|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1
--
Mark Coleman
T. +31 6 52 13 49 60
W. www.implicit-explicit.com
Hello.
We are the Implicit-Explicit company.
Connectors at large.
You and your users should meet.
Really.
You should.
|
+1
--
Mark Coleman
T. +31 6 52 13 49 60
W. www.implicit-explicit.com
Hello.
We are the Implicit-Explicit company.
Connectors at large.
You and your users should meet.
Really.
You should.
|
By
Mark Coleman <mark@...>
·
#3338
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Indeed +1
This is great !
Thanks,
Vineet
|
Indeed +1
This is great !
Thanks,
Vineet
|
By
Vineet Gupta
·
#3337
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Huge +1!!
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#3336
·
|
|
Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve
|
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3335
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 great step to benefit for all industries .
Thanks
|
+1 great step to benefit for all industries .
Thanks
|
By
Vineet Gupta
·
#3334
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
Enthusiastic +1 non-binding 🎉
|
Enthusiastic +1 non-binding 🎉
|
By
Andrew Martin
·
#3333
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding.
--
Tom Keiser
tom@...
|
+1 non-binding.
--
Tom Keiser
tom@...
|
By
Tom Keiser
·
#3332
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
By
Igor Mameshin
·
#3331
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
By
Justin Cappos <jcappos@...>
·
#3330
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
On 30/05/19 1:17 AM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
-- Cheers & Best regards,Feilong Wang
|
+1 non-binding
On 30/05/19 1:17 AM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
-- Cheers & Best regards,Feilong Wang
|
By
Feilong Wang <feilong@...>
·
#3329
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 binding
By
Brian Grant
·
#3328
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 binding
By
Liz Rice
·
#3327
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
By
Maor Goldberg
·
#3326
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 nb
On 5/29/19 9:17 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
|
+1 nb
On 5/29/19 9:17 PM, Chris Aniszczyk wrote:
|
By
Haining Zhang
·
#3325
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 (non-binding)
I'm really happy to see this becoming (or potentially becoming) an official SIG. In talking to a lot of users in the Cloud Native space. practical advice around security is something
|
+1 (non-binding)
I'm really happy to see this becoming (or potentially becoming) an official SIG. In talking to a lot of users in the Cloud Native space. practical advice around security is something
|
By
Michael Ducy
·
#3324
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1.
--Mark
By
Mark Stemm
·
#3323
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 binding.
By
Li, Xiang
·
#3322
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding.
Thanks, Sonya
Sonya Koptyev | Director of Evangelism | m: +1 425 505 0100
On May 29, 2019, 9:38 AM -0700, Chris Short via Lists.Cncf.Io <chris=chrisshort.net@...>, wrote:
|
+1 non-binding.
Thanks, Sonya
Sonya Koptyev | Director of Evangelism | m: +1 425 505 0100
On May 29, 2019, 9:38 AM -0700, Chris Short via Lists.Cncf.Io <chris=chrisshort.net@...>, wrote:
|
By
Sonya Koptyev <sonya@...>
·
#3321
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
Web | Newsletter | Twitter
|
+1 non-binding
--
Chris Short
Web | Newsletter | Twitter
|
By
Chris Short
·
#3320
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 nb excellent and happy to contribute
--
Shea Stewart, Partner
Arctiq: Intelligent Architecture
shea.stewart@...
+1-647-972-5191
http://www.arctiq.ca
|
+1 nb excellent and happy to contribute
--
Shea Stewart, Partner
Arctiq: Intelligent Architecture
shea.stewart@...
+1-647-972-5191
http://www.arctiq.ca
|
By
Shea Stewart
·
#3319
·
|
