The Go question came up in the call, which is interesting as much of the CNCF ecosystem is currently Go based, although diversifying. Go is unusual in not supporting async interfaces really,

How much interoperability testing have you done? Especially in the multi hop multi implementation cases

+stevegury@... Hi, Here’s answers to your questions below. Please reach out to Ben Hale, Steve Gury, or myself if you have additional questions Thanks, Robert Roeser Rsocket team,

The proposal looks good. I’m fully in support. Q Quinton Hoole Technical Vice President America Research Center 2330 Central Expressway, Santa Clara, CA 95050 Tel: 408-330-4721 Cell:

Just a heads up, the etcd community published their incubation project proposal: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/143 I'd like to invite the TOC and wider community to review it for a week or so

+1 (non-binding)

+1 (non-binding) -Kai From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 7:56 AM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Prometheus

Has it not actively sought contributors or users up to now? The project hasn’t sought active contributors until now. What did the "language agnostic" point mean? RSocket is spec’d protocol

Great presentation, RSocket is an interesting project - the flow control handling with the lease based model is impressive. Speaking for myself and the NATS team, we’re happy to see more messaging

Thanks for the presentation. It looks like the project has existed for about 3 years? Has it not actively sought contributors or users up to now? Development looks not very active and it has < 300

Colin, your feedback is essential, please do share Rsocket team, key questions for me are: - what are main differences/USPs Vs prior art (nats, grpc, 0mq) - is rsocket more of a lib or a "product' -

https://github.com/rsocket I just wanted to move this discussion to the mailing list as there was some questions that weren't answered and I know that Colin had some feedback on the project

+1 binding

+1 non-binding

Hey all, we are meeting tomorrow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1Eebd5ZwSYyvNRLbHDpiF_USDC4sEz7lEEpPLju_0PaU/edit#slide=id.g25ca91f87f_0_0 We will be hearing a readout from the GB strategy

+1 binding -- NORMAL --

+1 non-binding Thanks & Best Regards, 徐翔轩 ---------------------------------------------------- 上海得帆信息技术有限公司 SHANGHAI DEFINESYS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO.,

+1 non-binding 郑淮城 星环信息科技（上海）有限公司 15216615728 徐汇区虹漕路88号越虹广场B座11-12楼 发件人: <cncf-toc@...> 代表 "Eichten, Daniel"

+1 non-binding Von: cncf-toc@... <cncf-toc@...> im Auftrag von Pengfei Ni <feiskyer@...> Gesendet: Sonntag, 5. August 2018 14:39:50 An: Chris Aniszczyk Cc: CNCF TOC Betreff: Re: [cncf-toc] [VOTE]

+1 (non-binding) Best regards. --- Pengfei Ni 2018-04-17 22:56 GMT+08:00 Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>: