cncf-toc@lists.cncf.io

Home Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Messages

Between

and

Yes, although I think that operators themselves will probably also be discussed in most of the SIG’s, as they’re a general-purpose automation mechanism, and may be applied anywhere. So

By Quinton Hoole · #2857 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Quinton et al, Would it be acceptable to add"Operators" to list of areas covered in the App Dev, Ops & Testing - "Area" column? As we get asked a lot which Kubernetes SIG this topic falls into. I know

By Diane Mueller · #2856 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Agreed that this should likely be left up to the chartering process, but Oversight to me says “management”. So something like a steering committee or advisory board, not necessary related to

By Sonya Koptyev <sonya@...> · #2855 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

For what it’s worth, I poked around in some dictionaries and thesauri, and am now even more convinced that you’re all right and Governance is not the best term. Succinct alternatives seem fairly

By Quinton Hoole · #2854 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

I fully expect some of the SIG names to be wordsmithed by the TOC Liaison, Chairs and other interested parties of that SIG during the chartering process, where the more detailed scope of the SIG will

By Quinton Hoole · #2853 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

"Security and Compliance" is a good name. I would not limit it just to "Security". Rapidly evolving cloud environments do require governance, and there is a broad range of policies that need to be

By Igor Mameshin · #2852 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

+1 to Security & Compliance over Governance (Which will get abbreviated to SecComp and then everyone will think there’s a SIG on seccomp profiles. :)

By Michael Ducy · #2851 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Sure - regulations are what folks have to be in compliance with. So long as the SIG doesn't start writing more regulations :-) -- Liz Rice @lizrice | lizrice.com | +44 (0) 780 126 1145

By Liz Rice · #2850 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

RegSec?

By alexis richardson · #2849 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

+1 that "Governance" isn't a great name for this security-related SIG. I'd suggest "Security and Compliance". In many cases end users are concerned not just with security but also with associated

By Liz Rice · #2848 ·

FYI: Summer of Code 2019 + CNCF

CNCF plans on participating in Summer of Code again this year: https://github.com/cncf/soc#project-ideas If you're a CNCF project/mentor interested in participating, please submit a project idea with

By Chris Aniszczyk · #2847 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

I agree with Sarah, and this is where most people missunderstand policy - they think of it in terms of governance instead of a set of rules which provides constraints for a cluster. Could we change it

By Zhipeng Huang · #2846 ·

Re: Thank-yous (was Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF SIGs Proposal)

+1.

By Brian Grant · #2845 ·

Thank-yous (was Re: [cncf-toc] CNCF SIGs Proposal)

Quinton has done all the "final" edits, and the team of volunteers (Erin, Matt, Alex & some others) got the doc into an editable state. THANK-YOU! a

By alexis richardson · #2844 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Overall the doc looks great -- thanks Alexis for your editorial work and Quinton for moving this forward! One small point on naming of a specific SIG: Governance security, authentication,

By Sarah Allen <sarahallen@...> · #2843 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

From: Brian Grant <briangrant@...> Date: Friday, February 1, 2019 at 07:24 To: Quinton Hoole <quinton.hoole@...> Cc: "cncf-toc@..." <cncf-toc@...>, Erin Boyd <eboyd@...>, Sarah Allen

By Quinton Hoole · #2842 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Maybe we can put the doc into GitHub and capture comments in there. Geri - we had commenting turn on before and we had hundreds of comments so it was intended to provide a cleaner view of the document

By Erin Boyd · #2841 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Erin (and Quinton), Yes, Quinton's edits and clarification are spot on - and much appreciated! Many thanks! Diane -- Kind Regards, Diane Mueller Director, Community Development Red Hat

By Diane Mueller · #2840 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Thanks for all the work on this. It's much improved. I think the proposed governance model should address concerns with earlier proposals. What is meant by "high level roadmap of projects within this

By Brian Grant · #2839 ·

Re: CNCF SIGs Proposal

Is there a way to have the ability to add comments and notes directly in the doc? In read-only mode, it is hard to provide much detailed feedback. Thanks, Geri Jennings CyberArk From:

By Geri Jennings · #2838 ·

5141 - 5160 of 7995

Home Hashtags Subgroups Terms