|
Re: Vitess follow up
Once you're an official CNCF project, most of these benefits are included so it's not an issue :)
The next step would be to finalize the TOC sponsor (Brian), potentially sketch out a proposal (you can
Once you're an official CNCF project, most of these benefits are included so it's not an issue :)
The next step would be to finalize the TOC sponsor (Brian), potentially sketch out a proposal (you can
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#850
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
That's a great list.
Chris, what are your thoughts?
That's a great list.
Chris, what are your thoughts?
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#849
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
Hi Alexis,
Here are areas where we'd love to get help for Vitess:
- Help with marketing & PR. This is one area we're severely lacking.
- Advocacy through the ambassador program.
- Take over funding
Hi Alexis,
Here are areas where we'd love to get help for Vitess:
- Help with marketing & PR. This is one area we're severely lacking.
- Advocacy through the ambassador program.
- Take over funding
|
By
Sugu Sougoumarane
·
#848
·
|
|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Yes that's exactly right. What Fedora/RHEL did for the early Linux movement, we are hoping to do for the container movement with Moby/Docker.That is exactly what we are encouraging. Moby is designed
Yes that's exactly right. What Fedora/RHEL did for the early Linux movement, we are hoping to do for the container movement with Moby/Docker.That is exactly what we are encouraging. Moby is designed
|
By
Solomon Hykes
·
#847
·
|
|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Solomon,
Seems like there is interest to learn about Moby beyond the TOC
Saw your TheCUBE interview and Moby does make sense, sort of the Linux and RedHat/Fedora model if I got it right
The
Solomon,
Seems like there is interest to learn about Moby beyond the TOC
Saw your TheCUBE interview and Moby does make sense, sort of the Linux and RedHat/Fedora model if I got it right
The
|
By
Yaron Haviv
·
#846
·
|
|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Sounds good, let's get this on agenda for May, probably first call on May 3
Sounds good, let's get this on agenda for May, probably first call on May 3
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#845
·
|
|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
That would be helpful.
--
--Swarna.
That would be helpful.
--
--Swarna.
|
By
Swarna Podila <swarna@...>
·
#844
·
|
|
Re: Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
+1 for CNCF community at large.
Best
--
Duncan Johnston-Watt
CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
+44 777 190 2653 | @duncanjw
Sent from my iPhone
+1 for CNCF community at large.
Best
--
Duncan Johnston-Watt
CEO | Cloudsoft Corporation
+44 777 190 2653 | @duncanjw
Sent from my iPhone
|
By
Duncan Johnston-Watt <duncan.johnstonwatt@...>
·
#843
·
|
|
Q&A on Moby Project & CNCF?
Hi all, this week Docker launched an important new project: the Moby project (http://mobyproject.org). Moby will allow Docker to better collaborate with the ecosystem in general, and the CNCF in
Hi all, this week Docker launched an important new project: the Moby project (http://mobyproject.org). Moby will allow Docker to better collaborate with the ecosystem in general, and the CNCF in
|
By
Solomon Hykes
·
#842
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
Sugu
Thank-you. Those are good reasons! Are there specific places where
you'd like help winning or keeping more contributors?
Look forward to your view on systems & tradeoffs. Can I humbly
Sugu
Thank-you. Those are good reasons! Are there specific places where
you'd like help winning or keeping more contributors?
Look forward to your view on systems & tradeoffs. Can I humbly
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#841
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
Hi Chris, Alexis,
For the license, we already intend to change it to ALv2: https://github.com/youtube/vitess/issues/2694.
For the comparison of various systems and trade-offs, we'll try to put
Hi Chris, Alexis,
For the license, we already intend to change it to ALv2: https://github.com/youtube/vitess/issues/2694.
For the comparison of various systems and trade-offs, we'll try to put
|
By
Sugu Sougoumarane
·
#840
·
|
|
Re: Vitess follow up
Also in terms of process, I believe Brian Grant on today's call has expressed interest in sponsoring the project from the TOC. I'd suggest at a following or next TOC meeting to decide whether the TOC
Also in terms of process, I believe Brian Grant on today's call has expressed interest in sponsoring the project from the TOC. I'd suggest at a following or next TOC meeting to decide whether the TOC
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#839
·
|
|
Vitess follow up
Sugu
Thank you again for your pres today.
What would *help Vitess the most* from a project advancement & end user POV? How can CNCF help?
a
Sugu
Thank you again for your pres today.
What would *help Vitess the most* from a project advancement & end user POV? How can CNCF help?
a
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#838
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
mmm I need to double check into the thread. Let's keep this out. I will confirm next meeting :)
2017-04-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>:
--
Gianluca Arbezzano
www.gianarb.it
mmm I need to double check into the thread. Let's keep this out. I will confirm next meeting :)
2017-04-19 16:55 GMT+02:00 Alexis Richardson <alexis@...>:
--
Gianluca Arbezzano
www.gianarb.it
|
By
Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@...>
·
#837
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
Gianluca, has Camille reviewed this?
Gianluca, has Camille reviewed this?
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#836
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
I am happy to share something about this proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16sCYq5EcB9_NFmnjtQ6WYmQ6tmt6CxYzsDL2ibrqPK8/edit#heading=h.lecnlkp0qpeq
I shared it via wg-ci some week ago, in
I am happy to share something about this proposal:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/16sCYq5EcB9_NFmnjtQ6WYmQ6tmt6CxYzsDL2ibrqPK8/edit#heading=h.lecnlkp0qpeq
I shared it via wg-ci some week ago, in
|
By
Gianluca Arbezzano <gianarb92@...>
·
#835
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
With my apologies for the late notice, I'm unable to make the call this morning due to a meeting that I can't move; talk to you in two weeks.
- Bryan
With my apologies for the late notice, I'm unable to make the call this morning due to a meeting that I can't move; talk to you in two weeks.
- Bryan
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#834
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
The doc hasn't really been touched in a while so we might have all the reviews/comments we're going to get. I did a little bit of clean-up around the "What should a CNCF WG do in this space?" section
The doc hasn't really been touched in a while so we might have all the reviews/comments we're going to get. I did a little bit of clean-up around the "What should a CNCF WG do in this space?" section
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#833
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
thanks Mark! can you be sure to remind me & chris to get this discussed in the next TOC in 2-3 weeks?
feel free to add reminder to today's TOC deck
thanks Mark! can you be sure to remind me & chris to get this discussed in the next TOC in 2-3 weeks?
feel free to add reminder to today's TOC deck
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#832
·
|
|
Re: Agenda for TOC 4/19/17 Meeting
Given dockercon might take away availability and attention I’d be fine with moving further serverless discussion out to the next meeting. Perhaps a reminder to review/comment on the notes
Given dockercon might take away availability and attention I’d be fine with moving further serverless discussion out to the next meeting. Perhaps a reminder to review/comment on the notes
|
By
Mark Peek
·
#831
·
|