www.implicit-explicit.com Co-Founder www.softwarecircus.io Marketing Chair www.cncf.io

By Mark Coleman <mark@...> · #1804 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

I think Clint should chime in here, but I had seen RexRay as more than just a CSI implementation... as a multi platform storage orchestrator? Maybe some clarification on what that means could help,

By Gou Rao <grao@...> · #1803 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

Yes please do chime in!

By alexis richardson · #1802 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

Yes I think so. But really I am a storage idiot. Who else could we ask?

By alexis richardson · #1801 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

I’m glad to see the strong alignment between Rex-Ray and CSI. Would it make sense for Rex-Ray to be even more closely aligned with CSI, i.e. as a set of libraries and tools for people wanting to

By Bassam Tabbara · #1800 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

'sandbox' has the connotation of 1) the island of broken toys and 2) incomplete, disposable, non-serious ideas or projects My 2c

By Ruben Orduz <ruben@...> · #1799 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding

By Yong Tang <ytang@...> · #1798 ·

Re: RexRay follow up

All - questions? (thanks Clint, this is super helpful) <clinton.kitson@...> wrote:

By alexis richardson · #1797 ·

Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal

+1 non-binding

By Christopher LILJENSTOLPE <cdl@...> · #1796 ·

6181 - 6200 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms