|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (binding)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 06:50
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SAFE (Security)
+1 (binding)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Tuesday, September 4, 2018 at 06:50
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] SAFE (Security)
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#2380
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding).
Using Rook in production at CENGN, it has been highly useful to us.
Raymond Maika
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer
CENGN - Centre of Excellence in Next Generation Networks
555
+1 (non-binding).
Using Rook in production at CENGN, it has been highly useful to us.
Raymond Maika
Cloud Infrastructure Engineer
CENGN - Centre of Excellence in Next Generation Networks
555
|
By
Raymond Maika <raymond.maika@...>
·
#2379
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
Chris Short
Web | Newsletter | Twitter
+1 non-binding
Chris Short
Web | Newsletter | Twitter
|
By
Chris Short
·
#2378
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (binding)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 08:19
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Rook moving to
+1 (binding)
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 08:19
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Rook moving to
|
By
Quinton Hoole
·
#2377
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Jeff Billimek
·
#2376
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 binding
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
+1 binding
--
Benjamin Hindman
Founder of Mesosphere and Co-Creator of Apache Mesos
Mesosphere Inc.
Follow us on Twitter: @mesosphere
Follow Us
|
By
Benjamin Hindman
·
#2375
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 8:19 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Rook moving to
+1 non-binding
From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...>
Date: Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 8:19 AM
To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...>
Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Rook moving to
|
By
Wilson, Dan <dan.wilson01@...>
·
#2374
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
JJ
·
#2373
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
By
Yassine Tijani <ytijani@...>
·
#2372
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
Ken Owens
·
#2371
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 non-binding
--
Bob Killen
Research Cloud Administrator
University of Michigan
+1 non-binding
--
Bob Killen
Research Cloud Administrator
University of Michigan
|
By
Bob Killen <rkillen@...>
·
#2370
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thomas Phelan
Chief Architect
650 533 6462Try BlueData on AWS: www.bluedata.com/AWS
+1 (non-binding)
--
Thomas Phelan
Chief Architect
650 533 6462Try BlueData on AWS: www.bluedata.com/AWS
|
By
Tom Phelan
·
#2369
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 binding
By
alexis richardson
·
#2368
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non binding)
By
Steve Kokhang Leon
·
#2367
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding)
By
Alex Chircop
·
#2366
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
Very big (non-binding) +1 !
Very big (non-binding) +1 !
|
By
Joseph Jacks <j@...>
·
#2365
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
+1 (non-binding).
By
Ihor Dvoretskyi
·
#2364
·
|
|
[VOTE] Rook moving to incubation
Rook (https://rook.io) has requested to move to the incubation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/139
In the time since being accepted to the sandbox, two releases were completed,
Rook (https://rook.io) has requested to move to the incubation maturity level:
https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/139
In the time since being accepted to the sandbox, two releases were completed,
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#2363
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] SAFE (Security) Working Group
+1 (non-binding)
By
Ylinen, Mikko
·
#2362
·
|
|
Re: RFC: Dragonfly
Hi, Randy,
Thanks for your feedback.
We are very sure that all these adopters of Dragonfly are using Dragonfly in production like what I mentioned in my presentation.
Since Dragonfly is very
Hi, Randy,
Thanks for your feedback.
We are very sure that all these adopters of Dragonfly are using Dragonfly in production like what I mentioned in my presentation.
Since Dragonfly is very
|
By
AllenSun
·
#2361
·
|