Thanks Phil, always nice to see a project evolve its governance after community feedback. Here's the PR for reference: https://github.com/containerd/project/pull/16-- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |

Because it came up during the graduation comment period for containerd, and specifically on this TOC email list, I wanted to close the loop and note that today by agreement of at least a 2/3rds

Dan, You are correct. I was able to open it up in my personal computer! Thanks Mehmet

You can get access if you open them in an incognito window. -- Dan Kohn <dan@...> Executive Director, Cloud Native Computing Foundation https://www.cncf.io +1-415-233-1000 https://www.dankohn.com

The slides are public, please don't spam the main list. This is a verizon setting, your employer is blocking you from accessing the deck for some insane reason. -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |

Below is what I get when I click on the url. You need permission Want in? Ask for access, or switch to an account with permission. Learn more You are signed in as mehmet.toy@.... Request

Here's the deck for

I'll volunteer, unless Quinton wants it 🙂

no but I look forward for someone from the TOC to volunteer, feel free to comment on the PR

Thanks Chris Has anyone been assigned yet to lead the technical due diligence? Thanks Q

Thanks, Chris! That channel just got archived on slack, unfortunately. We are in #cluster-api as well, though. we can set up a mailing list for metalkube too if that helps. Russell Bryant --

> "So I'm curious to see who is interested in Kubernetes on bare metal? " If the TOC is interested in Kube on bare metal... there's also KRIB on Digital Rebar which uses KubeAdm and has a wide range

That's great Xuan! I agree, Kube is very promising for a variety of edge and other usecases in the network. Jump on #wg-onprem in Kubernetes Slack, visit http://metalkube.org/, or ping Russell (Cc'd)

Hi Chris, i am very interested in this project. It may have some value in edge computing. We are finding if community have any solution to solve the bare metal machine management problem . MetalKube

Just an FYI, OPA! They are close to their 1 year anniversary for their annual review as a sandbox project and also want to request a move to incubation: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/199 We look

So do we (Scality) as a way to deploy our products on customer premises, including K8s 'as an implementation detail' (but of course reaping the benefits of doing so). I submitted a proposal for a

I agree, I'm very disappointed by that statement. Indeed. Similarly all solutions have security challenges. And then pointing to microvms as interesting after describing Kata as FUD is minimally

The statement about competing with openstack is especially unfortunate. And all solutions have noisy neighbor challenges. It's workload dependent.

sure I’ll slot a bit of time

Chris, can we put this on the agenda for the next TOC meeting please. I'd like the TOC to have a clear understanding of what's happening with the Cloud-native Network Functions effort, as it's very