We will be meeting

Hey all, just to let you know we published the conference transparency report for Barcelona:

I was a bit confused over all these different types of groups. We have special interest groups, work groups, user groups, technical steering committees, technical oversight committees, not to mention

Hi Erin, hi Frederick, I hope it goes without saying that I’m all for people coming together to collaborate! And there is precedent - for example the group of folks who got together as SAFE has now

Hi Liz & Cheryl, I think what we hope to accomplish from a SIG is a more open dialogue for users/developers to really come together and get work done. I know there is some concerns over past

Hi Frederick, As Liz said, user groups don't fall under the TOC, and the Telecom and Financial Services groups have grown more or less organically. Philosophically, end users find it easier to

I'll do it, I've cc'd some of the maintainers here for awareness and will do a separate intro. https://github.com/open-telemetry/community/blob/master/community-members.md -- Chris Aniszczyk (@cra) |

Hi TOC, Drew, from our Reliability and Observability team, just reached out to me asking for some contacts on the OpenTelemetry project. He said that they are looking to figure out how we can get

Actually copying Cheryl this time On 18 Jun 2019, 22:41 +0200, Liz Rice <liz@...>, wrote:

Hi Erin! My first question would be what the group wants to achieve, and what it is about being a SIG that would help them achieve those goals? Hello Frederick! I think the main difference is that

Frederick! Nice to see you! To answer your question, see: https://github.com/cncf/toc/blob/master/sigs/cncf-sigs.md This outlines the overall goals. While it doesn't directly address user groups, it

I'm relatively new to the organizational structure of the CNCF in regards to user groups vs Sig's. Is someone able to point me to some documentation about the difference between a user group and

Hi TOC, I have a few users from the TUG who were inquiring about the formation of a SIG for this group instead. What are everyone's thoughts around this? Erin -- Erin A. Boyd

https://www.cncf.io/blog/2019/06/11/cncf-openness-guidelines/ CNCF is an open source technical community where technical project collaboration, discussions, and decision-making should be open and

Hey all, we have our TOC project presentation meeting tomorrow: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1aL_W8G0QGBolgmbgXGwpt8yfoTooSJbqAKJkcxcVbJE/edit?usp=sharing We are scheduled to hear from the

To be honest, this is a way better informed spam without results. I do not see an agreement being made on what is being achieved in this discussion. What do we want to stop? A gamified starred

Alexis, thank you for the insights. > "Netdata is a fine project, but we struggled (as a TOC) to see it as cloud native." > "The decision was unanimous, in that no TOC member wished to sponsor

I was thinking of this comment: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/163#issuecomment-437167354 Harbor incubation proposal by clouderati · Pull Request #163 · cncf/toc · GitHub +1 non-binding. Our

Perhaps you’re thinking further kubernetes integrations which was in the slide deck for the TOC presentation. That preso was on 2018-06-19 while the links I provided for an early tagged release

Wasn't Harbor originally delivered ONLY as a virtual appliance, with the containers coming later? The discussion of whether to accept it as a CNCF project received pushback at the time based