There was a lot of discussion regarding the sandbox (especially with the k8s incubator dissolving https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/95#issuecomment-376940995) but the idea is that there was a need

FYI: at Fluent Bit project (part of Fluentd) we started using IssueHunt I/O mostly to get more help on issues.-- Eduardo Silva Open Source, Treasure Data http://www.treasuredata.com/opensource

This is a great idea Ben Overall a strong theme going into the GB off-site was "the TOC community wants more feedback from end users please". The GB and exec staff said that was heard and

I've read this thread (and its predecessor) with interest and there have been so many great suggestions. One quick thing that would add some value and might (?) not be that hard... I actively

Excellent point Jesse and Ruben – this is something I know I’d love to see the TOC bring to the Governing Board before our next meeting in Shanghai, Chris. Best Regards, Shannon

+1. Bug bounties, pay for regular third party security audits, pay to have a white hat on staff doing security work on behalf of projects full time, etc. Yes. For certain types of projects such as

Sandbox is a great model that enforces collaboration and cloud native ecosystem growth. But it feels that the main CNCF goal of "fostering a community around a constellation of high-quality projects"

Cannot +1 this enough. There are folks out there donating their time/sweat to projects who have to rely on pittance/donations/freelance work. This foundation has more than enough means to provide a

A FAQ of practical knowledge to share between projects. A mentor program to help people who have to lead projects that are part of the CNCF. It’s different to lead an open source project on your own

Bounties on bug fixes comes to mind. -- Jessie Frazelle 4096R / D4C4 DD60 0D66 F65A 8EFC 511E 18F3 685C 0022 BFF3 pgp.mit.edu

Pay the maintainers and high contributors who don't have other means to make money. -- Jessie Frazelle 4096R / D4C4 DD60 0D66 F65A 8EFC 511E 18F3 685C 0022 BFF3 pgp.mit.edu

Matt I kicked off a new thread on the "helping projects" topic you & Jessie have homed in on. Re: "favourites" I think this ought to be simple: 1) Graduated & Incubated projects get lots of help &

If you have ideas on how we can help projects more, please give us ideas here or take a look at the servicedesk where we document the services CNCF offers for projects:

Jessie & Matt Thank-you for raising and elaborating on the topic of how CNCF helps projects. The topic was aired (again) at the last GB offsite, whose slides were shared a couple of months ago.

Hey all, one of the feedback items from the last CNCF Maintainer Survey was improved documentation for the service desk used by CNCF projects: https://github.com/cncf/servicedesk We have recently

Beyond neutral IP, I agree this is the most important thing the foundation provides, and IMHO CNCF does not do enough of it (there are so many things that high velocity projects need I could go on and

Yeah that was what I meant with shared IP. I think there are ways to limit the effect of gamification of the system and I think you all have done a great job of this so far especially with the format

In addition to what Jess said, a foundation provides a vendor neutral (or as close as we can get) location for a project. Competitors on products and services have a place to work together on projects

+1 Agreed and well put. From:<cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Jessica Frazelle via Lists.Cncf.Io" <me=jessfraz.com@...> Reply-To: "me@..." <me@...> Date: Tuesday, September 18, 2018 at 5:31 PM To:

Really excited to see this news. It's a trend to embrace the CNCF ecosystem (k8s, docker) currently, and we are trying to build our own platform based on k8s. In image distribution part, Dragonly is