cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

I second Matt's and Alexis' point on having more of local mini-conferences/camps. Even for those in the US or Europe, there isn't always a chance to travel to a major city, and hotel prices as well

By Ilya Dmitrichenko · #2535 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

I really like the checkbox (or slider) suggestion - I think it could be very helpful all around. I've helped review some submissions, and I try to apply consistent criteria. I based my criteria on

By justinsb@... · #2534 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Firstly I am more than happy with the conference tracks, I always learn a huge amount and take away a lot more for study. A few thoughts from discussing this thread with organisers of other major

By Andrew Martin · #2533 · Edited

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

+1000 As much as I like to contribute via reviewing, I certainly don’t envy the chairs and no matter how rude certain people on this thread are or think it’s OK to use whatever tone they feel

By Michael Hausenblas <mhausenb@...> · #2532 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

As an organiser of various conferences (and as someone who didn't get a talk accepted at KubeCon this year), can I just point out that Liz and Janet have done a fantastic job in orchestrating

By Daniel Bryant · #2531 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Liz, I appreciate you’re taking time here with more details. I want to note a difference between malicious intent and people drawing conclusions of it. Those are different people in different

By Matt Farina · #2530 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Nick, In my experience, airtime at a major conference is a huge factor in developer growth for a project. Of the several projects I’ve started personally (heat, magnum, kolla), we saw 3x core

By Steven Dake · #2529 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

just for stats, for the ServerlessNYC event in 2 weeks (1 day we organized) we got about 50 submission, only 2 on Knative (one accepted) also while most submissions covered real user stories based on

By Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...> · #2528 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Liz, i assume you know how things work, a company doesn't need to make all the submission it self to push an agenda your role is to provide diversity, not just in speakers but also in topics, its just

By Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...> · #2527 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

I'm going to say that I agree with you here, but I'm going to play devil's advocate for just a moment. Let's say that JaneSchmoeNativeTool IS better than GNativeTool. Even if Jane

By Nick Chase · #2526 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

For the sake of my point let's remove "Google" altogether and replace with "HugeVendor" not to be pointing fingers since they are doing what any vendor would do in their position of

By Ruben Orduz <ruben@...> · #2525 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Only four of the submissions on Knative were from Google! Perhaps it goes to show that a lot of other people are also interested in this technology? Again I go back to my point that a lot of people

By Liz Rice · #2524 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

I'm aware this is a bit a political minefield here, but I'm concerned the committee(s) are unintentionally choosing winners here (same for KubeCon EU Købnhavn). What I mean is this: "popularity" of a

By Ruben Orduz <ruben@...> · #2523 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

liz, its not the number of submission which should count, i guess if "theoretically" there was a large company w special interest in Knative they can make hundred submission to promote it. We saw the

By Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...> · #2522 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Eughhh, reading this through I fear it might come over as defensive, but since I've collected the information, I'm going ahead regardless. Let's look at the *actual* situation on this serverless

By Liz Rice · #2521 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Liz, thanks for sharing those details. I know this is a tough job. Thanks for putting up with this extra work of the questioning and people poking at the ideas here. Anything I’m suggesting is more

By Matt Farina · #2520 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Matt, thank you for your thoughtful response. I like your list and your focus on identifying solutions for things that need to be improved. Yaron, by my very quick reckoning in a rather complicated

By Liz Rice · #2519 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

Dan, looking at the schedule, the fact that out of total 6 sessions in the Serverless track there are4 talks about Knative raises a serious question about the bias of this process how come the

By Yaron Haviv <yaronh@...> · #2518 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

On Tue, Oct 9, 2018 at 11:14 AM Matt Farina <matt@...> wrote: if TLF is there for the benefit of it’s members than shouldn’t most feel they are on a level playing field in this 501c6? If TLF is

By Dan Kohn <dan@...> · #2517 ·

Re: Thoughts on KubeCon

If we don’t have problems we’re trying to solve or things we’re trying to improve, how can we review the proposed solutions against the issues? Wouldn’t it be easy to start having color of the

By Matt Farina · #2516 ·

5461 - 5480 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms