|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs.
We could "make governance docs great
As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it!
Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs.
We could "make governance docs great
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1683
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
As a dog owner, I object to that.
As a dog owner, I object to that.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1682
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to
Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to
|
By
Doug Davis <dug@...>
·
#1681
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Hurrah
By
alexis richardson
·
#1680
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers,
I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers,
|
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#1679
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
Please note that as of 0945 UK time on 8 Feb 2018, voting is paused.
<yangguan=google.com@...> wrote:
Please note that as of 0945 UK time on 8 Feb 2018, voting is paused.
<yangguan=google.com@...> wrote:
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1678
·
|
|
[VOTE] [PAUSE] INCEPTION
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the
Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about
market perception & confusion. It is most likely that
Hi all
In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the
Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about
market perception & confusion. It is most likely that
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1677
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Yang Guan
·
#1676
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Egor Guz <egor.guz@...>
·
#1675
·
|
|
Re: Incubating and Inception levels in marketing materials
Erin
Let's sort out inception/sandbox and then we'll see. For the record,
I think "community support" is not an objective metric.
alexis
Erin
Let's sort out inception/sandbox and then we'll see. For the record,
I think "community support" is not an objective metric.
alexis
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1674
·
|
|
Re: Incubating and Inception levels in marketing materials
Alexis,
I guess it depends on what we plan to do with inception in terms of acceptance, dd, marketing, etc..
I absolutely think it's imperative that we have community support at incubation.
The
Alexis,
I guess it depends on what we plan to do with inception in terms of acceptance, dd, marketing, etc..
I absolutely think it's imperative that we have community support at incubation.
The
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#1673
·
|
|
Re: Incubating and Inception levels in marketing materials
Alex
Thanks for your patience in this. Showing a mature and objective face to users is so important and I know you have been overwhelmed and doggedly doing the right thing.
In terms of handling
Alex
Thanks for your patience in this. Showing a mature and objective face to users is so important and I know you have been overwhelmed and doggedly doing the right thing.
In terms of handling
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1672
·
|
|
Re: Incubating and Inception levels in marketing materials
Following up on this thread and the discussion on the TOC call yesterday, I'd like to see better clarity overall in the marketing of how inception and incubation projects are differentiated.
The
Following up on this thread and the discussion on the TOC call yesterday, I'd like to see better clarity overall in the marketing of how inception and incubation projects are differentiated.
The
|
By
Alex Chircop
·
#1671
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
Quinton Hoole
Technical Vice President
America Research Center
2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050
Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office #
+1 (non-binding)
Quinton Hoole
Technical Vice President
America Research Center
2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050
Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office #
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1670
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 non-binding
--
- Aabhas
+1 non-binding
--
- Aabhas
|
By
Aabhas Sharma <aabhas@...>
·
#1669
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
--
Christian Posta
twitter: @christianposta
http://blog.christianposta.com
+1 (non-binding)
--
Christian Posta
twitter: @christianposta
http://blog.christianposta.com
|
By
Christian Posta
·
#1668
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 non-binding
By
Ben Schmoker
·
#1667
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SPIFFE project proposal (inception)
+1 (non-binding)
By
Daniel Bryant
·
#1666
·
|
|
Re: Incubating and Inception levels in marketing materials
Luis
The CNCF does and should endorse cross-org maintainership. It has to
be realistic though. Many projects have a very healthy lifecycle with
just one group backing them, even when that group
Luis
The CNCF does and should endorse cross-org maintainership. It has to
be realistic though. Many projects have a very healthy lifecycle with
just one group backing them, even when that group
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1665
·
|
|
Re: Incubating and Inception levels in marketing materials
Bob
Thanks for this.
There is a consistent theme that we heard at the F2F in Austin and
again since, that was addressed on the last TOC call and obviously
needs more discussion.
Consider this
Bob
Thanks for this.
There is a consistent theme that we heard at the F2F in Austin and
again since, that was addressed on the last TOC call and obviously
needs more discussion.
Consider this
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1664
·
|