Thanks Liz for pointing out my use of 'thought leadership' is not really what I intended. I just wanted to share with the TOC that many projects/people/companies do look to the CNCF as the

"Thought leadership" in the sense of innovation - this fundamentally has to come from across the community. The TOC, with support and input from the new SIGs, is curating, not inventing. I doubt

Hi Erin, I have heard similar requests from multiple companies, so thanks for raising this. I agree that clarity would benefit the different communities involved. I suggest the SIGs seek input from

A solution is discussed on Github, let's move discussion there: https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/213 -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) | +1-512-961-6719

Can we potentially keep the conversation about this in one place? https://github.com/cncf/toc/issues/213 It looks like what is emerging there is it's fine to directly use MITRE for now and the CNCF

Erin: Indeed. Security has been the archetype for CNCF SIGs. We'd love to have you join the SAFE WG where we bring together implementors, platform creators and practitioners. We meet 11am PT on

Hey Erin, I think a lot of us bristle at the term “thought leadership”. One of the principles of the TOC is that we are not kingmakers –

Hey TOC- A requirement of graduation to CNCF is following the CII Criteria. And one of the requirements is having CVE numbers in release notes. Unfortunately, two weeks ago the DWF system designed for

Hi Joe, Thanks for your insight. Yes, I agree our job as part of this community is fostering projects where they are in the process and diversifying the landscape. But it is as equally important to

Cheryl, wdyt?

Hi All, I had a call with some executives looking to understand the CNCF's role better in the industry in terms of what I could gather as 'thought leadership.' They are looking to the CNCF to provide

btw, I heard back from Torrin, and he filed the following issues with further details on the concerns I raised: https://github.com/open-policy-agent/opa/issues/1274 (issues

+1 non-binding Thanks & Best Regards.

+1 Thanks for doing the hard work here Brendan and your team, and for providing such a balanced and easy-to-consume summary. And to Torin, Tim and the rest of the OPA crew for the lucid proposal, and

Hey Folks, I've completed my technical due-dilligence for OPA to move to incubation. tl;dr; I'm supportive, with some plans to address a few issues. In general, the project is in great shape along

+1 non-binding On Mar 20, 2019, at 8:48 AM, Grigoriu, Marius via Lists.Cncf.Io <marius.grigoriu=nordstrom.com@...> wrote:

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of Pengfei Ni <feiskyer@...> Date: Wednesday, March 20, 2019 at 6:04 AM To: iftach Schonbaum <iftachsc@...> Cc: "sonya@..." <sonya@...>, Chris

+1 non-binding - Lee

+1 non-binding Best regards. --- Pengfei Ni iftach Schonbaum <iftachsc@...> 于2019年3月20日周三 下午2:41写道：

+1 non-binding Iftach Schonbaum Senior Solution Architect +972-52-8281751 cloudzone.io From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Sonya Koptyev via Lists.Cncf.Io"