|
Re: [RESULT] Cloud Native Definition: APPROVED
And here is some initial marketing material with the new definition: https://twitter.com/dankohn1/status/1006218781268631552
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation
And here is some initial marketing material with the new definition: https://twitter.com/dankohn1/status/1006218781268631552
--
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#2120
·
|
|
[RESULT] Cloud Native Definition: APPROVED
The TOC has approved the updated cloud native definition with input from the community: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/117
+1 TOC binding votes (6 / 9):
Quinton Hoole:
The TOC has approved the updated cloud native definition with input from the community: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/117
+1 TOC binding votes (6 / 9):
Quinton Hoole:
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2119
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Cloud Native Definition
+1 (non-binding)
By
Sijie Guo
·
#2118
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Cloud Native Definition
+1 binding
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
+1 binding
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
|
By
Benjamin Hindman
·
#2117
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Cloud Native Definition
+1 binding.
Lots of work went into this. Thank you everyone.
+1 binding.
Lots of work went into this. Thank you everyone.
|
By
Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
·
#2116
·
|
|
Re: Feedback on Cortex presentation + call for TOC sponsors
Thank you, everyone, for taking the time today to consider sponsoring Cortex as a CNCF sandbox project.
After listening to the discussions today, I have a couple of points to make while you are
Thank you, everyone, for taking the time today to consider sponsoring Cortex as a CNCF sandbox project.
After listening to the discussions today, I have a couple of points to make while you are
|
By
Bob Cotton <bob@...>
·
#2115
·
|
|
Feedback on Cortex presentation + call for TOC sponsors
Hello
First off: thanks for hosting our presentation today!
This is a follow up email as per Chris' suggestion, there were some questions on the chat we didn't get a chance to answer. Also, if anyone
Hello
First off: thanks for hosting our presentation today!
This is a follow up email as per Chris' suggestion, there were some questions on the chat we didn't get a chance to answer. Also, if anyone
|
By
Tom Wilkie <tom.wilkie@...>
·
#2114
·
|
|
[RESULT] Helm project ACCEPTED (incubation)
Hey everyone, we are happy to announce that the Helm project has been accepted into CNCF as a INCUBATION level project sponsored by Brian Grant: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/114
+1 TOC binding
Hey everyone, we are happy to announce that the Helm project has been accepted into CNCF as a INCUBATION level project sponsored by Brian Grant: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/114
+1 TOC binding
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2113
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1 binding
- Bryan
By
Bryan Cantrill <bryan@...>
·
#2112
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 06:59
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Helm project proposal
+1 binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, May 29, 2018 at 06:59
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Helm project proposal
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#2111
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1 binding
Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> schrieb am Di., 29. Mai 2018, 15:59:
+1 binding
Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> schrieb am Di., 29. Mai 2018, 15:59:
|
By
Jonathan Boulle <jon@...>
·
#2110
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding
On 5/31/2018 12:13 PM, Sam Lambert wrote:
--
Nick Chase, Head of Technical and Marketing Content, Mirantis
Editor in Chief, Open Cloud
+1 non-binding
On 5/31/2018 12:13 PM, Sam Lambert wrote:
--
Nick Chase, Head of Technical and Marketing Content, Mirantis
Editor in Chief, Open Cloud
|
By
Nick Chase
·
#2109
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1 binding
By
Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
·
#2108
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
Specifically, this:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/114#issuecomment-393029368
Specifically, this:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/114#issuecomment-393029368
|
By
Brian Grant
·
#2107
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1
Curtis Yanko
Director of Strategy and Global Alliances
301.684.8080 x205 (W) 860.729.8321 (M)
LinkedIn | Twitter | DevSecOps In The Enterprise - Flipboard
p.s., Watch this 3-minute video
+1
Curtis Yanko
Director of Strategy and Global Alliances
301.684.8080 x205 (W) 860.729.8321 (M)
LinkedIn | Twitter | DevSecOps In The Enterprise - Flipboard
p.s., Watch this 3-minute video
|
By
Curtis Yanko
·
#2106
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
Alexis and Dan,
I think this is a great point that could use some clear clarification. There is a need for a place that enables cross vendor collaboration on projects that target Kubernetes as a
Alexis and Dan,
I think this is a great point that could use some clear clarification. There is a need for a place that enables cross vendor collaboration on projects that target Kubernetes as a
|
By
Matt Farina
·
#2105
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
Thank you. I’ll check it out.
Dan Barker
Chief Architect
National Association of Insurance Commissioners
1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64106
816-783-8669
Thank you. I’ll check it out.
Dan Barker
Chief Architect
National Association of Insurance Commissioners
1100 Walnut St. Suite 1500
Kansas City, MO 64106
816-783-8669
|
By
Barker, Daniel <drbarker@...>
·
#2104
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
Dan
These are great questions. There is some additional discussion in the GitHub issue for Helm.
A
Dan
These are great questions. There is some additional discussion in the GitHub issue for Helm.
A
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#2103
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1 non-binding, however I’m concerned about the precedent being set of including k8s-only tools. I think this precedent was already set with Telepresence or Rook. The TOC requires a specification to
+1 non-binding, however I’m concerned about the precedent being set of including k8s-only tools. I think this precedent was already set with Telepresence or Rook. The TOC requires a specification to
|
By
Barker, Daniel <drbarker@...>
·
#2102
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Helm project proposal (incubation)
+1
By
chris@...
·
#2101
·
|