|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
IMO: a diversity goal here is true internationalization
IMO: a diversity goal here is true internationalization
|
By
alexis richardson
·
#3350
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
As a Jewish, white-skinned, gender non-conforming individual, I understand. I would give up my place at the table, however, for a person of color or other under-represented person. Yes, there's a
As a Jewish, white-skinned, gender non-conforming individual, I understand. I would give up my place at the table, however, for a person of color or other under-represented person. Yes, there's a
|
By
Jaice Singer DuMars <jaice@...>
·
#3349
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
(Though I would say that stating the issue solely as “white” and “men” is reductive in the gender issue, ignores the heteronormativity, and ignores physical, developmental, and other
(Though I would say that stating the issue solely as “white” and “men” is reductive in the gender issue, ignores the heteronormativity, and ignores physical, developmental, and other
|
By
Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...>
·
#3348
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1 for this +1.
Roger B.A. Klorese
Senior Product Manager
SUSE
705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000
Seattle WA 98104
(P)+1 206.217.7432
(M)+1 425.444.5493
roger.klorese@...
Schedule a meeting:
+1 for this +1.
Roger B.A. Klorese
Senior Product Manager
SUSE
705 5th Ave S, Suite 1000
Seattle WA 98104
(P)+1 206.217.7432
(M)+1 425.444.5493
roger.klorese@...
Schedule a meeting:
|
By
Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...>
·
#3347
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1 as well, and glad to see this conversation moving forward.
One point I want to make absolutely clear is that diversity does not mean "corporate diversity" or "diversity of thought" or any other
+1 as well, and glad to see this conversation moving forward.
One point I want to make absolutely clear is that diversity does not mean "corporate diversity" or "diversity of thought" or any other
|
By
Jaice Singer DuMars <jaice@...>
·
#3346
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Liz,
Thank you so much for bringing this up, it's definitely something I'm thinking about as we build out sustainable SIGs.
Confab (content strategy conference) just had a very good keynote on this:
Liz,
Thank you so much for bringing this up, it's definitely something I'm thinking about as we build out sustainable SIGs.
Confab (content strategy conference) just had a very good keynote on this:
|
By
Amye Scavarda Perrin
·
#3345
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1 and a comment:
It has seemed to me so far that the term “diversity” at CNCF is widely assumed to mean “more, and more equitable representation of, women.” I attended a diversity session at
+1 and a comment:
It has seemed to me so far that the term “diversity” at CNCF is widely assumed to mean “more, and more equitable representation of, women.” I attended a diversity session at
|
By
Roger Klorese <roger.klorese@...>
·
#3344
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Yes, clearly, supporting and encouraging diversity is well-placed suggestion. +1.
Steve, I thought of sending this same request earlier. I agree. Examples would elicit desired behavior as well as
Yes, clearly, supporting and encouraging diversity is well-placed suggestion. +1.
Steve, I thought of sending this same request earlier. I agree. Examples would elicit desired behavior as well as
|
By
Lee Calcote
·
#3343
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
I defer to the experts here but I highly recommend taking this free course we put together and require for all staff as a
I defer to the experts here but I highly recommend taking this free course we put together and require for all staff as a
|
By
Chris Aniszczyk
·
#3342
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 (non binding).
Thanks
Suresh
+1 (non binding).
Thanks
Suresh
|
By
Suresh Krishnan
·
#3341
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Might I suggest that along with the requirements we include specific examples for the SIG leads for how they might go about increasing the diversity within their SIG? SIG leads might be supportive but
Might I suggest that along with the requirements we include specific examples for the SIG leads for how they might go about increasing the diversity within their SIG? SIG leads might be supportive but
|
By
Stephen Watt
·
#3340
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1
--
Erin A. Boyd
Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
+1
--
Erin A. Boyd
Senior Principal Software Engineer, OCTO
Red Hat
eboyd@...
|
By
Erin Boyd
·
#3339
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
+1
--
Mark Coleman
T. +31 6 52 13 49 60
W. www.implicit-explicit.com
Hello.
We are the Implicit-Explicit company.
Connectors at large.
You and your users should meet.
Really.
You should.
+1
--
Mark Coleman
T. +31 6 52 13 49 60
W. www.implicit-explicit.com
Hello.
We are the Implicit-Explicit company.
Connectors at large.
You and your users should meet.
Really.
You should.
|
By
Mark Coleman <mark@...>
·
#3338
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Indeed +1
This is great !
Thanks,
Vineet
Indeed +1
This is great !
Thanks,
Vineet
|
By
Vineet Gupta
·
#3337
·
|
|
Re: Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Huge +1!!
By
Stephen Augustus
·
#3336
·
|
|
Encouraging diversity through the SIGs
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve
Alexis just shared an idea with me that I think is so great that I wanted to act immediately! This comes out of discussions with several folks at KubeCon and elsewhere about how we can improve
|
By
Liz Rice
·
#3335
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 great step to benefit for all industries .
Thanks
+1 great step to benefit for all industries .
Thanks
|
By
Vineet Gupta
·
#3334
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
Enthusiastic +1 non-binding 🎉
Enthusiastic +1 non-binding 🎉
|
By
Andrew Martin
·
#3333
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding.
--
Tom Keiser
tom@...
+1 non-binding.
--
Tom Keiser
tom@...
|
By
Tom Keiser
·
#3332
·
|
|
Re: [VOTE] CNCF Security SIG
+1 non-binding
By
Igor Mameshin
·
#3331
·
|