+1 non-binding thanks -Cathy _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Hybrid Cloud | OM Knative (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people, the

+1 nb From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "ron.doyle via Lists.Cncf.Io" <ron.doyle=broadcom.com@...> Reply-To: <ron.doyle@...> Date: Friday, October 18, 2019 at 8:50 AM To: Chris Aniszczyk

+1 non-binding -- Ron Doyle, PhD CTO, Enterprise Software Division, Broadcom

+1 non-binding thanks -Doug _______________________________________________________ STSM | IBM Hybrid Cloud | OM Knative (919) 254-6905 | IBM 444-6905 | dug@... The more I'm around some people,

+1 non-binding From: <cncf-toc@...> on behalf of "Chris Aniszczyk via Lists.Cncf.Io" <caniszczyk=linuxfoundation.org@...> Reply-To: "caniszczyk@..." <caniszczyk@...> Date: Friday, October 18, 2019

CloudEvents (CE) has requested to move to the incubation maturity level: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/297 The project was initially developed as a result of the CNCF Serverless WGs investigation

Hi folks, I think the comments have petered out so I would like to formally call for a graduation vote for Jaeger. I believe @Amye Scavarda Perrin will kick it off tomorrow. Thanks, Matt

A couple of PRs that have been around for a while, and I don’t think are terribly controversial: https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/257 - Diversity requirements https://github.com/cncf/toc/pull/227 -

apologies I am running late and may miss today's call. I have reviewed the presentations and would be happy to sync with Liz & the rest of the TOC after the call if needed. alexis

We're prioritizing graduation reviews for our October 15th meeting as well as our November meeting before KubeCon/CloudNativeCon. On the agenda is: Falco Graduation Review Vitess Graduation

Related to comments from @Joe Beda and @William Morgan, my general feeling is that frankly very few organizations get actual value out of distributed tracing currently, no matter what provider they

Super post wm

On the topic of "the state of tracing", we JUST added tracing support to Linkerd. As someone with no real horse in the DT race, but with a desire to actually provide a concrete solution to our users,

CNCF TOC, It's with great pleasure I present to you Falco's proposal to move to Incubation. Next Tuesday, October 15th, we will be presenting the project's annual review on the TOC call. In

A couple of thoughts. We should talk about the state of “tracing” in general. It is useful to say that someone like Facebook is using it but it is also important to call out that they

Thanks Yuri and Matt. This has been helpful for me. I realised what was bothering me. I think we should graduate Jaeger; but when we do so I think we should also provide some thoughts on the state

Thanks, Matt. Yes, I wouldn't disagree about the niche qualification. Adopting tracing is relatively difficult today due to lack of reusable instrumentation, which will hopefully change with

I will let @Yuri Shkuro and @Gary Brown chime in, but FWIW, my own take is that distributed tracing in general is still fairly niche and likely to be found at early adopter companies/enterprises. I'm

Ticketmaster is an enterprise. So is Uber but they are the parent Co. Weaveworks is not an enterprise, it is a small isv. Has jaeger found much traction among, say, non members of CNCF? My worry

We are probably about to get way off topic, but just to make sure I understand, what exactly is the definition of an enterprise here? Is Ticketmaster an enterprise? Is Uber?