+1 non-binding

+1 binding.

+1 binding

Perfect! Thanks Justin. Q From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Justin Garrison <justinleegarrison@...> Date: Thursday, November 8, 2018 at 13:46 To: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> Cc: Chris Short

Thanks Quinton for the suggestion. I added some of my feedback here. https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/163#issuecomment-437167354 -- Justin Garrison justingarrison.com

Any and all constructive feedback on project proposals from the community is definitely encouraged. Justin, may I suggest that you add your specific questions or concerns to the PR at

I'm interested in hearing more before I vote.

I genuinely appreciate Justin's feedback on these votes. If I'm not intimately familiar with the project/product I often wait for Justin's input prior to voting. I wholeheartedly encourage Justin's

+1 nb

I'm well aware of the adoption and uses of Harbor. My company runs it and my criticisms come from first hand experience as a user and operator of the software. I'm happy to move my feedback out of

The solution here provenly isn't a time limit but a more rigorous sandbox review process. If it looks apparent that a project will incubate quickly (has the backing of a known member and/or is a

+1 NB -Doug cncf-toc@... wrote on 11/07/2018 01:06:21 AM: > From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk > <caniszczyk@...> > Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 3:27 PM > To: CNCF TOC

I'm not sure I see why a minimum period of time is necessary. There's a set of criteria that a project need to meet in order to cross into Incubation; if it meets those criteria quickly then why

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Chris Aniszczyk <caniszczyk@...> Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2018 at 3:27 PM To: CNCF TOC <cncf-toc@...> Subject: [cncf-toc] [VOTE] Harbor moving to

If Sandbox is for early-stage projects I find hard that after 3 months is not longer in that stage (maybe that term needs to be corrected?) . If a project joined Sandbox and after 3 months is ready

+1 nb

+1 non-binding. -- Anjana Fernando Director WSO2 Inc. | http://wso2.com lean . enterprise . middleware

I don't think it's a loophole. It appears to be by design. The Sandbox guidelines (https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/process/sandbox.md) clearly state that one of the goals of Sandbox is to:

Yes, that’s how I read Eduardo’s question as well - one of ensuring a loophole doesn’t exist. - Lee Sent from my mobile

I think Eduardo's point is that it looks like getting to incubation through sandbox is easier than just entering directly via incubation. I don't think that should be the case.