|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
Aah – to be clear I was not pointing fingers at anyone in particular :-). Just advocating for unambiguous communication, even to those who may not have English as a first language.
Q
From: Alexis
Aah – to be clear I was not pointing fingers at anyone in particular :-). Just advocating for unambiguous communication, even to those who may not have English as a first language.
Q
From: Alexis
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1825
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
Yes, please!
Also, you just called Chris British ;-)
Yes, please!
Also, you just called Chris British ;-)
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1824
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
I think the proposal skirts around the due diligence issue a bit too much. I think we need to be more direct and a little less British about it, perhaps :). I’ll add some specific comments in the
I think the proposal skirts around the due diligence issue a bit too much. I think we need to be more direct and a little less British about it, perhaps :). I’ll add some specific comments in the
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1823
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
Quinton
Thank-you. Do you think the Sandbox write-up is sufficiently clear on
that point? (I think it is, but keen to get this right).
Ruben, all,
We are intentionally lowering the bar so I am
Quinton
Thank-you. Do you think the Sandbox write-up is sufficiently clear on
that point? (I think it is, but keen to get this right).
Ruben, all,
We are intentionally lowering the bar so I am
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1822
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
While I share some of the concerns about the name sandbox (and no, I don’t have any better proposals :-), when considering alternatives like “launchpad” and “runway" I think that we need to be
While I share some of the concerns about the name sandbox (and no, I don’t have any better proposals :-), when considering alternatives like “launchpad” and “runway" I think that we need to be
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#1821
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
Garrett,
Forgive me, I am not quite sure I follow. What is your recommendation for rexray in the context of your description below?
A
Garrett,
Forgive me, I am not quite sure I follow. What is your recommendation for rexray in the context of your description below?
A
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1820
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
If I’m taking your meaning correctly, co-evolution (where there are two independent projects that rely on each other) is precisely the situation I was arguing against.
If we do this right, I think
If I’m taking your meaning correctly, co-evolution (where there are two independent projects that rely on each other) is precisely the situation I was arguing against.
If we do this right, I think
|
By
Mueller, Garrett <Garrett.Mueller@...>
·
#1819
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
FWIW, two ideas I've fiddled with recently: Launchpad or Runway
FWIW, two ideas I've fiddled with recently: Launchpad or Runway
|
By
Ruben Orduz <ruben@...>
·
#1818
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
Thank-you Richard, appreciate the thought that you and others have put into it.
Thank-you Richard, appreciate the thought that you and others have put into it.
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1817
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
I think it's a good direction to take.
As per the discussion in the doc, the name has connotations which are
contrary to the intended meaning. That being said, I couldn't come up
with a better name;
I think it's a good direction to take.
As per the discussion in the doc, the name has connotations which are
contrary to the intended meaning. That being said, I couldn't come up
with a better name;
|
By
Richard Hartmann
·
#1816
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
Clint
That's promising. What do the CSI people think?
BTW, the name "REX-Ray" seems designed to direct the layperson's
attention as far as possible from the stated purpose of the project.
Might a
Clint
That's promising. What do the CSI people think?
BTW, the name "REX-Ray" seems designed to direct the layperson's
attention as far as possible from the stated purpose of the project.
Might a
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1815
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
Alexis,
I asked the same question ahead of time and got a positive response.
https://github.com/rexray/rexray/issues/1167
Clint Kitson
Technical Director for {code}
CNCF Governing Board Member
---
Alexis,
I asked the same question ahead of time and got a positive response.
https://github.com/rexray/rexray/issues/1167
Clint Kitson
Technical Director for {code}
CNCF Governing Board Member
---
|
By
Kitson, Clinton <clinton.kitson@...>
·
#1814
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
> It almost like saying there is OpenTracing, OpenTracing-Packaging-and-Tools, and Jaeger as three separate projects.
#2 is actually https://github.com/opentracing-contrib/, that contains
> It almost like saying there is OpenTracing, OpenTracing-Packaging-and-Tools, and Jaeger as three separate projects.
#2 is actually https://github.com/opentracing-contrib/, that contains
|
By
Yuri Shkuro
·
#1813
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
If rexray and CSI benefit from "co evolution" then that might make sense. Is that the case? What does the community think?
If rexray and CSI benefit from "co evolution" then that might make sense. Is that the case? What does the community think?
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#1812
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
Thanks Dan, I think having spec and implementation(s) in the same foundation make sense.
In this case, Rex-Ray is not an implementation. If I understood it correctly, its a a set of tools, packaging,
Thanks Dan, I think having spec and implementation(s) in the same foundation make sense.
In this case, Rex-Ray is not an implementation. If I understood it correctly, its a a set of tools, packaging,
|
By
Bassam Tabbara
·
#1811
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
CNCF has three precedents of separate specs and implementations:
+ CNI and the CNI plugins (most prominently Calico, Flannel and Weave Net, none of which are yet CNCF projects)
+ OpenTracing and
CNCF has three precedents of separate specs and implementations:
+ CNI and the CNI plugins (most prominently Calico, Flannel and Weave Net, none of which are yet CNCF projects)
+ OpenTracing and
|
By
Dan Kohn <dan@...>
·
#1810
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
I see where you’re coming from Clint, but in this case I agree with Bassam. To follow on to what he said, I’m very concerned that this would become yet another place where the interface to storage
I see where you’re coming from Clint, but in this case I agree with Bassam. To follow on to what he said, I’m very concerned that this would become yet another place where the interface to storage
|
By
Mueller, Garrett <Garrett.Mueller@...>
·
#1809
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
I see where you’re coming from Clint, but in this case I agree with Bassam. To follow on to what he said, I’m very concerned that this would become yet another place where the interface to storage
I see where you’re coming from Clint, but in this case I agree with Bassam. To follow on to what he said, I’m very concerned that this would become yet another place where the interface to storage
|
By
mueller@...
·
#1808
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Sandbox proposal
+1 binding.
By
Sam Lambert <samlambert@...>
·
#1807
·
|
|
Re: RexRay follow up
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31eff88140_0_37
The best place to start here is to refer to the slide above. CSI by its name is an
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1BthkP9OftIICEn1h9ML1F0TKXhaUxXILlcDpuz3Sjzg/edit#slide=id.g31eff88140_0_37
The best place to start here is to refer to the slide above. CSI by its name is an
|
By
Kitson, Clinton <clinton.kitson@...>
·
#1806
·
|