As a dog owner (see my sig), I love it! Imagine all of the other easter eggs we could put in our docs. We could "make governance docs great

As a dog owner, I object to that.

Can we get the phrase "cat poop" added to the formal CNCF definition of Sandbox? That would make our governance docs much more interesting to

Hurrah

I'm sorry to have missed the call this week, but I think the term "Sandbox" is great -- in addition to its positive connotations of fun and play, it's also dirty and filled with sniffling toddlers,

Please note that as of 0945 UK time on 8 Feb 2018, voting is paused. <yangguan=google.com@...> wrote:

Hi all In this week's TOC we converged on some possible changes to the Inception tier, that can address issues that have been raised about market perception & confusion. It is most likely that

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non-binding)

Erin Let's sort out inception/sandbox and then we'll see. For the record, I think "community support" is not an objective metric. alexis

Alexis, I guess it depends on what we plan to do with inception in terms of acceptance, dd, marketing, etc.. I absolutely think it's imperative that we have community support at incubation. The

Alex Thanks for your patience in this. Showing a mature and objective face to users is so important and I know you have been overwhelmed and doggedly doing the right thing. In terms of handling

Following up on this thread and the discussion on the TOC call yesterday, I'd like to see better clarity overall in the marketing of how inception and incubation projects are differentiated. The

+1 (non-binding) Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell: 408-320-8917 Office #

+1 non-binding -- - Aabhas

+1 (non-binding) -- Christian Posta twitter: @christianposta http://blog.christianposta.com

+1 non-binding

+1 (non-binding)

Luis The CNCF does and should endorse cross-org maintainership. It has to be realistic though. Many projects have a very healthy lifecycle with just one group backing them, even when that group

Bob Thanks for this. There is a consistent theme that we heard at the F2F in Austin and again since, that was addressed on the last TOC call and obviously needs more discussion. Consider this